Quillz Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 Watching the World Series, I can't help but notice the Royals logo still has a black drop shadow behind the monogram:I wonder why, when black was dropped from the uniforms around 2006 or so, the logo subsequently wasn't updated to remove the black drop shadow. Maybe in 2015... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phils Phan Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 What amazes me even more is that they didn't remove gold from their primary logo in 2002, considering their uniforms did not have a stitch of gold, not even on the uniform's crown for some ungodly reason. Phillies, Bears, and new NYFC fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 What amazes me even more is that they didn't remove gold from their primary logo in 2002, considering their uniforms did not have a stitch of gold, not even on the uniform's crown for some ungodly reason.Riddle me this, what color would the crown be if it wasn't gold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phils Phan Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 What amazes me even more is that they didn't remove gold from their primary logo in 2002, considering their uniforms did not have a stitch of gold, not even on the uniform's crown for some ungodly reason.Riddle me this, what color would the crown be if it wasn't gold?It was black on the homes for some truly uncomprehendable reason. Phillies, Bears, and new NYFC fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Yeah. How do you screw up a classic uniform like the Royals? Like this. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 The crown being blue wouldn't be that bad, IMO. Although the gold is just fine. It's like how the Dodgers have that red number. It might not necessarily fit in with the rest of the uniform, but it's a classic. Same with the gold in the Royals logo. Unlike the black drop shadow, that's been a part of their visual identity since the start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 The crown being blue wouldn't be that bad, IMO. Although the gold is just fine. It's like how the Dodgers have that red number. It might not necessarily fit in with the rest of the uniform, but it's a classic. Same with the gold in the Royals logo. Unlike the black drop shadow, that's been a part of their visual identity since the start.A gold front num would work well to tie everything together. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 There may not be enough time, and I'm not sure this would even be the right move. but I wonder if the Giants (and maybe Royals, too) are going to wear black armbands or something in honor of Taveras for these last two games. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Given he didn't play for either of those teams, I doubt it. There wasn't any league-wide armband when Adenhart was killed by a drunk driver. The Cardinals will likely have a band next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 There may not be enough time, and I'm not sure this would even be the right move. but I wonder if the Giants (and maybe Royals, too) are going to wear black armbands or something in honor of Taveras for these last two games.There is no reason for the Giants or Royals to wear arm bands (league-wide memorials are reserved for elite members of the fraternity), but I'd guess they'll have a moment of silence prior to Game 6. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 Yeah I figured not. I just thought that maybe because the few games he played in against the Giants were so significant (and maybe the fact that the Royals are in the same state), they may do something. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 They shouldn't. It would be masturbatory and self-indulgent for them to wear a memorial. More about the teams than the man who passed away. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanic Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 Memorial patches are dumb, unless there's actually worth something to remember about that person (i.e "greatest player in the history of the [whatever]").Not to bash on the poor guy because he's dead, I just feel like it's not needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddball Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 Memorial patches are dumb, unless there's actually worth something to remember about that person (i.e "greatest player in the history of the [whatever]").Not to bash on the poor guy because he's dead, I just feel like it's not needed.No they aren't dumb, your statement as written was. I hope that wasn't what you really meant. As an outsider you have no idea how much a person impact others. As far as should either team do anything for the death of a Cardinals player... not really, maybe at best a moment of silence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tubby34 Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 I think each player should wear what they feel comfortable with. I could see Perez wearing a jersey number on his cap if he wants- maybe others inside the jersey over the heart on an undershirt or written on the inside of the jersey itself behind the crest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phils Phan Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 Are the Cubs keeping that POS road alternate or was that just a thing for the 100th anniversary? Phillies, Bears, and new NYFC fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonFromMiami Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Are the Cubs keeping that POS road alternate or was that just a thing for the 100th anniversary?Rumor has it that they will wait on wearing them for game 1 and 2 of the 2015 World Series. Where they will defeat my Marlins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phutmasterflex Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Are the Cubs keeping that POS road alternate or was that just a thing for the 100th anniversary?Rumor has it that they will wait on wearing them for game 1 and 2 of the 2015 World Series.Where they will defeat my Marlins Hey, Jaws 19 comes out next October too Go A's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonFromMiami Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Hell Yeah, i am super excited for that one ! Although 18 was a bit flat, dialogue felt a bit forced imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayMac Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Hell Yeah, i am super excited for that one ! Although 18 was a bit flat, dialogue felt a bit forced imo.They were all still better than Jaws 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.