ridenlow71

That is pretty cool Raven, what was that ring given out for?

Looks like someone designed their own ring for the Broncos.

I think Tiffany did a great job on the last Giants ring and Saints ring but yeah the last two rings for the Seahawks were disappointing.

Espn showing what 12 straight big 12 titles looks like for Kansas.

April 3rd the Kansas City Royals receive their World Series rings. Cant wait to see the design.

That's a cool picture. Kinda reminds me of when the packers had their rings sized in the locker before the game

Yeah it will be interesting if Jostens makes both the winner and losers rings this year. They made the Panthers only ring and they made the Broncos last AFC ring and Super Bowl ring. After see last years Pats rings it would be hard for a team to turn down Jostens, especially after Tiffany's terrible Seattle NFC Ring.

Absolutely ridiculous post I agree - the original reply was silly! The NFL team that wins is the World Champion. The NFL is not Arena football or College football. It is the best of the best. I thought they were super bowl champions.Why is it not called the world championship then ? Why do NBA rings say world champions even though basketball is played all over the world. Why is it called the World Series when all but one team are from the USA? Your logic doesn't work

Yeah I always thought the Packers ring was small overall, until I saw the picture that I posted up above and it's really not. Weight wise yes but overall look it's a decent size. I think that's what makes the packers rings classic is that there not huge and gaudy. Their big enough to get your attention but not so much that their screaming "look at me".

Saw this and thought it was cool. Not sure how they got their hands on all of these.

Yeah the top of the ring is awesome!! But agree the sides are terrible, but I've never been impressed with any of the diamond cutters ring. The 1997 Bronocs ring is the worst ring I've ever seen. That's why a lot of teams stick with the big companies like Jostens, Tiffanys, Balfour ect

Holy good god do they look HUGE!!! Kinda cool they put the players jersey numbers on the front. Not sure I really like the design overall though.

Do the Warriors receive their rings this week?

MSU 2015 Cotton bowl ring.

I have to agree. Your analysis is spot on.Mine would be the order they received them. The first one I like because it's big and gawdy. With all of them I think the feathers should have had colored stones.

That's pretty cool

Yeah it would have been nice if they at least put some colored stones in for the feathers. It's an ok design overall all, the first one in 2010 is still my favorite.

Bart Starr's super bowl one ring in the Packers HOF. His 1965 ring is also there. When he passes away his super bowl two ring will be there as well.

I've seen the Pats ring on Gronks hand and it's HUGE! The problem is that the larger these rings get the less the players will actually wear them pretty much defeating the purpose. When I met Charles Woodson a few years ago I asked why he wasn't wearing his ring. He told me that it was so heavy that his hand would get tired and it left calluses on his other fingers. Even in an interview John Elway says he doesn't wear his because they are uncomfortable and didn't allow him to put his hands in his pockets. So while the players my want huge rings in the end they'll tell you later in life they'd prefer smaller.

Any word yet on the new Chicago Blackhawks or Golden state Warriors rings?

I've always heard that Perry sold his orginal years ago but apparently not. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/13342007/william-refrigerator-perry-super-bowl-ring-being-sold-auction

That's Really Disappointing, To Be Honest I think It's ugly

The design is disappointing, they could have put more thought into it.