Raysfan12 Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 IU basketball and the Celtics Home and Road uniforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Hartford WhalersReally? The Hartford Whalers never had a bad look? I have one word for you: Cooperalls.The team's iconic logo notwithstanding, the presence of the Cooperalls rendered the Hartford Whalers' 1982-83 uniforms the definition of an exceedingly "bad look". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 Hartford WhalersReally? The Hartford Whalers never had a bad look? I have one word for you: Cooperalls.The team's iconic logo notwithstanding, the presence of the Cooperalls rendered the Hartford Whalers' 1982-83 uniforms the definition of an exceedingly "bad look".im not a hockey guy at all, but i dont think that uniform is all that badIts easy to pick a team with a nice uniform who never changes it (Celtics, Raiders, Dodgers...), but what about a list of teams who never had a bad look, with a minimum of 4 or 5 changes? That's the trick.that is tougher, but so many teams have done designs that were right for the time. its easy to look back on them today and say how bad it looks, but they were stylin' in the day. i do believe great design is timeless but i wouldnt say someone was doing it wrng if they were being trendy. im thinking of the Utah Jazz right now GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 im not a hockey guy at all, but i dont think that uniform is all that badWe'll have to agree to disagree. In my opinion, the Cooperalls render the uniform an aesthetic abomination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 im not a hockey guy at all, but i dont think that uniform is all that badWe'll have to agree to disagree. In my opinion, the Cooperalls render the uniform an aesthetic abomination.is it because it looks like Adidas? or because theres so much white across the bottom of the jersey? i just cant find a reason to really hate it from these photos GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattb6 Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 detroit lions, ohio state football and defiantly the red wings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 is it because it looks like Adidas? or because theres so much white across the bottom of the jersey? i just cant find a reason to really hate it from these photosIt is because the Cooperalls were full-length pants. There's nothing wrong with wearing a pair of trousers... unless you're a player doing so on the ice-surface in the middle of a hockey game. The Cooperalls aside, I also preferred these Hartford Whalers uniforms... ... to the predominantly Green versions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSox44 Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Celtics, Raiders, Cardinals, Red Wings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winghaz Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 There should be a statute of limitations on never. For example, anything before 1930 shouldn't count. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brave-Bird 08 Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Homer pick here. .......oh.....wait.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kajeet Posted September 14, 2012 Author Share Posted September 14, 2012 There should be a statute of limitations on never. For example, anything before 1930 shouldn't count.I probably should put the cutoff at around 1940s since most of the designs before that were kind of weird.I think around the 1940s are when most uniforms started to look good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 The Seahawks have always looked pretty good. 2002-2011 was their weakest, but still not bad.Is this sarcasm? The Seahawks are a team that makes worse and worse decisions with every change. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illwauk Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 The Steelers have always looked awful. The lopsided helmets. Mismatching stripes. If not for winning a few games in the 1970s, those atrocious uniforms would be long gone.Sour grapes much? Those teams are, arguably, the greatest dynasty in NFL history, at least post merger fur sur.No sour grapes. I'm simply stating that had they not won those Super Bowls, the present-day Steelers wouldn't look so sloppy and outdated.They only look sloppy because today's uniforms are shoehorned into templates... not that I wouldn't love to see a Steelers uniform with Oregon's diamond-pate shoulders from a few years back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YessSir32 Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Tigers? They have pretty much been the same throughout. I've never really heard someone say they look bad. Detroit Falcons (NABL) | Detroit Gears (UFL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Auburn's always looked decent... POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Also, I generally like pretty much every Michigan road uniform in recent memory. My personal favorites are the Nike maize-piping roads and the Adidas barberpole-shoulder roads.The only terrible road look I can remember is the cheap-looking garbage they wore in the Sugar Bowl: POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin W. Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Michigan had those awful tusk uniforms, so that's a mark against them. Mighty Ducks of Anaheim (CHL - 2018 Orr Cup Champions) Chicago Rivermen (UBA/WBL - 2014, 2015, 2017 Intercontinental Cup Champions) King's Own Hexham FC (BIP - 2022 Saint's Cup Champions) Portland Explorers (EFL - Elite Bowl XIX Champions) Real San Diego (UPL) Red Bull Seattle (ULL - 2018, 2019, 2020 Gait Cup Champions) Vancouver Huskies (CL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hailstateunis Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 The Seahawks have always looked pretty good. 2002-2011 was their weakest, but still not bad.Is this sarcasm? The Seahawks are a team that makes worse and worse decisions with every change.No, this was not sarcam. Believe it or not, people have different tastes than you. http://www.hailstateunis.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Thought of another one.... Kansas State: POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuordr Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 detroit lions, ohio state football and defiantly the red wingsLions: barfBuckeyes: If that is not a bad look I do not know what is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.