MrAstrodome

1 hour ago, 655321 said:

 

Double down on the navy *and* add another shade of blue!

It Patriots South not Texans North!

3 hours ago, rfraser85 said:

 

Maybe for one team, but both Texas teams are doing that now. At least the Giants' uniforms are basic enough that it's not a big stretch and use the same colors. When I see the Cowboys in navy, I've had to remind myself more than once who they are.

3 hours ago, Germanshepherd said:

Oh for sure. I don’t get at all why the Texans decided to swerve away from the horns on the blue jersey. 
 

The Cowboys works because they don’t want to wear the Navys anyways, so it being a change of pace designwise tracks. 
 

As for their mismatched blues, ideally I’d have them fix it, but I respect how they’ve kept it that way so long.

If the sleeves horns were red with the insert being white I would love the navy primary a lot more.

I just wanted the primary to be red...

As for the Cowboys, blame the Toughening for widening the desync. It started in 81 and got worse in 96.

1 hour ago, rfraser85 said:

 

I like the blue socks idea to bookend the uniform. The sleeve change could work too, but the pant stripes would also need to be changed because they were designed to match the sleeves.

Blue helmet and socks with the current road set would work as is. It the stripes were blue it would be too blue heavy I think.

I'm guessing gold, athletic or otherwise  is too similar to the Sparks?

Kinda wish Madden had the WFT jerseys to combine with their current helmet and end it from there.

Part of me says drop the T and be Warhogs but that too 90's.  And volatile.

Jersey's alright, cap sucks.

2 hours ago, tBBP said:

 

So what are they gonna call this...the "Black Hole" look??

2 hours ago, McCall said:

Blacking Out in Vegas

2 hours ago, DCarp1231 said:

Vegas Flights Blacked Out Nights

Always bet on Black.

8 minutes ago, TruColor said:

But then again, I'd change the Yankees uniforms if they'd let me, so...

What would have in mind? Any plans for a concept?

Found this triple mismatch on twitter.

After digesting the unveiling, these are my thoughts.

Pros

• Not as disjointed as I thought it be. Thankfully it's no Dallas.
• I like the brighter red.
• I like the red bull helmets.
• At least we have stripes on all pants albeit incomplete.
• OK with the Old English H. My mother and brother don't like it.
• Unpopular opinion: I do like the number font. It has grown on me. It's on all jerseys giving them all one unifying element. 
• Red jersey is ok. Like the previous set, it's actually symmetrical with the white. 
• I do like the Color Rush though I wish that jersey was light blue but I guess the BESFs threw a pi$$y, hissy fit.
• At least H-Town is only on one jersey.

Cons

• NAVY IS STILL THE DAMN PRIMARY.
• The primary is the most basic of all basic. Now we look like a Bears ripoff
• Navy numerals on the away.
• Two navy helmets? Should be just one navy candy-colored paint swapping the decals. Should have used white or light blue for the third.
• Like what we seen with the Broncos sample, Texans will probably wear yoga pants with in every combo like they did a most of last year.  I was one of the ones that said last year "Hey, the Cards were OK outside the college wordmark, maybe they'll wear them in good combos". Boy was I wrong.

6.9/10. May buy Madden to play with combos.

19 minutes ago, coborjobs2010 said:

I saw this about an interview Cal did this morning, "For those wishing a different uniform was home or away, the league basically told them which ones they had to use for home/away."
Seems like most Houstonians prefer the red as well, but I guess it wasn't possible?

And navy's the primary again. Ugh.

6 minutes ago, paul_mucus said:

All I see with the darker blue is UTEP.

Or UTSA.

12 minutes ago, M59 said:

You type that like it's a bad thing! IMO there are several teams that should take a hard look at their late 90s kits...and then revive them. YMMV.

It's not a bad thing. Just an observation. I love actually the game combos.

Especially since the current Mariners are that nice midpoint between the colorfulness of the late 80's/early 90's (teal) and the darker mid to late nineties (royal -> navy).

3 hours ago, SportsFan12 said:

Loved this uniform matchup in Colorado yesterday. 

 

The definition of the the 90's.

Just now, MCM0313 said:

With blue socks that’s passable. With trash white socks it looks like Boise State. 

Blame Color Rush. The answer is always Color Rush.

1 minute ago, MCM0313 said:

Royal blue isn’t intimidating and aggressive like navy. Or some other bullscheise explanation.  

Traces of the Toughening remain. With the shine of championship victory.

7 minutes ago, Germanshepherd said:

The far left combo is the only properly color balanced one here. 
 

They theoretically could wear blue socks with white pants, orange with blue, and blue with orange, but there’s gotta be a reason they’re not showing it. 
 

Like the Cardinals last year, believe these teams when they show you the combos. They’re not gonna mix in match in any way that looks good to us. 

 

Far right's not to shabby either. It's the only other one that has contrasting pants and socks. Depends on how you feel on the white helmet.

I say not bad on the Broncos. On the other hand this does legitimize the leaks.

Please let the red be the primary....

9 minutes ago, NH4 said:

 

“Icy like the frozen Tundra of Lambeau Field” I can see it now

 

1 minute ago, DCarp1231 said:

We’ll definitely see more monochrome and less good combinations like blue over silver

Sadly yes.

@Chi-Tex_Kidd  You have chosen violence today.

As for Detroit,  I'll parrot everyone here. Stripes need to be on the other pants, all in all good. Blue/Black/Blue/Black will go hard.

7 minutes ago, ManillaToad said:

Oh God they're going to subject us to a year of "Lol the Stars are playing Hockey Team " before we even get to whatever terrible collective noun they choose as a name

I think the reason a lot of Texans fans like the newer stuff is because like Orange Crush and the Creamcicles, the now-old set represents futility.  Not getting past the divisionals.  An endless quarterback carousel that has just now seemingly ended. Wasted hall of fame careers. Easterby.

All with a uniform that could be for any team, a color scheme overused in sports in general (including 3 teams with some extras in the NFL, our archrival being one of them) and a name that would have fit 70 years ago but not the time in which the team was founded when we were expecting something more local.

Plus replacing an identity that is apotheosized even on these boards, is a tough sell.

I'll wait to see whole thing in action.

38 minutes ago, bowld said:

I need to see the full uniform before making final call.

 

Lets just be happy we didnt get H-TOWN on the helmet

Look closer on the bumper...

So the unis live up to the statement. Now we just got to see the pants.

2 minutes ago, GriffinM6 said:

Oh no, it's a great helmet. Most people here would agree I think. It works because the red is so dark. The Jags took this idea and failed miserably. 

Also works because it's a horizontal gradient with the same finish.

18 minutes ago, rfraser85 said:

 

Yeah, Washington should have left the uniforms alone once the Native American imagery was removed. There was nothing wrong with those uniforms, and I could easily see Washington changing back to them the first chance they get. They probably can't go back to being the (Commanders), but the uniforms should be acceptable.

They're probably choosing a name behind the scenes. We'll see the classic uni again. Clock got reset with the sale. 

16 minutes ago, Pharos04 said:

so if they continue to do typical Jets stuff, can we refer to them as the ZT3Ls?

Z! T! 3! L!  ZT3LS! ZT3LS! ZT3LS!