Jump to content

College Football 2013 Season


GriffinM6

Recommended Posts

Love Oklahoma's identity. Shoes, socks, helmet finish, visor tabs. Classy, clean look. Crimson pants would only add to it. Good looking team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Oklahoma vs. Alabama is an awful uni matchup. Looks like a Spring Game.

Oklahoma doesn't have maroon/red/whatever color that is, pants?!

Straight out, you have horrible tastes. It's one of the best matchups of the year. No unnecessary piping, no unnecessary black, no unnecessary volt, no unnecessary and crappy matte helmets, no grey, no oversized logos. It looks like a football game and not some company PR campaign designed by a moron who had no clue on what looks good. What football should look like.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oklahoma vs. Alabama is an awful uni matchup. Looks like a Spring Game.

Oklahoma doesn't have maroon/red/whatever color that is, pants?!

Really?

This is the best uniform match up of any bowl game I've seen this year. And its not even close.

But it does make you wonder how these teams managed to get into the Sugar Bowl while wearing those uniforms. Aren't we told over and over that in 2014 its absolutely necessary for a college football team to dress their players up in a revolving parade of ridiculous clown outfits? How else can you attract recruits? Hmmm... this is vexing, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oklahoma has one of the best identities in all of college ball. Alabama on the other hand has some strange purpleish colored helmets that look horrible in the doom and clash with the jersey

It is interesting how much better OU's helmet looks when placed side by side Alabama's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oklahoma has one of the best identities in all of college ball. Alabama on the other hand has some strange purpleish colored helmets that look horrible in the doom and clash with the jersey

It is interesting how much better OU's helmet looks when placed side by side Alabama's

Alabama's helmet is the standard Cardinal/Crimson helmet color from Riddell. The dome lighting makes some of them (older ones) have a purple tinge. But I agree that OU's candy finish looks fantastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oklahoma vs. Alabama is an awful uni matchup. Looks like a Spring Game.

Oklahoma doesn't have maroon/red/whatever color that is, pants?!

Really?

This is the best uniform match up of any bowl game I've seen this year. And its not even close.

But it does make you wonder how these teams managed to get into the Sugar Bowl while wearing those uniforms. Aren't we told over and over that in 2014 its absolutely necessary for a college football team to dress their players up in a revolving parade of ridiculous clown outfits? How else can you attract recruits? Hmmm... this is vexing, huh?

Well bamas uniforms are similar to what Oregon wore this year and are one of nikes newest templates. So you can actually still make an argument..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oklahoma vs. Alabama is an awful uni matchup. Looks like a Spring Game.

Oklahoma doesn't have maroon/red/whatever color that is, pants?!

Really?

This is the best uniform match up of any bowl game I've seen this year. And its not even close.

But it does make you wonder how these teams managed to get into the Sugar Bowl while wearing those uniforms. Aren't we told over and over that in 2014 its absolutely necessary for a college football team to dress their players up in a revolving parade of ridiculous clown outfits? How else can you attract recruits? Hmmm... this is vexing, huh?

You know very well that the idea of schools NEEDING to have new, cool uniforms does not apply to the Cream of the SEC Crop, and other top tier schools. LSU, OU, Bama, Texas, Florida are such premier football schools, with stories histories, coaches who are recruiting geniuses, and so forth.

We all know that the advantage of having chrome and GFGS and all the rest is mostly for schools that don't have this advantage. Basically everyone else.

concepts: washington football (2017) ... nfl (2013) ... yikes

potd 10/20/12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What it comes down to is this: every school needs to identify their "point of difference" when recruiting. For teams like OU, Bama, etc. it's winning games, being a part of a storied tradition, playing in big games, etc. For other schools who cannot boast of such things you have to create a reason to come there. Whether that's facilities, uniforms, "friendly" hosts, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus it doesn't hurt that the gear the players get (sweats, shoes, shirts etc.) is the same at Alabama and Oregon. So maybe Alabama and the other "traditional" powers don't use uniforms as a tactic but they use free Nike stuff as one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What it comes down to is this: every school needs to identify their "point of difference" when recruiting. For teams like OU, Bama, etc. it's winning games, being a part of a storied tradition, playing in big games, etc. For other schools who cannot boast of such things you have to create a reason to come there. Whether that's facilities, uniforms, "friendly" hosts, etc.

Thank you I don't get why it's so hard for people to understand this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What it comes down to is this: every school needs to identify their "point of difference" when recruiting. For teams like OU, Bama, etc. it's winning games, being a part of a storied tradition, playing in big games, etc. For other schools who cannot boast of such things you have to create a reason to come there. Whether that's facilities, uniforms, "friendly" hosts, etc.

Thank you I don't get why it's so hard for people to understand this.

Uniforms are one of lower points of getting recruits to sign. Here's a rough ranking of key factors in recruiting:

  1. Coaching Staff and and their track record of getting players drafted. This also requires the ability to pay top dollar for coaches and assistants.
  2. Media Exposure
  3. Facilities
  4. Alumni/Booster Support and their Connections
  5. Other college perks (housing, training table, athlete friendly majors, personal tutors etc.)
  6. Uniforms

What everyone seems to forget is that top to bottom phil knight invested a boatload of money to make oregon a top flight program across all areas. The only thing that the duck program lacked was a multi-decade tradition of winning which he has now created from the ground up. On the other hand you have schools like maryland that have the same level of access to cutting edge uniforms but are lacking in all of the other areas which is evident by their inability to win and attract top tier talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What it comes down to is this: every school needs to identify their "point of difference" when recruiting. For teams like OU, Bama, etc. it's winning games, being a part of a storied tradition, playing in big games, etc. For other schools who cannot boast of such things you have to create a reason to come there. Whether that's facilities, uniforms, "friendly" hosts, etc.

Thank you I don't get why it's so hard for people to understand this.

Uniforms are one of lower points of getting recruits to sign. Here's a rough ranking of key factors in recruiting:

  1. Coaching Staff and and their track record of getting players drafted. This also requires the ability to pay top dollar for coaches and assistants.
  2. Media Exposure
  3. Facilities
  4. Alumni/Booster Support and their Connections
  5. Other college perks (housing, training table, athlete friendly majors, personal tutors etc.)
  6. Uniforms

What everyone seems to forget is that top to bottom phil knight invested a boatload of money to make oregon a top flight program across all areas. The only thing that the duck program lacked was a multi-decade tradition of winning which he has now created from the ground up. On the other hand you have schools like maryland that have the same level of access to cutting edge uniforms but are lacking in all of the other areas which is evident by their inability to win and attract top tier talent.

That's a pretty decent line up, although I'd put uniforms lower than 6th, with campus location, tradition, and probably a few other things falling in between.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but also a lot of colleges have similar boosters, college perks, facilities, media exposure, and to a degree can have similar successes, so to some uniforms might be that difference maker for some, I'm not saying it's a good reason to have these uniforms but it is a reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but also a lot of colleges have similar boosters, college perks, facilities, media exposure, and to a degree can have similar successes, so to some uniforms might be that difference maker for some, I'm not saying it's a good reason to have these uniforms but it is a reason

A lot of the bigger programs have great facilities but NO ONE compares to Oregon. And it's not even close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.