CC97 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 So that NY/NJ regional logo wasn't a one off.What was new about the NY/NJ regional logo?Added bits of the city skyline to either side of the stadium... previous logos just showed the stadium behind the trophy. --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Ah, gotcha. Thanks. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman14 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 I doubt that this will be the actaul logo but it is interesting that Minnesota went with a unique logo as apposed to the same template as previous years.That's the logo for the bid committee. Soooooo there is no template for those.Yes I'm well aware that is a logo used in the proposal and there is no "template". I thought I had seen that Indianapolis had mocked up a logo as well but had used a similar format as the previous Super Bowl logos. That is all. no need for your snark. Just saw a logo that had some association with the Super Bowl but didnt think it needed a new thread. nothing more nothing less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tohasbo Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 So that NY/NJ regional logo wasn't a one off. I guess if we are stuck with this logo system I'm glad they added something unique to it. The national version will always be terrible so no change there, but the additions to the regional is nice. Good to see them change those up because the stadium alone doesn't really represent the region. Looking forward to SB 50 logo with the Golden Gate bridge and Levi's stadium.Just so y'all have a reference for the "Regional" logos since the start of this system...And the Arizona one is already posted but here it is again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Here's a better look at the SB 48 Regional mark: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
29texan Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 So that NY/NJ regional logo wasn't a one off. I guess if we are stuck with this logo system I'm glad they added something unique to it. The national version will always be terrible so no change there, but the additions to the regional is nice. Good to see them change those up because the stadium alone doesn't really represent the region. Looking forward to SB 50 logo with the Golden Gate bridge and Levi's stadium. Just so y'all have a reference for the "Regional" logos since the start of this system... [images redacted] All of these piss me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddball Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 The problem with all of these, is they feel like nothing. They don't feel like the city they represent. They don't feel like they are celebrating anything. They feel cold and uninteresting, like the league doesn't care and doesn't want you at home to care about the league or the game. The Super Bowl should be celebrated as the NFL's premier event and the logo should represent that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Noire Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 So that NY/NJ regional logo wasn't a one off. I guess if we are stuck with this logo system I'm glad they added something unique to it. The national version will always be terrible so no change there, but the additions to the regional is nice. Good to see them change those up because the stadium alone doesn't really represent the region. Looking forward to SB 50 logo with the Golden Gate bridge and Levi's stadium.Just so y'all have a reference for the "Regional" logos since the start of this system...And the Arizona one is already posted but here it is again...All of these piss me off. The problem with all of these, is they feel like nothing. They don't feel like the city they represent. They don't feel like they are celebrating anything. They feel cold and uninteresting, like the league doesn't care and doesn't want you at home to care about the league or the game. The Super Bowl should be celebrated as the NFL's premier event and the logo should represent that.Both valid points and I'm inclined to agree, but at minimum the regional from last year and now this year do make an attempt to represent the location. Personally I can live with those, but for me the problem is they are still the regional logos. They should be the national marks and should be the main logo period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old School Fool Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 The regional logo was the jersey patch for NY/NJ so it's probably gonna be that way from that point on, which is great. I understand why they have the non-detail logo though because painting that at midfield would probably be a pain in the ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soarindude Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Marketing wise, there has to be a reason why the Super Bowl turned to going with a "corporate" logo versus their old personable logos. I can't imagine why this would be the case, But I don't see why the NFL would make this decision without having an overall objective from it. Citing laziness on the NFLs part just doesn't make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Marketing wise, there has to be a reason why the Super Bowl turned to going with a "corporate" logo versus their old personable logos.I can't imagine why this would be the case, But I don't see why the NFL would make this decision without having an overall objective from it. Citing laziness on the NFLs part just doesn't make sense.They are BRANDING the Super Bowl. What can be more corporate than that? You can't have a real brand that changes its logo every year. Before this, (from a brand/logo standpoint) the Super Bowl was a year-to-year event. Super Bowl XXXI was its own event, Super Bowl XXXII was its own event, etc. Each representing 1 season, 1 city. With the consistant logo they are branding this as an annual event that is connected to each Super Bowl every year. this is THE SUPER BOWL. Not the 2003 Super Bowl, 2004 Super Bowl etc. This is THE SUPER BOWL.I know we love new and interesting logos and were always excited to see what the new logo would look like every year, but from a marketing/branding standpoint it really doesnt make sense to change a logo every year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanMcD29 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 