Audiodrama Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 Got to sit in my dad's company's suite... Full album here: http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v239/unw...1125PatsEagles/But here are a few selected shots...Inside the suite...Our view of the field...Great shot of the scoreboard on the east side of the stadium...I'm shocked they even let Matt Cassel sit with them...Me looking like a goober. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 Hey, if you're in a suite, you're not a goober. Got to watch from a suite once at a Saints game...it was a lot of fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DGivens87 Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 Those are some great seats, huh? You get a better vantage point there than we writers do in the pressbox. A large cheese pizza, just for me.New England's source for soccer newsAnd hey, I made it to ESPN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audiodrama Posted November 26, 2007 Author Share Posted November 26, 2007 Givens you're from East Prov? Where'd you go to H.S.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 Those are some great seats, huh? You get a better vantage point there than we writers do in the pressbox. You writers in the pressbox aren't paying for your seat. One thing I noticed with Gillette: the comparative paucity of seating per suite. It appears as if you could fit 25-30 people in a suite with little or no trouble, but instead have maybe 10 chairs facing the field with the more comfortable seating focused around either food or a (presumed) in-suite television.The ESA in Raleigh is similarly laid out, but with actual stadium-type seats in front of the 'bar.' Is that the case at Gillette as well and I'm just not seeing it? It'd seem to be an awful waste to have such a big suite and only have maybe 10 people able to watch the game live without standing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audiodrama Posted November 27, 2007 Author Share Posted November 27, 2007 Those are some great seats, huh? You get a better vantage point there than we writers do in the pressbox. You writers in the pressbox aren't paying for your seat. One thing I noticed with Gillette: the comparative paucity of seating per suite. It appears as if you could fit 25-30 people in a suite with little or no trouble, but instead have maybe 10 chairs facing the field with the more comfortable seating focused around either food or a (presumed) in-suite television.The ESA in Raleigh is similarly laid out, but with actual stadium-type seats in front of the 'bar.' Is that the case at Gillette as well and I'm just not seeing it? It'd seem to be an awful waste to have such a big suite and only have maybe 10 people able to watch the game live without standing.There are indeed stadium seats in front of the bar, closer to the window. There were two rows of about fourteen each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 Those are some great seats, huh? You get a better vantage point there than we writers do in the pressbox. You writers in the pressbox aren't paying for your seat. One thing I noticed with Gillette: the comparative paucity of seating per suite. It appears as if you could fit 25-30 people in a suite with little or no trouble, but instead have maybe 10 chairs facing the field with the more comfortable seating focused around either food or a (presumed) in-suite television.The ESA in Raleigh is similarly laid out, but with actual stadium-type seats in front of the 'bar.' Is that the case at Gillette as well and I'm just not seeing it? It'd seem to be an awful waste to have such a big suite and only have maybe 10 people able to watch the game live without standing.There are indeed stadium seats in front of the bar, closer to the window. There were two rows of about fourteen each.Ah! Okay. That would make far more sense then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.