Eszcz21

11 minutes ago, MCM0313 said:

I suspect t that would offend some people. 

Well they can be offended. There is nothing offensive about this.

21 hours ago, Old School Fool said:

 

Can't forget this amazing alternate.

 

The Nuggets should of made a white uniform and light blue uniform based off these and they could of had an incredible set.

21 hours ago, kimball said:

 

Not to mention, I believe the Nuggets were also the first NBA club to start the trend of simply recoloring the logo instead of designing a new one? Or was it the Pistons? If I remember correctly this was because the NBA began charging something like $500,000 for logo changes?  Of course, of the significant changes the Jazz (twice), Hawks, Wizards, Bobcats, Bucks, Raptors, etc.  followed suit. 

 

That said, the 2003 change for the Nuggets was much better than the original logo from 1993. 

The Pistons did it before the Nuggets, they recolored the horse for the 2001-02 season. 

7 minutes ago, DCarp1231 said:

How often does the league change templates?  There should be some type of restriction on that as well. If a team has to wait 5 years for a change, Nike should have to wait 5 years to implement a league-wide template change.

That appears to be the timeline Nike follows. Since Nike took over as NFL supplier: Elite 51 2012-2016, Vapor Untouchable 2017-2022, Vapor Fusion 2023-???

The horn on the red helmet and red jersey need white inside of them.

12 hours ago, TrueYankee26 said:

At least it would makes sense for Minnesota and any other Upper Midwest team if they did that because of the climate *runs before tomatoes goes my direction*

Yeah but what about when they wear them week 1 in September when its 75 degrees

No black and the current logo. Also looks like white is back in the helmet stripe

That is not the old logo. It's a silhouette of the current logo. You can tell by the nose.

Jaguars' throwback announcement.

8 minutes ago, CaliforniaGlowin said:

See that make sense for them because their name represents gold.

Chrome does not equal gold.

I'm starting to wonder if the Lions have the black hat because they are hosting the draft? They are the only team with a third hat design.

5 minutes ago, HOOVER said:

I’d be shocked if they did, as it would have been added back into the primary logo and it hasn’t been.

 

Black as a Color Rush alt?  Fair chance.  But the logo still doesn’t jive - I would bet they’ll retain last year’s Blue alt helmet for whatever they do with that uniform.

 

Prediction:  Barry Sanders-era primary Home & Away sets, longstanding Thanksgiving Throwbacks, and an all-Blue, modern Color Rush uni that works with last year’s Blue helmet.

If your prediction came true I'd be beyond thrilled. The Barry era with the current logo is my dream. I know sadly they're going to force mono white and mono blue in some how. I do hope the thanksgiving throwbacks survive.

29 minutes ago, GFB said:

 

I don’t think that’s going to be the case as the coaching staff and on-field apparel has been mainly black for sometime with blackout logos being normal.

 

Black is simply a popular color for apparel, especially for big guys.

 

 

I hope you are right but I'm definitely fearing that they're going to bring black back.

40 minutes ago, Sec19Row53 said:

Doesn't it have to so that it's a team color and they can then make the black alt?

That was my thought as well. I thought that was part of the reason Washington shoe horned black into the away uniforms.

I really hope they don't have black mixed into the green uniforms but I have a bad feeling they are.

9 hours ago, GoHawks said:

Be careful what you wish for. I’ve heard rumors that next year the Lions will have black alternate uniforms. Not sure if it will be black jerseys with gray pants like it was in the past or mono black uniforms but I’m guessing it will be the latter.

Can I ask where you are hearing this rumor?

Michigan going old school and bringing back the shoulder patches for the Rose Bowl with the maize pants too! I love it.

Thankfully the Lions are wearing their throwbacks based off the reveal of the John Madden patch all teams will be wearing tomorrow.

3 hours ago, canzman said:

Lions @ Bears

 

You need to fix this one. The Lions are home this week. It should be Bears @ Lions.

21 hours ago, Michael Bolton said:

 

They only wore the blue tops a total of two (2) times in their two seasons as the Tennessee Oilers. And both instances were on the road: at Miami and at Dallas. So they wouldn't have much of a connection with these throwbacks anyway.

I've always wondered was there ever an explanation for them wearing white at home those first two years in Tennessee? Besides "heat".

Lions in their normal home uniforms thankfully.

 https://x.com/lions/status/1702844885814923399?s=46&t=2d8U07AZDKwgaM9_vOGhHA

33 minutes ago, throwuascenario said:

 

Which team that currently uses navy would not be better off changing to royal or black?

Michigan, Penn State, Red Sox, Illinois.

So,  Nike just plans on making the NFL as NBA as possible. I feel like most teams that make a uniform change are going to start having home and road uniforms that are completely different from each other than an alternate that has nothing to do with them as well instead of everything just being a color swap.  I'm absolutely terrified of what the Lions are going to look like when they get new uniforms, I'd rather them just stick to what they have now if they're not going to just go back to the Barry Sanders uniforms with the current logo. 

12 minutes ago, DCarp1231 said:

Since a lot of people associate uniforms with players that wore them, would this be considered the “Kerrigan Era Set”?

I'd leave it up to Purdue fans, but I definitely associate them with Kerrigan or Kyle Orton. Even though the Orton uniforms had the logo on the sleeve and numbers on the shoulder.