aeargle Posted June 25, 2014 Share Posted June 25, 2014 I do not call this an NCAA thing, because for this to happen, the NCAA would be null & void.It's a "perfect (in my mind)" full scheme of a football season, if it were up to me. Essentially, there are 128 teams (I took all 128 of the teams that will be considered FBS in 2015, with the exception of Old Dominion. Sorry ODU, someone had to go to make the numbers work & geographically/selfishly, it was easiest to drop you). These 128 teams are divided into 16 conferences of 8 teams, geographically placed. Each team will play 9 regular season games - 2 OOC games & 7 conference games. The 2 OOC games allow for rivalries to continue, especially the Commander in Chief Trophy. This is where the fun starts. There is then a 128 team playoff, everybody's in. No complaining about being the first one out. Two nearby conferences will be joined together as somewhat of a geographical "cluster" and will play in a mini-16 team playoff, as pictured below:The survivor will then move on to face the survivor of the next nearest "cluster," starting an 8 team playoff to crown a national championship. This will not be a rebrand of any teams, but rather branding the concepts of the conferences & large playoff games (the last round of 8). --------------------------------------------------------------------I hope this all makes some sense in other people's heads, it makes sense in mine. Any thoughts? Dribbble | Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clintau24 Posted June 25, 2014 Share Posted June 25, 2014 I don't think there's a perfect situation whatsoever for this, but this is probably as close as possible. I like the smaller regular season schedule. I have hated the talk about keeping a 12/13 game season then a 64 team bracket and what not. No team should have to play nearly 20 games, and they shouldn't get near the number of games the NFL plays. I'm very intrigued by all 128 teams getting in to the party. "I believe in Auburn and love it!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pianoknight Posted June 25, 2014 Share Posted June 25, 2014 I don't think there's a perfect situation whatsoever for this, but this is probably as close as possible. I like the smaller regular season schedule. I have hated the talk about keeping a 12/13 game season then a 64 team bracket and what not. No team should have to play nearly 20 games, and they shouldn't get near the number of games the NFL plays. I'm very intrigued by all 128 teams getting in to the party. I'm actually on the other side of the aisle, here.If all 128 teams make the cut, the first 9 games of the season are meaningless. Football stands apart from sports like baseball and basketball in that regard. You can't just randomly lose a game or two and expect to make the post-season. 5th in NAT. TITLES | 2nd in CONF. TITLES | 5th in HEISMAN | 7th in DRAFTS | 8th in ALL-AMER | 7th in WINS | 4th in BOWLS | 1st in SELLOUTS | 1st GAMEDAY SIGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kansas sports fan Posted June 25, 2014 Share Posted June 25, 2014 Laray3 did the exact same thing as you except for he 8 conferences of 2 divisions of 8 teams, they played one more ooc game, and only the top team from each division made the playoffs, so I don't exactly appreciate this. Acts 16:31 - And they replied: "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you and your household."John 3:16 - "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him shall not perish, but have everlasting life."John 14:6 - Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father, except through me." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewTheDewd Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 I like your idea. To help cut it down, I suggest that only half of the conference teams make it to playoffs, or maybe even three. The start the regional battles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOppenheimer Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 What would even be he point of conferences? Noah Oppenheimerbaseballonly on OOTP ForumsPhillies GM in Max Modern BaseballMMB Phillies Blog--League BlogIronPigs GM in Continental Baseball League Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDGP Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 What would even be he point of conferences?That's actually a pretty good point. Using this method creates a situation that will be logistically unfair.By forcing all teams in a conference to play one another before moving on, it'd mean that an extremely strong conference like the SEC would have a maximum of 1 team competing for the national championship. Since the SEC has at least 3 teams in the running for the national championship (in the now defunct BCS method), your method would eliminate those teams from competing for the championship, while weaker conferences could send a team that doesn't really deserve to be competing for a championship into the final 8.If you are insistent on keeping every team in the running, I'd suggest splitting the conferences where each team is from a different conference, and the #1 from conference A plays the #8 from conference H. #2B plays #7G. etc, and then rotate that so that in the next 8, #1 B plays #8 H. This would keep the basic idea you have in the first round, but it would spread out the teams, and allow the best teams to compete against one another in the later rounds, even if they are in the same conference. I've got a dribbble, check it out if you like my stuff; alternatively, if you hate my stuff, send it to your enemies to punish their insolence! