Sign in to follow this  
nash61

Logo updates

Recommended Posts

I've always thought this was the laziest upgrade. It looks like they took their old version and let illustrator outline it in image trace. Awful.

Not really. There are some smalle but noticeable difference and it's clear that they created some of it from scratch. Like the original Dolphins logos, this original was a good idea which was incredibly sloppy. Their clean-up was perfect in my mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not completely sure if this one qualified, but eithe way, it was a huge improvement.

j24jwmt6y3fja8gfjsjkhy6i1.gifg6uheq4mgvrndguzuzak1pcte.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So interesting how some teams can go back 3 or more generations of logos that look alike. Orioles, Seahawks, etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The newest one to join the fold.

7454.png9268_california_golden_bears-alternate-2013.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

w1fg0m8ueoeb9oc0obh0boe3l.gifh3m01xif2aesnqfw1ex5fif5q.gif

I definitely prefer the first logo much more.

Seconded. Definite DOWNgrade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

w1fg0m8ueoeb9oc0obh0boe3l.gifh3m01xif2aesnqfw1ex5fif5q.gif

I definitely prefer the first logo much more.

w1fg0m8ueoeb9oc0obh0boe3l.gifh3m01xif2aesnqfw1ex5fif5q.gif

I definitely prefer the first logo much more.

Seconded. Definite DOWNgrade.

I say the same, but I just put these from oldest (left) to latest (right).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Australian Rules football club changed their logo in 2000.

Port-Adelaide-logo-1997.gifPort-Adelaide-logo-2001.gif

The club is the Port Adelaide Power, and had moved up from a state league (where we were known as the magpies) to the national league in 1997. Another club in the AFL is already the magpies, so we changed to the Power. Because of the original logo we were getting called Port Power a lot, and the club wanted to stop the use of Port Power and emphasize that we are Port Adelaide and have been around for 140 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7izs3ydvvnkji60gmggzgkufj.gif94.gif

And the difference here is.... ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

720.gifwnyd2zhh84f50ux4uxyqbktbh.gif

Major upgrade, IMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

t5mgc3aeqfofhslwi8yzua6ro.gifzq8qkfni1g087f4245egc32po.gif

I loved the old one...must more interesting than the newer one...just my opinion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

aygjgdxtxng8mgeyh3d0i1sc7.gifyo3wysbjtagzmwj37tb11u0fh.gif

237.gif56.gif

6380.gif124.gif

fg1lx64zz806v9yqg32x559ec.gif199.gif

6795.gif144.gif

Mmmmm

It depends on your own definition of upgrade. I see it as the result of make changes to a logo in the same time frame.

To compare a 1920 Canadiens CH to the current one is too easy. Same can be said for the Wings, Hawks and Rangers.

Now, guess what? I never liked the 70's (therefore current) Maple Leafs logo. I don't like that strange leaf shape. By far, the 60's leaf would be the upgrade to the current one and the currect Leafs alternate is fantastic.. Go figure!

I know, I am "old school"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

aygjgdxtxng8mgeyh3d0i1sc7.gifyo3wysbjtagzmwj37tb11u0fh.gif

237.gif56.gif

6380.gif124.gif

fg1lx64zz806v9yqg32x559ec.gif199.gif

6795.gif144.gif

Mmmmm

It depends on your own definition of upgrade. I see it as the result of make changes to a logo in the same time frame.

To compare a 1920 Canadiens CH to the current one is too easy. Same can be said for the Wings, Hawks and Rangers.

Now, guess what? I never liked the 70's (therefore current) Maple Leafs logo. I don't like that strange leaf shape. By far, the 60's leaf would be the upgrade to the current one and the currect Leafs alternate is fantastic.. Go figure!

I know, I am "old school"

No it doesn't. Read the thread title again. UpDATE not UpGRADE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this