Mid field logo question

[jgiff17]

Does the nfl have restrictions on how big the mid field logo can be? Flipping the channels and saw this high school football game and they have their wordmark/logo going from 35-35 and it looks good I think some of the NFL fields could look fantastic if they pushed the boundaries a little

[Gothamite]

I'm quite sure they do.

[dfwabel]

All endzone markings, decorations, and club identifications at the 50 are, subject to approval from the Commissioner.

It is in the NFL Rulebook.

[Darth Brooks]

Teams tend to go from the 45 to the 45.

Keeps a team from doing something like this:

[phutmasterflex]

Must have been designed with the Logoinator

[WSU151]

I think the real limit is the 43 to 43. The Ravens, Seahawks, 49ers, and Patriots all have logos that extend past the 45s, but not the 43s.

[jgiff17]

Maybe if a team implemented Rogers face in the field art or at least a silhouette then they could get that league approval for anything and I mean anything!

[jgiff17]

And why not give them the 40? 43 seems like someone put way too much thought. I think a huge 40 to 40 Texan logo at midfield would look sweet!

[phutmasterflex]

I think they don't want the logo to intersect with more than one line on either sides of the 50

[chrysleraspen08]

Teams tend to go from the 45 to the 45.

Keeps a team from doing something like this:

I would like it if a team could do that on their field (but preferably with a bit less Phineas and Ferb).

[phutmasterflex]

Teams tend to go from the 45 to the 45.

Keeps a team from doing something like this:

I would like it if a team could do that on their field (but preferably with a bit less more Phineas and Ferb).

FYP

[chrysleraspen08]

Teams tend to go from the 45 to the 45.

Keeps a team from doing something like this:

I would like it if a team could do that on their field (but preferably with a bit less more Phineas and Ferb).

FYP

Is more even possible?

[ohryan]

Maybe I'm just inching closer to "get off my lawn" territory, but I hope the NFL never allows oversized logos. They seem gimmicky and distracting if they get much bigger. I'd rather they keep it simple and professional.

[phutmasterflex]

Maybe I'm just inching closer to "get off my lawn" territory, but I hope the NFL never allows oversized logos. They seem gimmicky and distracting if they get much bigger. I'd rather they keep it simple and professional.

They won't and here is the reason why. If you've ever watched any other professional football game, the field is used as an advertising space. Using the technology of the yellow first down markers sometimes, any empty space on the field is used to place 10-yard advertisements. Major logos take away this opportunity and in the future, I am pretty sure the NFL could very well cave in to the almighty dollar

[wonderbread]

I dont like over sized logos, i like watching tv and be able to see the whole logo when they are at midfield, rather than a logo that is too big to fit on the tv screen

[jgiff17]

I don't think 40-40 would be too bad and give teams like Seattle room to make their logo bigger if they choose to.

[Sabrejeff]

If I remember correctly, the first few years of Paul Brown Stadium (when it was grass), the leaping bengal extended from the 39 to the 39. When they changed to field turf, it was reduced to the 41 to the 41. Since the new turf last year, though, it has been the stupid B.

[vicfurth]

I prefer the smaller ones. Either 45 to 45, or between the hash marks if its a vertical logo. Anything else I don't like at all.