pats2000 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 the new one looks like an update for an fcs team like southern, but other than that, you can tell that the old one is dated side by side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Island_Style Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 All of my facebook Jag friends love the secondary shield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GotPixels Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 I could see the Secondary logo on a two-tone Gold and Black helmet. Just saying. Old Dog Learning New Tricks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigEd76 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Eh, glad to see this thing might come out today. I've been waiting on the opportunity to see the general public's reaction.This was th wtf one wasn't it?I think this Jags one is the "modernization" one and the Dolphins is the "WTF" one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sterling84 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 i HATE that they changed the spots. the jaguar spots are supposed to be bulls-eye like... semi circles with a small spot in the middle. the old one sorta had that, the new one eliminates it completly. thats the main aethetic difference between a jaguar and, say a cheetah.Actually, those are called Rosettes. And in as much as they are the defining pattern feature that separates Jaguars and Leopards from Cheetahs, the rosettes turn into spots as the fur approaches the feet and/or the head (turn to stripes at the tail). So in that sense, they didn't flub it. The Official Cheese-Filled Snack of NASCAR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chriscj83 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 I really like it. I can't seem to explain why. There are a few things I don't like about it, but each time I look at the logo, I like it more and more.The thing that really stands out to me is that it looks a bit feminine. It might be the two "spots" above the eye that are a bit more vertical; they look like eyelashes and make the cat look like Nala from Lion King. (Now that I've looked up Nala on on Google, she doesn't have eyelashes...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFB Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 It looks like a design from a mid-90s expansion team -- oh, hey! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steff002 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Can anyone shed specific light on the Minnesota Vikings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Kinda looks like the jaguar from the previous logo was run over by its automotive namesake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Vikings time baby! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pittsburghsports16 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 My mock-up of what the logo would look like without the double-gold shading (a little reminiscent of the now old logo): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 A lot of the criticism the new logo is getting (cartoonish, not timeless, too illustrative) seems more applicable to the old logo.Couldn't agree more. This is a huge upgrade. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinberwolvikings Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Definitely doesn't evoke a "WTF?" reaction. Neither does the Dolphins leak. Uh-oh Vikings...CDixon already confirmed that the "WTF" is not the Vikings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Not getting why so many are disappointed.I can only speak for myself. To that end, the level of detail in the new Jacksonville Jaguars' logo is not what I'm looking for in a modern, major-pro sports mark.If I were the author of a children's adventure story that featured a jaguar in its action, I'd be thrilled to have an artist turn in illustrations for my book that displayed this level of detail. That said, I don't think such an illustrative style lends itself to modern, major-pro sports applications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresno St. Alum Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 wtf=dolphins, modernized=jags, what was his 3rd option? Same? Vikings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gr3g3 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Less charicature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJworks Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 I'm so mind-boggled as to how this is in any sense an upgrade for any team. They took a huge step backwards in the design process, like they dug up some of the "fan entries" for their now old logo and threw it with some standard text. And what's with the bevels on that shield thing? It's like the damn thing was folded in half and threw this Dr. Seuss cat on it with a horrible "Jags" nickname of their nickname. Not to mention these sensitive fools deleting my comments on their new logo via twitter.This is just absolute trash. Have fun running the rim of the toilet bowl, Jacksonville! Dribbble | Twitter | Facebook | Portfolio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Island_Style Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Glad the dislocated jaw is fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
29texan Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Sorry for being slow, but... what's this about the Vikings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSHARE18 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 As a Jags fan it is growing on me the more that I look at it next to the old one. I dont like the 2 gold colors. I also think there is a little too much white at the bottom. It is going to look like the logo is cut in half from a distance on the helmet. I love the nose,eyes,and mouth though. It looks a lot different but yet still kinda has the same basic designs as the old one. When will we be able to see the style guide? What about the font? I love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.