Jump to content

The Mojo Maniac

Members
  • Posts

    701
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Mojo Maniac

  1. (Sorry in advance for large photo sizes) I'm having a hard time deciding if the High Desert Mavericks (Single-A Rangers affiliate) need to rebrand, or if they should stick with what they've got and run with it proudly.

    Because at first glance, this...

    kseuh6ffmu4cii7uczgr.gif

    ...looks incredibly dated. But when you look at their ballpark atmosphere...

    12297863.jpg

    36221585.jpg

    ...the logo and identity package's desolate datedness actually fits in pretty well with the very remote setting in the Mojave Desert. The stadium is on the very outer reaches of Adelanto, CA, a "suburb" of the larger city of Victorville.

    Man. You're a long way from the Show here.

    A long way from anything. I'm not agoraphobic but those pictures make me want to be.

    The pictures are kind of misleading. There is a lot of urban stuff like a mile over. To defend the team a little bit, my wife and I went on a little vacation and hit up a few minor league games on the route. The people at the Mavericks game were so nice. Way better than any other minor league game I've been to. They had the biggest group of fans that were there for a random Tuesday night. Lots of them wearing jerseys and stuff. It was strange.

    The logos definitely fit the team/city/location. Thought they were kinda funny before, but they fit very well.

    It does look really nice though. I do enjoy remotely located minor league fields like that.

    I actually just passed through Adelanto last week while heading from Phoenix to Reno. The Park is pretty much right at the very southern start of highway 395. It's definitely remote, but it doesn't even compare to some of the little s**t:censored: towns you run across heading north along that route (Like Bridgeport or anything near Mono County). It's actually not that far from Los Angeles, and sits just above San Bernardino. Games there are a bit strange because the park feels like a 1980s public swimming pool complex, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. The starkness and age of the park actually gave it some real charm. Makes you feel like you're REALLY seeing guys pay their dues in the minors. I actually went to a game there with fellow board members Acme Packer and Cujo a few summers ago when both were living around that area (I don't wanna speak for them too much, but I know that both of them are VERY happy to not be stuck out there any longer).

    If you're ever around the Southern California deserts and are bored (OF COURSE you'll be bored), California League games are a ton of fun and are usually really cheap.

    There's a good chance I'll be working in fairly close proximity to the place this summer, and a buddy of mine is working for them this season so I'm going to try to make a road trip there, 100+ degree temperatures and all.

    Judging by the pics and reviews at least, there definitely is a charm to the desolate setting, and I'd like to check it out in person. Rumor has it they're trying to move the club (Ventura, Irvine and Palm Desert are the supposed frontrunners), so I want to see what it's really like there before it's no more.

  2. Not sure if it was mentioned before, but the San Antonio Missions did a redesign. They went from black and gold to red, white and blue. The hats feature Davy Crockett's cap and a jalapeƱo in the shape of a S. I don't like the new wordmarks either.

    sanantoniomissionsnewlogos_zps08a0a652.j

    Yes it's been mentioned, but I'll reiterate that I am not a fan of the change either. The old primary definitely could've used some sprucing up, but this one just follows the now well-established Brandiose blueprint: a couple of logos that look too similar to coexist, a cutesy character swinging a bat (or bat-like item) and italics...italics everywhere.

    Far from terrible, but they definitely went fishing on a changeup in the dirt here.

  3. It still looks good, but they ruined the neon sign vibe that the original updated logo had. I preferred the orange as well. Disappointing.

    Being that they're now the A's AAA affiliate can't say I'm worry to see the orange and black go. It didn't feel right having their top minor league team wearing their cross town on and off field nemesis' colors.

    Nemesis? They're not in the same league. I understand there's a rivalry, but it's far from Yankees-Red Sox or Cubs-White Sox, isn't it?

  4. Gotta agree with you Buc, it's strange indeed how so many teams go "mute" at home and more colorful on the road. Another example is how these days you'll often see teams with a two-tone cap on the road, with a plain solid color at home (i.e. Astros, Twins). Used to almost always be the other way around, if anything.