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeargle Posted June 26, 2014 Author Share Posted June 26, 2014 Laray3 did the exact same thing as you except for he 8 conferences of 2 divisions of 8 teams, they played one more ooc game, and only the top team from each division made the playoffs, so I don't exactly appreciate this.I take it that you don't like multiple NFL team concepts as well then?What would even be he point of conferences?That's actually a pretty good point. Using this method creates a situation that will be logistically unfair.By forcing all teams in a conference to play one another before moving on, it'd mean that an extremely strong conference like the SEC would have a maximum of 1 team competing for the national championship. Since the SEC has at least 3 teams in the running for the national championship (in the now defunct BCS method), your method would eliminate those teams from competing for the championship, while weaker conferences could send a team that doesn't really deserve to be competing for a championship into the final 8.If you are insistent on keeping every team in the running, I'd suggest splitting the conferences where each team is from a different conference, and the #1 from conference A plays the #8 from conference H. #2B plays #7G. etc, and then rotate that so that in the next 8, #1 B plays #8 H. This would keep the basic idea you have in the first round, but it would spread out the teams, and allow the best teams to compete against one another in the later rounds, even if they are in the same conference.I see where you guys are coming from, for sure.But, the SEC could potentially have up to 4 teams in the final 8, I'd say that's pretty decent odds. As I look at it, it could be Mizzou/Ark in 1, Georgia/Bama/Auburn/Tenn/Kentucky/Vandy in 1, Florida/SC in 1, & LSU/MissSt/OleMiss/A&M in 1. So based on last year's results: Mizzou (East Champ), SC (East runner up), Auburn (National Runner Up) & LSU/A&M (Not sure off the top of my head who'd take that). The purpose of the conferences is to give all teams at least 9 games & to determine the seeding of the tournament. If you randomly put them in, you could potentially have Alabama vs Georgia in the first round. Plus it will keep the local rivalry games intact - Clem/SCar, UGA/GT, UGA/Aub, Aub/Bama, FSU/Florida, FSU/Miami, etc. Dribbble | Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOppenheimer Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 What would even be he point of conferences?That's actually a pretty good point. Using this method creates a situation that will be logistically unfair.By forcing all teams in a conference to play one another before moving on, it'd mean that an extremely strong conference like the SEC would have a maximum of 1 team competing for the national championship. Since the SEC has at least 3 teams in the running for the national championship (in the now defunct BCS method), your method would eliminate those teams from competing for the championship, while weaker conferences could send a team that doesn't really deserve to be competing for a championship into the final 8.If you are insistent on keeping every team in the running, I'd suggest splitting the conferences where each team is from a different conference, and the #1 from conference A plays the #8 from conference H. #2B plays #7G. etc, and then rotate that so that in the next 8, #1 B plays #8 H. This would keep the basic idea you have in the first round, but it would spread out the teams, and allow the best teams to compete against one another in the later rounds, even if they are in the same conference.I see where you guys are coming from, for sure.But, the SEC could potentially have up to 4 teams in the final 8, I'd say that's pretty decent odds. As I look at it, it could be Mizzou/Ark in 1, Georgia/Bama/Auburn/Tenn/Kentucky/Vandy in 1, Florida/SC in 1, & LSU/MissSt/OleMiss/A&M in 1. So based on last year's results: Mizzou (East Champ), SC (East runner up), Auburn (National Runner Up) & LSU/A&M (Not sure off the top of my head who'd take that). The purpose of the conferences is to give all teams at least 9 games & to determine the seeding of the tournament. If you randomly put them in, you could potentially have Alabama vs Georgia in the first round. Plus it will keep the local rivalry games intact - Clem/SCar, UGA/GT, UGA/Aub, Aub/Bama, FSU/Florida, FSU/Miami, etc.Yes--the SEC always has good odds. They have the best teams, that's how it's supposed to be.EDIT: Cut out a bit of the quote to save space. Noah Oppenheimerbaseballonly on OOTP ForumsPhillies GM in Max Modern BaseballMMB Phillies Blog--League BlogIronPigs GM in Continental Baseball League Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeargle Posted June 26, 2014 Author Share Posted June 26, 2014 Laray3 did the exact same thing as you except for he 8 conferences of 2 divisions of 8 teams, they played one more ooc game, and only the top