It's not bad and certainly tame compared to the new norm of the past several years. I like the name a lot actually. Interesting to see grey take on a larger role. Love the white stroke on the bird-head cap logo. My 2 issues:What is the F supposed to be? Logs that were pecked? Why the anthropomorphic bird? Feels a bit like the late 90's roided-up Bluejays logo or a small collegiate wood-bat league logo.
Never heard of this; an MILB team that hasn't released its identity is having to deal with fake merch sites. Lazy Trash Pandas gear being sold online.
https://whnt.com/2018/10/21/rocket-city-trash-pandas-counterfeit-merchandise-popping-up-online/
Love seeing these.
#3 would have definitely been the logo if the team came about in the 80's.
#7 looks full-on Reptar!
#10 looks like a clumsy dino trying to balance on a giant ball.
Looked up Traverse City to see what they are known for and what would make a good new team name, and saw cherries mentioned in the summary paragraph. If this was Brandiose, we all know it would be the Fightin' Cherries.
I have so many questions...that midcourt logo appears to be massive, wherever this is they think they are America's Finest City, and the...surfer silhouette on the court? It just looks like an ink blot.
I get the new UNLV logo was controversial, but I actually liked it. Fairly certain it was SDS, right? I feel bad they scrapped it so early, can't imagine how much time and money both sides put into that.
Curious if it is NOLA, then would they keep all the new Brandiose Babycake branding, or maintain the branding of whatever Southern League team moves there. Lookouts have such a great identity, I hope it doesn't get lost in all of this.