    Back to the Volcanoes for a moment, their set still works alright IMO, even though it's almost 20 years old. The uniform scripts are unique and have enough lasting power, and the caps, while "backwards," work just as well. I'd even go so far as to say the circa-2003 armpit panels even add a little something to the home whites:

    volcanoes480_bx5zwsth_z33lz3ez.jpg

    And I rarely say this, but that custom number font is sweet!

  5. Not a "change" per se, but something a little different: the Salem-Keizer Volcanoes (Short-season A affiliate of the Giants)...

    ...have this cap (charcoal gray/black) as their home cap:

    RJGJKSVWVZKDKNM.20120713230138.jpg

    ...with a jersey that's white with red script and trim.

    And they wear this cap...

    pMLB2-15819076dt.jpg

    ...with a road gray vest that has black sleeves and a red script. Any other MiLB/indy/collegiate teams that have their caps and jerseys almost "backwards" like this?

    While I can't address other teams, I can safely opine that the Volcanoes identity is a complete cluster-fluff. Has been from day one. Could anyone who wasn't here when the team moved to town tell you that the abstract volcano has a "K" shaped plume for Keizer and an "S" shaped lava flow for Salem? Yup...

    Does it need a Brandiose treatment? Hell no! But it could use a little freshening up, something to make it look a little less 1996-ish, IMO.

    I actually like the Volcano logo. Believe it or not, I picked up on the "S" early on, but never saw the "K" until you mentioned it...and even, now, I feel like it's barely there as a stretch.

    I've since found photo evidence that they do mix and match, even though the way I originally listed them is still the "standard." As is, it looks much better:

    5226a92a34577.image.jpg

    Blake_Miller_Catching_ra6n6nd0_jn2ldh3n_

    Side note: the charcoal cap works for a team called the Volcanoes, but its logo seems outdated IMO.

  6. Not a "change" per se, but something a little different: the Salem-Keizer Volcanoes (Short-season A affiliate of the Giants)...

    ...have this cap (charcoal gray/black) as their home cap:

    RJGJKSVWVZKDKNM.20120713230138.jpg

    ...with a jersey that's white with red script and trim.

    And they wear this cap...

    pMLB2-15819076dt.jpg

    ...with a road gray vest that has black sleeves and a red script. Any other MiLB/indy/collegiate teams that have their caps and jerseys almost "backwards" like this?

  7. There's an irony to it for me...it doesn't make sense, but then again it does. I've only ever seen a few around in my life, but it doesn't surprise me in the sense that it's truly one of the more iconic hats in MiLB. Lots of people draw blanks when they see many other minor league caps, but quite often when they see those eyes, they say "hey, the Storm!"

    And for some background: Lake Elsinore is a popular place for extreme sports--motocross, BMX, skydiving, etc. To me at least, that cap just screams "extreme sports," with the fierce look and black and red colorway. That's how I see it, at least. I'm willing to bet that more than a few kids at the bike track or skate park wear those caps, it just "fits."

  8. Thank God there's an actual home jersey.

    All things considered, I say this rebrand is decent overall. There are no longer too many teams in the high minors that share the MLB club's name, so there's that. And a very nice choice on that sleeve patch recognizing a local landmark in a smoothly flowing manner. Home and road both look clean, and the BP is actually kinda fun.

    It's not without its faults though. The all-blue alts would look much better with just a solid blue cap, instead of the out-of-place 70s-80s white panel. And five caps? When will they be wearing the gray front panel and the "D"?

  9. So the announcement on the homepage shows a pic with all the uniforms.

    Home(?): turn-of-the-century style blue jersey AND pants(!) with giant "OKC" across the front, and a blue with white front panel cap. Please tell me that's not the default home look.

    Road: gray with "Oklahoma" (strange to leave out "City") in Dodgers-style cursive, and gray cap with blue bill. Yuck to that being the default road cap.

    Alt/BP: blue jersey with number on one side of chest and "OKLA" logo on other side. Looks like a pullover, either that or a button-up with neck trim.

    Why oh why would you pair a white front panel cap with a turn-of-the-century type uniform? Do they even have a "traditional" home uniform in the lineup? So many questions...too many.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.