team from each division made the playoffs, so I don't exactly appreciate this.I take it that you don't like multiple NFL team concepts as well then?What would even be he point of conferences?That's actually a pretty good point. Using this method creates a situation that will be logistically unfair.By forcing all teams in a conference to play one another before moving on, it'd mean that an extremely strong conference like the SEC would have a maximum of 1 team competing for the national championship. Since the SEC has at least 3 teams in the running for the national championship (in the now defunct BCS method), your method would eliminate those teams from competing for the championship, while weaker conferences could send a team that doesn't really deserve to be competing for a championship into the final 8.If you are insistent on keeping every team in the running, I'd suggest splitting the conferences where each team is from a different conference, and the #1 from conference A plays the #8 from conference H. #2B plays #7G. etc, and then rotate that so that in the next 8, #1 B plays #8 H. This would keep the basic idea you have in the first round, but it would spread out the teams, and allow the best teams to compete against one another in the later rounds, even if they are in the same conference.I see where you guys are coming from, for sure.But, the SEC could potentially have up to 4 teams in the final 8, I'd say that's pretty decent odds. As I look at it, it could be Mizzou/Ark in 1, Georgia/Bama/Auburn/Tenn/Kentucky/Vandy in 1, Florida/SC in 1, & LSU/MissSt/OleMiss/A&M in 1. So based on last year's results: Mizzou (East Champ), SC (East runner up), Auburn (National Runner Up) & LSU/A&M (Not sure off the top of my head who'd take that). The purpose of the conferences is to give all teams at least 9 games & to determine the seeding of the tournament. If you randomly put them in, you could potentially have Alabama vs Georgia in the first round. Plus it will keep the local rivalry games intact - Clem/SCar, UGA/GT, UGA/Aub, Aub/Bama, FSU/Florida, FSU/Miami, etc.Yes--the SEC always has good odds. They have the best teams, that's how it's supposed to be.I don't disagree. I was just pointing out to Lafarge that they will not only have 1 team in the hunt for the national title. Dribbble | Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slammersman Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 9 regular season games are fine if you add each confernce having a championship game for a 10th game then the 16 team playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Are you planning to include any VISUAL additions, such as the branding of your conferences to this thread? Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOppenheimer Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Are you planning to include any VISUAL additions, such as the branding of your conferences to this thread?I was just waiting for someone to say this. Noah Oppenheimerbaseballonly on OOTP ForumsPhillies GM in Max Modern BaseballMMB Phillies Blog--League BlogIronPigs GM in Continental Baseball League Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeargle Posted June 27, 2014 Author Share Posted June 27, 2014 First up: The Bourbon ConferenceAppalachian StateTennesseeVanderbiltMemphisMiddle Tennessee StateKentuckyWestern KentuckyLouisville Dribbble | Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Critical Thinker Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Let me be the first to say "BAC" is a very fitting acronym for the alcohol conference. It's _____________ and Toledo still sucks.[insert time here] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOppenheimer Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Not exactly digging the conference name...a lot of college players are under 21. Noah Oppenheimerbaseballonly on OOTP ForumsPhillies GM in Max Modern BaseballMMB Phillies Blog--League BlogIronPigs GM in Continental Baseball League Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan O'Mac Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Not exactly digging the conference name...a lot of college players are under 21.I agree. I'd maybe pull from the geography, go with something associated with the Cumberland Mountain range, which extends into both Kentucky and Tennessee.Also, Appalachian State is the only non-Kentucky or Tennessee team. How did they get selected for that? Asking because Cincinnati is literally on the border of Ohio and Kentucky. Not that it matters, since it appears we aren't getting team logos. Unless you're planning something like the B1G uses for their basketball midcourt logo. I like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brfrank9 Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 I agree with pianoknight. One outcome of any regular season should be to separate good teams from bad ones.aergle, Why play 9 regular season games when all 128 teams would make the playoffs anyway?I suggest determining a lower number for the number of teams that qualify for the playoffs and then developing some rules to determine how teams qualify for the playoffs.Also, I am not a fan of alcohol reference for the conference you introduced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.