Jump to content

2014 MLB Changes (logo, uniform wise, etc)


TheFloridianLogoMan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The BP jersey release actually might disprove the Mariners change as its one of the ones that does not feature the "pending approval" seal, which would possibly lead us to believe they will be staying the same, for 2014 at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Far as the Mariners go, I've said my piece. This would be change for the sake of change, but whatever. If they're still deadset on looking like the Brewers' kid brothers after next season, screw em.

Far as the Cubs grays go, I want the Cubas. I'd be cool with something similar to either the early 30s or 40s-50s grays. Anything but the current grays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got an email with the new Cubs jacket for next year in it and it used the simple CUBS wordmark (usually paired with a smaller Chicago above it, but not here) in white only. It stood out as odd to me, but it could be nothing. There was still red trim elsewhere, but maybe that's a direction they're headed. However, the BP looks the same in those leaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a tweet a few weeks back from one of the Mariners beat reporters, but I can't recall which one. The Mariners front office denied any plans to change the uniforms for 2014. I think the batting practice jersey leaks confirm that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got an email with the new Cubs jacket for next year in it and it used the simple CUBS wordmark (usually paired with a smaller Chicago above it, but not here) in white only. It stood out as odd to me, but it could be nothing. There was still red trim elsewhere, but maybe that's a direction they're headed. However, the BP looks the same in those leaks.

This?

pMLB2-15615780reg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone post that the Reds will be dropping all the black from their uniforms and have it be true.

Doubt it. Their new dugout jacket is black.
That may just be for the road as their road BP jerseys are black as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got an email with the new Cubs jacket for next year in it and it used the simple CUBS wordmark (usually paired with a smaller Chicago above it, but not here) in white only. It stood out as odd to me, but it could be nothing. There was still red trim elsewhere, but maybe that's a direction they're headed. However, the BP looks the same in those leaks.

This?

pMLB2-15615780reg.jpg

That looks awful. I appreciate subtlety as much as the next guy but jeez... That's almost laughably bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got an email with the new Cubs jacket for next year in it and it used the simple CUBS wordmark (usually paired with a smaller Chicago above it, but not here) in white only. It stood out as odd to me, but it could be nothing. There was still red trim elsewhere, but maybe that's a direction they're headed. However, the BP looks the same in those leaks.

This?

pMLB2-15615780reg.jpg

That looks awful. I appreciate subtlety as much as the next guy but jeez... That's almost laughably bad.

That doesn't look real. For all we know it's just placeholder text until there's a reveal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got an email with the new Cubs jacket for next year in it and it used the simple CUBS wordmark (usually paired with a smaller Chicago above it, but not here) in white only. It stood out as odd to me, but it could be nothing. There was still red trim elsewhere, but maybe that's a direction they're headed. However, the BP looks the same in those leaks.

This?

pMLB2-15615780reg.jpg

That looks awful. I appreciate subtlety as much as the next guy but jeez... That's almost laughably bad.

If it is laughably bad, then it fits the Cubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got an email with the new Cubs jacket for next year in it and it used the simple CUBS wordmark (usually paired with a smaller Chicago above it, but not here) in white only. It stood out as odd to me, but it could be nothing. There was still red trim elsewhere, but maybe that's a direction they're headed. However, the BP looks the same in those leaks.

This?

pMLB2-15615780reg.jpg

That looks awful. I appreciate subtlety as much as the next guy but jeez... That's almost laughably bad.

If it is laughably bad, then it fits the Cubs.

mDhTHw0.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got an email with the new Cubs jacket for next year in it and it used the simple CUBS wordmark (usually paired with a smaller Chicago above it, but not here) in white only. It stood out as odd to me, but it could be nothing. There was still red trim elsewhere, but maybe that's a direction they're headed. However, the BP looks the same in those leaks.

This?

pMLB2-15615780reg.jpg

That looks awful. I appreciate subtlety as much as the next guy but jeez... That's almost laughably bad.

That doesn't look real. For all we know it's just placeholder text until there's a reveal.

That's what it looks like to me. I mean.. the wordmark looks so out of place on that jacket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.