DrBear Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 I'd love to be 10 years older, so that I could better remember the end of Bart Starr's career - I think that would be an apt comparison of growing ineffectiveness (other than the injury part).I think Starr went down a lot quicker. Still solid in 1968 and 1969, but his shoulder was going out in 1970 and he was gone soon after.As for the schedule-strength tiebreaker, I've got a good New York Times chart reprinted at my Packerama blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.