NYC FC Branding

[Jaffa 583]

The combination of sky blue shirts/white shorts/ sky blue socks (I presume) is one I really like, so I don't have any complaints about the kit in itself - but it would have been nice to have seen something a little more individual to NYCFC rather than a straight extension of the parent club's 'brand'.

[sozopol 70]

Assuming the change kit is navy, under what circumstances would they wear it, other than at SKC?

[An_SEC_Cheerleader 1]

The combination of sky blue shirts/white shorts/ sky blue socks (I presume) is one I really like, so I don't have any complaints about the kit in itself - but it would have been nice to have seen something a little more individual to NYCFC rather than a straight extension of the parent club's 'brand'.

I agree. I was hoping for something a bit more creative.

An exact clone of the parent club just seems.........kinda "cop-out-ish", but there could be terms and conditions that were set in place behind closed doors.

[GeauxColonels 670]

[Digby 3,519]

Assuming the change kit is navy, under what circumstances would they wear it, other than at SKC?

LA Galaxy and Vancouver?

[Nyk33 881]

I am very disappointed by the main NYCFC jersey. I thought they would at least pull a Melbourne City and try to make it somewhat different from Manchester City.

[Pabig 65]

I don't know really, the kit is nice but it just doesn't feel right. As I said in my previous post they have no unique identity and are just a flat out copy / paste of their parent club.

[An_SEC_Cheerleader 1]

IMO, something that incorporated the royal blue and orange on the flag of Manhattan would have been nice (besides the logo crest).

[IanC 46]

Very smart. Was expecting Navy trim instead of white but looks very tidy. Love the Innaugral Season tag on the bottom.

[sportstar1212 447]

It may be a copy of Man City, but it still looks pretty sharp. I'll definitely be getting one.

[Digby 3,519]

[Mockba 1,869]

I am very disappointed by the main NYCFC jersey. I thought they would at least pull a Melbourne City and try to make it somewhat different from Manchester City.

The only reason Melbourne City isn't a copy of Man City is that the A-League told them they couldn't be a primarily sky blue team, since Sydney is already positioned as a sky blue team.

[Berlin Wall 1,077]

I'm not impressed. But glad they went with sky blue.

[Buc 1,666]

Some orange would've been nice....

...Maybe this sets up the change kit to be navy-based with orange accents....

(Or so one can hope.)

[SCL 191]

Looks very generic which is too bad considering the identity they had created.

[Gothamite 18,721]

I love it. As clean and classic as Adidas can make. Especially with white shorts (hate Man City's all-blue).

As for orange, still expecting an orange keeper kit.

[AJM 122]

Maybe its just the photos presented but the kit looks like it has a "sheen" to it...material maybe?

[Ferdinand Cesarano 4,092]

I would like to have seen some orange trim, perhaps on the ends of the sleeves. I have no philosophical problem with the uniform being a copy of Man City's; it's just that orange is an NYC FC team colour, whereas it is not a Man City team colour.

An interesting thing might have been to put the Adidas stripes in navy-white-orange, in the pattern of the New York City flag. Though I admit that that might have looked too gaudy.

[JTernup 300]

I love it, I WILL be getting one. It's just a shame that they look more like Manchester City than Manchester City does. (Sky shirt with white accents, White shorts and Navy socks is the ideal City look for most supporters.)

[sozopol 70]

I didn't see socks, were there sky blue socks, or navy?