daveindc

New Browns uni coming 2015

Recommended Posts

The new Browns logo may have just been leaked at the combine. If the leak is the real thing, the primary logo will be the dog logo with a dumbbell in its mouth.

that's been out for a while, it's iust the strength and conditioning shirt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The new Browns logo may have just been leaked at the combine. If the leak is the real thing, the primary logo will be the dog logo with a dumbbell in its mouth.

that's been out for a while, it's iust the strength and conditioning shirt.

Exactly

BlhM85MCQAEgkcs.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to see there. A lot of teams make t-shirts for their strength and conditioning programs.

Here's the Reds'

BoAdfEnIcAAstfT_zps0ejbjcsf.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So most are saying the "new" logo is just an updated helmet. Makes sense since they have a helmet outline as a twitter avatar and have been calling it an evolution. If so, it will probably be the worst rebrand attempt ever. But typical Browns.

So they might remedy their lack of a logo by not actually creating a logo. I'll admit it's ballsy. Stupid, but ballsy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So most are saying the "new" logo is just an updated helmet. Makes sense since they have a helmet outline as a twitter avatar and have been calling it an evolution. If so, it will probably be the worst rebrand attempt ever. But typical Browns.

So they might remedy their lack of a logo by not actually creating a logo. I'll admit it's ballsy. Stupid, but ballsy.

execpt the fact the president said that the new logo isn't a helemt. doesn't anyone read the sportslogos.net news. like the real site not the fourms

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing that article states is a line that says "Obviously, this means the team's helmet will no longer be the primary logo." Nothing I see in the article says that statement came from the team president.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. People just assume a team isn't that dumb to use a helmet as a logo. Only a team as stupid as the Browns would use it for almost their entire existence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO.

MinnesotaVikings_PMK0100a_2013_SCC_SRGB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO.

MinnesotaVikings_PMK0100a_2013_SCC_SRGB.

Eagles. Rams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO.

MinnesotaVikings_PMK0100a_2013_SCC_SRGB.

Eagles. Rams.
bengals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO.

MinnesotaVikings_PMK0100a_2013_SCC_SRGB.

Eagles. Rams.
bengals

134182442_20111130135307_640_480_2013061403.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO.

MinnesotaVikings_PMK0100a_2013_SCC_SRGB.

Eagles. Rams.
Falso.

456691650.0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on our local news a couple of days ago that the new Browns logo won't be on the helmet or the uniforms. I'm trying to think of a team in the NFL that doesn't use their primary logo on their helmet or somewhere on the uniform. I would just find that stupid if the Browns did that, IMO.

MinnesotaVikings_PMK0100a_2013_SCC_SRGB.

Eagles. Rams.
bengals

134182442_20111130135307_640_480_2013061403.gif

oopsies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, the question was, who doesn't have their primary logo ANYWHERE on their uniform... That's the Vikings, for sure, the Browns (until next week)(unless you count actually wearing the helmet as wearing the logo) and...

Maybe the Bears? Is this considered the primary...

354.gif

or is it the "C"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the wishbone C, technically.

edit: 14,000 posts. Wish I would've used it on something more memorable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, the question was, who doesn't have their primary logo ANYWHERE on their uniform... That's the Vikings, for sure, the Browns (until next week)(unless you count actually wearing the helmet as wearing the logo) and...

Maybe the Bears? Is this considered the primary...

354.gif

or is it the "C"?

Do the Vikings not have the logo above the nameplates any more? I always kinda liked that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if the "logo" will not be on the helmet or uniform doesn't it imply that they will just be using the helmet as the logo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.