Jump to content

jigokusabre

Members
  • Posts

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jigokusabre

  1. In what sense are you "collecting jerseys" if you're buying knockoffs? It's not a collection... it's a facsimile. It would be a like my showing off my awesome baseball card collection by printing:

    1952-mickey-mantle-rookie-card.jpg

    Would it be dumb of me to spend $100K of my hard earned money for a piece of ink and cardboard? Yeah, you could make that argument... and it would be perfectly reasonable. Collecting as a hobby is a bit ridiculous when you think about it logically. The value of collecting, though, is in getting something that is difficult to find. If you have a stockpile of fake jerseys (or self-printed baseball cards) you're not a collector... you're a poser.

    • Like 2
  2. You're telling me the Champion era replicas are the same quality as the current NBA replicas?

    Labor costs haven't gone up? Minimum wage has gone up from 5.25 in 2001 to 7.25 today. And yes, replica jerseys were printed in the United States by Reebok (not sure about Nike) So assuming all labor makes minimum wage in the US, that alone has gone up.

    You can defiantly argue that labor costs have not increased overseas and you may or may not be right, I don't know that for sure. But the costs have certainly gone up from the factory to the supplier.

    What about all the other cost increases I listed out? Should companies eat those?

    So, that accounts for a ~35% increase in cost. What accounts for the 150% increase in price?

  3. Saw this in another thread:

    OTL about counterfeit jerseys

    Great piece and some good points. I owned a sporting apparel store from 1994 until 2001. I haven't purchased and NFL jersey since then. The NFL can complain all they want, but expecting people to spend 100 bucks on a flimsy cheaply made screen printed jersey is ridicoulous.

    $100 would be fine for an authentic jersey. They want $300 for the authentic though... that's insane.

    • Like 1
  4. Just out of curiosity, does everyone here that mercilessly flames people for saving money and getting jerseys on eBay, etc, all pay for all the music they listen to?

    I'm aware it's a bit different.

    Well, buying a fake jersey is less like downloading and MP3 and more like holding a tape recorder to the radio.

    I will never flame someone for buying a jersey second hand. The licencing fees (which lets face it, is the real cost-factor) for MLB/NFL jerseys prices them out of any semblance of a reasonable price range. Besides, I'd rather buy an actual jersey from the Marlins 1993 season on eBay than hope that M&N or Majestic will eventually make a throwback (and probably botch, it too).

    There's a line between buying smart and buying knock-offs.

  5. its a well executed idea with an aesthetic that fits traditional baseball and includes some of their past visual equity. its appropriate, timeless, well built, will look great and be consistent across all applications and gives them a modern identity that replaces a sloppy, overly complex, turn of the century identity. the new colors help separate them from almost every other MLB team giving them something that is really unique and memorable.

    It seems lazy to me, too. Standard block letter/number font and the old Star H logo. There seems to be little imagination, little "design" involved. It looks very "generic" to me. You could not say the same of, say, the New Bobcats jerseys, or the new look Marlins. Even if you think they're terrible, they're not "lazy."

    That being said, if you like the boring, generic and dated... you're going to say that it looks "clean" and "traditional" and "timeless," because those are the virtues that appeal to you.

  6. Even Wrigley Field is corporately sponsored.

    bzzzt

    I know what he's trying to say about Nationals Park and Marlins Park, though. They do just sound like mere placeholders. You'd expect such massive and modern structures to have names of their own, not just "(Team Name) Park," especially considering these massive engines of commerce aren't terribly parklike. Yankee Stadium works because we're used to it and because it uses the singular instead of the plural (not that Marlin Park would be much better). "Capital Diamond" is my preference for the Nationals' park, rather than, well, Nationals Park. I don't have one for Miami.

    Then there's the strange case of the Rangers, who came out of the Ameriquest fiasco going from the oddly specific yet unspecific "The Ballpark In Arlington" to the more contrived "Rangers Ballpark In Arlington," as if there were other ballparks in Arlington to challenge the Rangers' fallacious employment of the definite article. Couldn't have just gone all the way back, huh.

    I'd like them to name it after someone like they used to do sometimes...an owner, or whoever. But I guess that's a bad idea because it looks bad to take the honor away once naming rights are sold.

    I do like your "Capital Diamond" idea. Even if it's a placeholder, it does not have to sound like one for the interim. As for Nationals/Marlins Park, I am OK with the "s" on the end. We used to have "Royals Stadium" and I never had a problem with that. I think it's the "Park" part that bugs me. "Marlins Stadium" and "Nationals Stadium" sound better to me. I'd be all for those names if I really thought the intent was to keep 'em.

    They aren't stadiums, they're ballparks. An important distinction for teams who were previously in Football Stadiums. Maybe Marlins/Nationals Field would be acceptable, but Marlins/Nationals Stadium? No, thanks. The only way I could see renaming Marlins park might be for Carl Barger (Barger Park, Barger Field, etc.), since he brought baseball to Miami and they took away the previous honor of retiring the #5.

  7. I don't want to quote a huge pic but I really like that Patriots uniform. If you replaced the royal blue with navy and used the current font I think it would be a winner.

    I dislike the Navy. The Patriots should be RED, WHITE and BLUE, not burgundy, white and navy. I can see not liking the italics/drop shadow numbers.

    1004.gif

    This doesn't look bad.

  8. I think that these are the best jerseys in Blue Jays history:

    eegg2s6ui7g7ftxdy8nvm4vu6.gifpb30ih19ghavleeg7je25hq37.gifjdqu43o2y4jq79w8yee7bdkv6.gif

    I'd agree, if it wasn't for the 2012 set.

    Personally, I hate new jerseys that are just copies of old jerseys. It smacks of laziness... though I might feel differently if the Marlins went back to their 1993 look.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.