NOppenheimer

Stolen Work

Recommended Posts

This looks familiar.  I saw it on a van earlier this morning.

 

spacer.png

 

 

 

spacer.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, leopard88 said:

This looks familiar.  I saw it on a van earlier this morning.

 

spacer.png

 

 

 

 

The misspelling just hurts my eyes. Why would you leave out the second 'e'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sec19Row53 said:

The misspelling just hurts my eyes. Why would you leave out the second 'e'?

Probably due to filing legally for the name...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, AstroBull21 said:

Probably due to filing legally for the name...

So the assumption is that it's WWE-style 🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Driving down the road in Dallas yesterday and saw this logo on a work truck. Funnily enough, the company's current website shows a different 100th year logo. I imagine they received a C&D from the folks in Toronto...

 

spacer.png

This webpage shows the current 100 year logo, which is way better given their market space, as well as their 95 year logo which reminds me of a hybrid TBL/NJD anniversary logo.

 

Cornwell Tools- History

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it is a lot better than the gross throwback script they like to use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Mockba said:

Well, it is a lot better than the gross throwback script they like to use.

 

@Gothamite once made the argument that part of the reason why the throwback script looks so terrible is due to poor digitization.

 

 

5443214%5D,sizedata%5B850x600%5D&call=ur

 

It's not like the '59-'60 Senationaltors or the 2010-present Twins were incapable of making a good cursive script:

 

10024553433_31f7fef0ea_c.jpg1948_washington_senators-jersey-1959.pngf86vbej5phhdglbekrbr9ia9t.png

 

That "Minnesota" script should have been the base for a new "Twins" script, akin to mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From time to time I spot ren69's work used by others.  No money or products is involved with this one but I got a kick out of it (upper right if you're not familiar).  
spacer.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/13/2019 at 11:15 PM, Earl said:

From time to time I spot ren69's work used by others.  No money or products is involved with this one but I got a kick out of it (upper right if you're not familiar).  spacer.png

LOL I remember requesting that design when he was doing his redesign thread awhile back. I was going to school at the Ohio University - Zanesville campus for a year when he made it. I like how they didn't even crop the design itself. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A local highschool down in PA is using a ripped version of Fraser Davidson's Redskins logo as their main mascot:

mZ5edua.jpg

Davidson's work for comparison:

zpM6zIL.png

 

I know they're selling merch with this stolen/tweaked logo on it as well, but I can't find any images to back that up. Have seen it while going to games though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a prototype logo for the Atlanta Falcons?

 

spacer.png

 

Nope.  It's the logo for HC Falcons Brixen/Bresdanone, of the Italian hockey League, second division.

 

spacer.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2019/12/09/a-st-louis-artists-smash-the-patriarchy-image-went-viral-then-a-man-copied-it

 

Quote

To Kat Kissick, the image in her Google search was unmistakable: A digital illustration of a feminine head formed by flowers and framed by a caption on top that began, "Roses are red, knowledge is power," and continued below, "Stomp out the patriarchy you beautiful flower." 

She immediately recognized it as a ripoff of her own work, an illustration she'd drawn in late 2018 that had gone viral on Facebook, where it had been shared 17,000 times and from which Kissick had sold T-shirts, prints and postcards. 

The irony of discovering a copycat image drawn by a male artist, named Karl Frey, was also impossible to miss, and to Kissick, kind of hilarious. After all, "the patriarchy" is a term often used to describe the unearned benefits society ascribes to men due to generations of gender inequality — and here seemed a perfect example of that sort of patriarchal entitlement in action. 

             

                                Original                                                                Copy

 

]spacer.png

I particularly liked this paragraph:

 

Quote

"I asked if there wasn’t a T-shirt of it already available and my wife’s boss said that there wasn’t," Frey wrote, though he also acknowledged that he hadn't asked where the design had come from. He added that he had "enjoyed the challenge" of redrawing the image, and noted that he had tried to change "at least twenty percent" of Kissick's illustration in order to create "an original work and not a simple derivative of your design." 

 

 

Isn't that a straight out admission of theft?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Sport Billy said:

https://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2019/12/09/a-st-louis-artists-smash-the-patriarchy-image-went-viral-then-a-man-copied-it

 

             

                                Original                                                                Copy

 

]spacer.png

I particularly liked this paragraph:

 

"I asked if there wasn’t a T-shirt of it already available and my wife’s boss said that there wasn’t," Frey wrote, though he also acknowledged that he hadn't asked where the design had come from. He added that he had "enjoyed the challenge" of redrawing the image, and noted that he had tried to change "at least twenty percent" of Kissick's illustration in order to create "an original work and not a simple derivative of your design." 

 

Isn't that a straight out admission of theft?

It is - but it is the 'popular opinion' of what you have to do to make it ok. People are dumb and don't think this is theft, although it clearly is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He only changed 2 out of 13 words, guess he didn't hit his 20% mark /sarcasm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.