Bmac Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Excellent update for such a "classic" team. I'm personally not a fan of the Cubs current logo, it just seems kinda goofy for some reason. Your update makes it look more professional. I love the alternate logo, but I'm not quite sold on the eyes. I think something about the red on white look is throwing it off. The uniforms look fantastic. Love the socks. And I'm in the group that likes the red-billed cap as an alternate. Phenomenal work on this one. https://www.behance.net/bmatukewic8043 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchez Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 I love the mean Cub without the red eye(s)P.S. What makes the Cubs a "classic team" Not saying the White Sox are, only two MLB franchises can be considered classic, Cardinals and one from New York. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 I love the mean Cub without the red eye(s)P.S. What makes the Cubs a "classic team" Not saying the White Sox are, only two MLB franchises can be considered classic, Cardinals and one from New York.Why can only two be considered classic? Cubs, Dodgers, Red Sox, yes even the White Sox I guess, Tigers, Phillies, Cubs, just to name a few, ALL classic teams. I don't get your criteria. https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmets Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Not crazy about the bear, or the use of tan, but everything else is spot on. The new "Cubs" logo looks 1000% better than what they wear now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted August 28, 2012 Author Share Posted August 28, 2012 Couple updates, but nothing earth-shattering.Thickened the outline on the primary. Still not as thick as they use presently, though.Got rid of the tan, but still kind of stuck on how to integrate red into the logo without it looking like it's possessed.Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 Couple updates, but nothing earth-shattering.Thickened the outline on the primary. Still not as thick as they use presently, though.Got rid of the tan, but still kind of stuck on how to integrate red into the logo without it looking like it's possessed.Thoughts?Take the bottom blue and white one and put it in the red circle like the past sleeve patches and you'll be good. https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illwauk Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 I love the mean Cub without the red eye(s)P.S. What makes the Cubs a "classic team" Not saying the White Sox are, only two MLB franchises can be considered classic, Cardinals and one from New York.I'd say a "classic team" is any team that can trace its lineage back to the "original 8" of either league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 Couple updates, but nothing earth-shattering.Thickened the outline on the primary. Still not as thick as they use presently, though.Got rid of the tan, but still kind of stuck on how to integrate red into the logo without it looking like it's possessed.Thoughts?Take the bottom blue and white one and put it in the red circle like the past sleeve patches and you'll be good.I like the new primary a lot. The cubbie face, as you stated, needs a bit of help. I know this seems cheap, but maybe play with putting the flat-blue cubbie into some sort of badge or round patch? Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.