Jump to content

Things you don't see in sports anymore


kajeet

Recommended Posts

Also teams that build championship contenders through the draft instead of buying players.

It's funny a Lakers fan would mention that. B)

Off topic, but I've been meaning to ask you about your sig; didn't you used to be a Clippers fan? :P

 

BB52Big.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

1. The Freeze, a spray can of ice that was sprayed on baseball players when they got hit by a pitch.

It was actually ethyl chloride, and I believe it isn't used anymore because it's possibly a carcinogen.

Well Keith Hernandez said it never helped

ecyclopedia.gif

www.sportsecyclopedia.com

For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at

http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com

champssigtank.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also teams that build championship contenders through the draft instead of buying players. The Thunder and spurs are the only teams I know that were mostly built using the draft.

It's a different sport, but I'd put the Packers on that list. Charles Woodson was pretty much the only player on the 2010 (Super Bowl) team that had significant experience with another organization. They signed Jeff Saturday and Cedric Benson this year, but that's still pretty much it for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone should bring that back. I nominate the Brewers, since they're all about glorifying the 1980s, but then again it would be weird since they were in the AL when that was a trend.

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't see moments that really transcend sports anymore unless it's profoundly negative. The Miracle On Ice, Jackie Robinson, Jesse Owens, etc. PSU/Sandusky, steroids/PEDs across all sports, and so on. Maybe it's a sign of the times and how our mass media glorifies tragedy, not sure.

Quote
"You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke."

twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't see moments that really transcend sports anymore unless it's profoundly negative. The Miracle On Ice, Jackie Robinson, Jesse Owens, etc. PSU/Sandusky, steroids/PEDs across all sports, and so on. Maybe it's a sign of the times and how our mass media glorifies tragedy, not sure.

Depends on what you mean by the word transcend.

I can think of plenty of great sports moments that have happened over the past decade. Red Sox winning the World Series in '04, Michael Phelps, USC/Texas in the Rose Bowl.

But two of the guys you brought up in Jesse Owens and Jackie Robinson helped break down racial barriers. There's not too many left and those that do exist aren't nearly as severe as what existed then. And with the Miracle on Ice, the cold war is over. Those types of stories (thankfully) are over for the time being, at least in the US.

In terms of the media I would defintely agree there is far more attention focused on negative news stories then positive ones.

Overall I would say have times changed? Certainly so, but I guess where I disagree is saying they've changed for the worse. Some things like the media I do wish were different, but I'll take today's society over the 1950's any day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also part of the issue is that now everything is 24/7 and has to be broken down a week before and afterwards, there's no room to let anything just breathe. It has to be compared to something else and analyzed instantly.

If the Miracle on Ice happened exactly as it did only today, we'd have known the outcome before anyone saw it, it'd be tweeted, all over your home pages, ESPN, whatever, and it wouldn't be that OMG DID THIS JUST HAPPEN??!?!?! moment. It wouldn't be possible nowadays.

65caba33-7cfc-417f-ac8e-5eb8cdd12dc9_zps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May have been mentioned before...but...no corporate sponsors for everything during the telecast! Everything these days is "call to the bullpen by AT&T" or "safe and secure at second by New York Life". And I'm relatively young (30 years old) but it's irritating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's one I haven't seen yet: transcendent nicknames.

Remember back in the day when players were probably known more by their nicknames (which also by the way weren't forced or contrived unlike the current media age) than their real names? Think about it:

Billy "White Shoes" Johnson

Dick "Night Train" Lane

Elroy "Crazy Legs" Hirsch

Deacon Jones (whose actual first name is David, though most couldn't tell you or never knew)

"The Golden Jet" Bobby Hull

"The Great One" Wayne Gretzky

Oil Can Boyd (real first name Dennis)

Catfish Hunter (real first name James...or Jim if you prefer)

"Pistol" Pete Maravich

Dr. J (you already know)

Earl "The Pearl" Monroe

William "Refrigerator" Perry

Magic Johnson (again, you already know)

Michael "Air Jordan" (a nickname so transcendent it turned into a sneaker line)

There's a host of others...and even in more modern times we've had transcendent nicknames that stuck, such as "Prime Time" (Deion Sanders), "The Playmaker" (Michael Irvin), "Minister of Defense" (Reggie White), "The Bus"(Jerome Bettis), The Admiral (David Robinson), the Twin Towers (the aforementioned Robinson and Tim Duncan, also, probably less popularly, referred to as the "Big Fundamental"), "The Glove" (Gary Payton, so named for his defensive prowess), Craig "Iron Head" Hayward, Chipper Jones especially (quick?what's his real first name???), Dominik "The Dominator" Hasek. (But then, nicknaming seems to be so prevalent in hockey I'm not even sure if it belongs in this particular discussion.)

And, of course, if one wants to add transcendent team nicknames, there's the Blackshirts, No-Name Defense, Steel Curtain, amd Purple People Eaters. We really don't see that anymore...but I can remember several media circles tried their hardest to pin one on the Baltimore Ravens' defense back during their Super Bowl season.

(Fake edit: oh?and since I just thought about it, here's sonething else we don't see anymore and msy never see again: dynasties. I fully believe the days of teams winning three titles in a row, or three in a four-year period, are all but over.)

*Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. 😁

|| dribbble || Behance ||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't believe this hasn't come up yet...sleeves on football jerseys.

singletarypf-1.jpgjohn-elway.jpgnfl_g_8449ers_576.jpg

I still maintain that long sleeves look awkward and uncomfortable on the football field.

I wonder if a player can even tell the difference between wearing sleeves and not. I really doubt they can. When I played baseball, I never noticed a difference when wearing a long sleeve t-shirt shirt under my jersey on cold days.

 

BB52Big.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember back in the day when players were probably known more by their nicknames (which also by the way weren't forced or contrived unlike the current media age) than their real names?

Still happens. King James, CP3, Ocho Cinco, TO, Tiger, Linsanity, JPP, and Floyd Money come to mind immediately.

xLmjWVv.png

POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember back in the day when players were probably known more by their nicknames (which also by the way weren't forced or contrived unlike the current media age) than their real names?

Still happens. King James, CP3, Ocho Cinco, TO, Tiger, Linsanity, JPP, and Floyd Money come to mind immediately.

Most of these are forced though...they're nicknames just to have nicknames.

65caba33-7cfc-417f-ac8e-5eb8cdd12dc9_zps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.