adsarebad

It does not, the team is called avalanche, those take place in mountains, who lives in a mountain area? a yeti, bigfoot. it's awesome, brilliant , clever, funny. and it looked great, good design. Colorado C flag makes as much sense as the Canada and Alberta flags on the Calgary Flames jersey. And looks just as bad.

Avs need the black, and bigfoot back on the shoulders. they look really bad now, like a baby pajamas. With a curling team logo on the shoulder. They nailed their look on the first try in 1996!

powder blue does not work for all teams, but i think it does for St. Louis, and i didn't think it would! Light blue and red does not sound nice together, but the red birds on the blue jersey does look nice. Perhaps that is because that is how you like to see birds, on a light blue sky background!?

lots of dislikes..... but why not, since the white jersey have them!? can anyone skilled make a photoshop to see how it would look?

Come on man!

Right, it is mindboggling. Whomever came up with this idea must have taken too many pucks to the head. Guess the "bunch of jerks" is a real thing after all

how bizarre that they then removed the blue piping for this season!?

They had a black jersey last year?? don't remember that at all! If true, why the big announcement this year " black jerseys are back"

why do that Mets black jersey have the blue piping? https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-moms-to-follow-on-social-media

of what?

. . Their 2006 championship look was good, no need to mess with it. Same for the 04 Lightning. If it ain't broke........

And Carolina use their 2 alternates!? Blacks at home, and the horrible "Canes" on the road. But why?? Just get eliminated already

So hopefully only 3 more games!

Please tell me why the oilers are wearing those monstrosities for the second game in a row, in the playoffs??!

What if the Mets black jersey had blue pinstripes!?

The blue piping is what makes that jersey look like a baseball jersey, without it , it looks like a t-shirt! strange thing is, the white sox also have a black jersey, but that one i think looks great, and there is no piping on that....... how can that be? anyone else feel the same?

They removed black (for no reason) So they are not BFBS No, they RBFNR

ugh, why do LA still have those horrible jerseys, that piping that goes down the sleeves, right down through the stripes on the arms, just awful, and the logo? vomit! Edmonton got rid of theirs, why can't the kings do the same, is it because of the cups won in them? that is no excuse! Just go back to the Gretzky era unis, those they wear now just looks like a cheap knock off of those 90's jerseys!

Cardinals have not used their light blue jerseys this season? have they retired them?

Look at this, a T-shirt with 4 random placed patches, then ad the ad patch next season! Up down left right! I am sorry, that is not a very pleasing look. The opposite of symmetrical! The patches are all over the place

okay, true, but the color scheme is though. They should have added gold.

okay, but isn't it a bit (very) stupid to exactly copy the Cubs CC unis? right down to the light blue long sleeves underneath! even the pose is the same!

Where do the navy come from? Light blue and navy, then i like the cubs CC jersey and hat better. it has script and sleeve logo, not two different logos as this royals jersey.

with ads coming they will be limited in their creations. not only do ads look horrible, it also interferes with new designs and creative thinking. "oh right, we cant do that, that is where the ads patch goes"

Dodgers have a patch on the back of the hats(!) 21 it says, is that a memorial patch? they no longer have them on the jersey sleeve? is that because the sleeve already are reserved for an ad!?