So that NY/NJ regional logo wasn't a one off. I guess if we are stuck with this logo system I'm glad they added something unique to it. The national version will always be terrible so no change there, but the additions to the regional is nice. Good to see them change those up because the stadium alone doesn't really represent the region. Looking forward to SB 50 logo with the Golden Gate bridge and Levi's stadium.Just so y'all have a reference for the "Regional" logos since the start of this system...And the Arizona one is already posted but here it is again......so I see they finally knocked down Jobing.com Arena and replaced it with an artificial canyon. Hope they didn't touch those fountains, though Twitter: @RyanMcD29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ_Barlik Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Marketing wise, there has to be a reason why the Super Bowl turned to going with a "corporate" logo versus their old personable logos.I can't imagine why this would be the case, But I don't see why the NFL would make this decision without having an overall objective from it. Citing laziness on the NFLs part just doesn't make sense.They are BRANDING the Super Bowl. What can be more corporate than that? You can't have a real brand that changes its logo every year. Before this, (from a brand/logo standpoint) the Super Bowl was a year-to-year event. Super Bowl XXXI was its own event, Super Bowl XXXII was its own event, etc. Each representing 1 season, 1 city. With the consistant logo they are branding this as an annual event that is connected to each Super Bowl every year. this is THE SUPER BOWL. Not the 2003 Super Bowl, 2004 Super Bowl etc. This is THE SUPER BOWL.I know we love new and interesting logos and were always excited to see what the new logo would look like every year, but from a marketing/branding standpoint it really doesnt make sense to change a logo every year.You do realize that on a website dedicated to sports logos, that pretty much no one is going to agree with this line of reasoning..... 5-time Defending NL East Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old School Fool Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Marketing wise, there has to be a reason why the Super Bowl turned to going with a "corporate" logo versus their old personable logos.I can't imagine why this would be the case, But I don't see why the NFL would make this decision without having an overall objective from it. Citing laziness on the NFLs part just doesn't make sense.They are BRANDING the Super Bowl. What can be more corporate than that? You can't have a real brand that changes its logo every year. Before this, (from a brand/logo standpoint) the Super Bowl was a year-to-year event. Super Bowl XXXI was its own event, Super Bowl XXXII was its own event, etc. Each representing 1 season, 1 city. With the consistant logo they are branding this as an annual event that is connected to each Super Bowl every year. this is THE SUPER BOWL. Not the 2003 Super Bowl, 2004 Super Bowl etc. This is THE SUPER BOWL.I know we love new and interesting logos and were always excited to see what the new logo would look like every year, but from a marketing/branding standpoint it really doesnt make sense to change a logo every year.I agree and disagree at the same time. I agree on the branding of the Super Bowl in a way, but I also disagree with the logo changing every year as not working. WWE changes their Wrestlemania logo every year and it's a big brand. It can work if done right. Either way, here we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pengin. Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Man, I wish they would go back to custom logos. Anyways, that Minnesota Super Bowl committee logo is fabulous even with the gradients. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbadefense1990 Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Everything about the desert landscape in this logo is too damn small and behind. The NFL did a much better job displaying the NY/NJ background for last year's logo than they did displaying Arizona this time. Just another fail in their long laundry list of Super Bowl logo fails of the recent past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spenbrd803 Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 God! I wish the NFL would stop this ridiculous recycling the same ugly logo for the Super Bowl. I liked when they included the host team into the theme. Super Bowl 45 was ok. It was in Dallas area silver for Cowboys was good, I didn't like the design but it made sense. Now it just shows that the NFL is either too cheap or too lazy to come up with something new. The most fun thing about the Super Bowl logo being unveiled was 'oh I wonder what it'll be this year.' Now its just 'oh lets just throw on another numeral. It has become disappointing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 God! I wish the NFL would stop this ridiculous recycling the same ugly logo for the Super Bowl. I liked when they included the host team into the theme. Super Bowl 45 was ok. It was in Dallas area silver for Cowboys was good, I didn't like the design but it made sense. Now it just shows that the NFL is either too cheap or too lazy to come up with something new. The most fun thing about the Super Bowl logo being unveiled was 'oh I wonder what it'll be this year.' Now its just 'oh lets just throw on another numeral. It has become disappointing.I'm pretty sure the NFL is not cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spenbrd803 Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 rickyISking, you probably know this but I want to clarify. When I say cheap I don't mean in value I mean they put out a product that is low in cost...cheap. Not going to take much work to produce on large a scale... cheap. I know that the NFL is a multi-billion dollar business. I just didn't think that the NFL would be willing to force a logo down out throats every year, that for the last 3 years has looked shoddy at best. My 7 year old can draw up something more creative than the NFL has been able to put out in 5 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muggens Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 I can imagine there will be a different stand alone logo for Super Bowl 50 and they go back to the new branded logo afterwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.