Jump to content

The Impaler

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Impaler

  1. Denver Broncos:  They need to go back to Royal blue and have a more traditional striping pattern.  I'd like to see them keep the current primary, but replace that stupid robohorse secondary logo with an updated version of the D logo.  Along the lines of this concept.  Sorry, can't seem to add the pictures.  This concept doesn't address it, but would like to see orange more prominently on the road as well.  The current roads are predominantly blue from when they were wearing blue jerseys as primary.



  2. On 7/13/2020 at 6:29 PM, dylanjf83 said:

    Denver Broncos

    The Broncos see a clash of old school and new school, as a Bronco jumping through a D returns. Very similar to the Color Rush uniforms, with a different font used across the set.



    I don't find this logo appealing at all.  First off, that secondary logo of theirs just needs to see the bottom of a trash bin.  Second, shoehorning it into a D just doesn't work.  Also not fond of the shape of that D, it's too square.  Lastly, when you think of Colorado, one of the things is bright blue skies, I'd go with more of a royal blue to match.  Like the striping pattern and font.  

  3. On 12/5/2020 at 7:54 PM, YungMan said:

    Thanks, I appreciate you commenting and keeping up with my concepts.

    Next up is Denver, and I would not say I made too many radical changes to their uniform. Essentially it was a marriage between their orange crush years and their modern uniforms. I actually like their older shade of blue better but I am not sure if they would be different enough to warrant a concept. If anyone has any comments or criticisms on this concept or previous ones I'd be happy to hear them.


    Home Uniform



    Home Uniform with Blue Jersey



    Away Uniform




    As a life long Broncos fan I really wish they would scrap the navy!  I say follow your instincts and go with a brighter blue.  Colorado is characterized by bright blue skies, it baffles me they continue to stick with such a dark, drab shade of blue.  I'd love it if they went almost to more of a Boise St blue.  I like the return to a more traditional uniform and love the updated D logo.  For me, I love that logo more than their new, but I like the new better on the helmet if that makes sense.  Would love to see Denver uses this logo as a prominent secondary logo.

  4. I don’t know. While I really appreciate the creativity of it, I feel the monogram is off. The E could almost read as an F and the whole symmetry is way off when in the diamond. Furthermore, if you’re bent on using the tree frog I’d almost rather have the identity flipped. Tree Frogs being the name and maybe EC as the secondary. JMO of course. I hate criticizing any of your designs as they’re in general just fantastic. 

  5. Wow!  It’s been awhile since I’ve perused the concepts forum. This thread is a delight. I love all the identities but the Mets one stands out to me. Maybe it’s because I’m a Husker fan and like the simple two tone uniforms.  1 color and white. It’s not my favorite name per se, but the whole thing is just great. 

  6. I'm not a big fan of the new monogram, especially the gap between the C and R.  Did you consider maybe just having a C?  It's such a thick font that I think just having a C would fill plenty of space on the hat.  Not exactly in love with the font though.


    Love dropping black completely, good call.


    Like the overall uniform aesthetic.


    On the word mark, the spacing in the ROCKIES is really bothering me, it rather looks more like R O CKIES to me.  

  7. I can nitpick with Nebraska.  Hate the slashes thru the stripes, not enough red, why does grey or black have to be added to everything?  Other than that, one of their better looks.  Someone on the Husker board was trying to tell me (when I took exception to the stripe slashes) that it's because their logo is 3 stripes.  Um. okay.  Not sure I buy that one.  Even if I did it's still a lame design element.  

  8. 7 hours ago, AstroBull21 said:

    It wouldn't surprise me that the photo of the field design isn't complete.  It may need another coat of purple and a gold outline on the white.


    They don't paint field turf.  The "grass" is manufactured in that color.  Then they come in and shave out the numbers and place them in.  Same with the word marks and logos.

  9. On February 1, 2016 at 11:13 PM, dsaline97 said:

    It's navy. The turf was probably discolored/different lighting in the last pic, but this one shows it more clearly.IMG_2103.jpg


    Well, I disagree.  That doesn't even look close to navy to me.  Now, then end zone isn't even painted per this video at the 1:43 mark.  Someone screwed up somewhere.

  10. 14 hours ago, pitt6pack said:


    Interesting that they used a different blue in the teambox than the endzone for the Broncos. It also looks like they removed the Broncos logo that they originally had in the teambox and painted a larger one.


    Here's my update then


    noticed that too.  Wonder if it's just an oversight or if it could be a hint that the Broncos are lightening their blue next year.  The last part is really just wishful thinking on my part.

  11. In all honesty, I really like that Jet logo. Center it a bit more on the helmet and make white contrails coming out instead of the green swath and you're on to something. As Mr Wonka stated, I agree that the light green isn't all that pleasant. Two greens could work, but not that one, experiment with some more pleasant shades.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.