pianoknight Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Texas Longhorns football. Now basketball is a different story.I'll add Nebraska and Oklahoma to that list, too.For that matter, you really could include USC, Alabama and Penn State into the mix. 5th in NAT. TITLES | 2nd in CONF. TITLES | 5th in HEISMAN | 7th in DRAFTS | 8th in ALL-AMER | 7th in WINS | 4th in BOWLS | 1st in SELLOUTS | 1st GAMEDAY SIGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Colts, Bears, Packers, Rams, Dolphins, Browns, Broncos (yes i like the brown and yellow) Chiefs, Raiders, Cowboys, Redskins, Lions, Falcons, 49ersim not in total love with all of those identities but they're solid enough that i wouldnt call them bad GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mingjai Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Texas Longhorns football. Now basketball is a different story.I'll add Nebraska and Oklahoma to that list, too.For that matter, you really could include USC, Alabama and Penn State into the mix.I wouldn't say never on Nebraska--I was never a fan of Nebraska's wide-stripe, side panel look, especially the away version: Visit my store on REDBUBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pianoknight Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Texas Longhorns football. Now basketball is a different story.I'll add Nebraska and Oklahoma to that list, too.For that matter, you really could include USC, Alabama and Penn State into the mix.I wouldn't say never on Nebraska--I was never a fan of Nebraska's wide-stripe, side panel look, especially the away version:I wasn't a fan of it, but it wasn't terrible and lasted a single season. I was also assuming that the idea of "never" having a bad look was not inclusive of ProCombats or one-off games. Nebraska's upcoming pajama pants look against Wisconsin might make some heads roll, but it's not really a "look," as much as a one game promo. 5th in NAT. TITLES | 2nd in CONF. TITLES | 5th in HEISMAN | 7th in DRAFTS | 8th in ALL-AMER | 7th in WINS | 4th in BOWLS | 1st in SELLOUTS | 1st GAMEDAY SIGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckymack Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 In my opinion, there are several teams that have never had a 'bad' look. In the context of this thread, I'm equating 'bad' with 'ugly', and can only speak for uniforms created during the late 1950's through the present. MLBChicago CubsNew York YankeesSt. Louis CardinalsNew York Mets*Los Angeles DodgersSan Fransisco GiantsKansas City Royals*Texas RangersNFLHouston OilersNew York JetsChicago BearsGreen Bay PackersSan Fransisco 49ers*Miami DolphinsKansas City ChiefsOakland RaidersIndianapolis ColtsCarolina PanthersTampa Bay BuccaneersNBABoston CelticsChicago BullsSan Antonio SpursLos Angeles LakersOklahoma City ThunderDenver NuggetsNHLChicago BlackhawksDetroit Red WingsMontreal Canadiens*denotes inclusion of BFBS-era uniforms Sigs are for sissies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuordr Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Packers, Reds, CelticsI disagree with the Reds due to the overabundance of black on their uniforms from 1999 to 2006.I always like the incorporation of black myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tubby34 Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 No one has mentioned Oakland, almost all of their uniforms are beautiful, including te 70's and 80's.The Mets too, even their BFBS uniforms were nice.I feel like most of you in this thread are simply picking the teams that have never changed, penn state, the Yankees, the Canadians, Celtics.Longevity isn't the basis for a great identity. It's simply the hallmark of stubbornness. Granted the designs I mentioned above are classic and I like them, but some people seem to confuse longevity with beauty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varsity Blue Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Texas Longhorns football. Now basketball is a different story.I'll add Nebraska and Oklahoma to that list, too.For that matter, you really could include USC, Alabama and Penn State into the mix.No, and never means NEVER.Houston Oilers (R.I.P.), Texas, Michigan, KC Chiefs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportstar1212 Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Expos, Chargers, Whalers, Bucaneers, Angels (excluding the Disney-era set), and the Brewers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 St. Louis Cardinals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldRamsFan Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Texas-Arlington Mavericks FootballTexas A&M FootballLos Angeles Rams (the only Rams uniform I didn't like were the St. Louis jerseys from 2001-2002) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimEOBrien Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 White Sox.Their only 'bad' uniforms are so epically bad, they're amazing. They wore shorts during multiple professional baseball games. I know people will disagree with me, but from my perspective, they're bad uniforms are like cult classic movies, they're awful but that's why their great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Its easy to pick a team with a nice uniform who never changes it (Celtics, Raiders, Dodgers...), but what about a list of teams who never had a bad look, with a minimum of 4 or 5 changes? That's the trick. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuordr Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Its easy to pick a team with a nice uniform who never changes it (Celtics, Raiders, Dodgers...), but what about a list of teams who never had a bad look, with a minimum of 4 or 5 changes? That's the trick.Someone already mentioned this team, but based on this picture I have to agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimEOBrien Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Its easy to pick a team with a nice uniform who never changes it (Celtics, Raiders, Dodgers...), but what about a list of teams who never had a bad look, with a minimum of 4 or 5 changes? That's the trick.Someone already mentioned this team, but based on this picture I have to agree. eeeh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hailstateunis Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Lakers dodgers, celtics, bulls, Yankees, SF Giants,cardinals, colts, cowboys, steelers.Steelers looked terrible in 1934.I'll add that the Seahawks have always looked pretty good. 2002-2011 was their weakest, but still not bad. http://www.hailstateunis.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 The Steelers have always looked awful. The lopsided helmets. Mismatching stripes. If not for winning a few games in the 1970s, those atrocious uniforms would be long gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimEOBrien Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 The Steelers have always looked awful. The lopsided helmets. Mismatching stripes. If not for winning a few games in the 1970s, those atrocious uniforms would be long gone.Sour grapes much? Those teams are, arguably, the greatest dynasty in NFL history, at least post merger fur sur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 The Steelers have always looked awful. The lopsided helmets. Mismatching stripes. If not for winning a few games in the 1970s, those atrocious uniforms would be long gone.Sour grapes much? Those teams are, arguably, the greatest dynasty in NFL history, at least post merger fur sur.No sour grapes. I'm simply stating that had they not won those Super Bowls, the present-day Steelers wouldn't look so sloppy and outdated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seahawk9 Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Seattle Seahawks until 2002........................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.