Rocky Raccoon

1 hour ago, Ice_Cap said:

The Dolphins have a cruise ship-esque logo and identity. That’s why the throwbacks are so appealing. 

If the new logo is cruise ship-esque (whatever that means) what does that make the shriveled up on the shore looking logo from the ‘60s?

I really like both looks, but there’s a reason that original logo was updated over the years.

11 hours ago, insert name said:

because for teams like the Rams and Dolphins, their current set just doesn't stack up compared to the throwbacks. Especially the Rams who are wearing a top that doesn't match the pants or helmet. 

I agree with the Rams but they’re a different case because their current uniforms have been made a mess with the  different color horns on the helmet versus the jersey. They’re also getting new uniforms anyway.

The Bills-Dolphins game looked really awesome with both teams wearing their old school uniforms.

That being said, I still don't understand the constant chanting of so many people to make everything retro new again. These uniforms are great serving their purpose as a special treat. A turn-back-the-clock change up. In my unpopular opinion, they should be left in that role. Keep the current uniforms as the current uniforms and the throwbacks as a once or twice a season alternate uniform. 

And that goes for pretty much all of these teams, not just the Bills and Dolphins. Every time a professional team wears throwback jerseys there are fans hollering to make them the regular uniforms. I just don't understand it.

NONE of the knock off sites have the newer Mets jerseys without the black drop shadow. You would think they'd pick up on that by now. The Mets got rid of the black in the jerseys a year ago.

I will say counterfeit's have gotten much better over the past few years. I remember how blatantly awful they used to be. Now, some look pretty good.

What I don't understand, and forgive me if this has been brought up before, but how come these websites have not been shut down yet? You'd think the leagues would be all over that, no?