Jump to content

chickenfish13

Members
  • Posts

    3,044
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by chickenfish13

  1. Yeah that's a pretty incredible touch. Quberten's work is gorgeous, love coming across studios I haven't seen before.
  2. This is really strong, nicely done! Simple, iconic, great use of color, no unneccesary bells and whistles. Would love to see more identities like this make their way into the big 4.
  3. I hope this split N thing isn't becoming a trend. That being said it's a nice mark, very balanced. Looks great in that embroidered visual on the website.
  4. That Riptide mark would be a nice modernized look for the Carolina Hurricanes
  5. It's well designed and I want to like it but there's something real weird going on with the dragon's mouth. Also would like the wordmark better without the horn on the D.
  6. Yeah I'd be interested in seeing this as well. Say what you want about Brandiose's gimmick but at least their stuff is well designed.
  7. Pretty gimmicky and that primary is all sorts of illustration but that F-Cow is genius.
  8. I've always been a bit easier on Brandiose as they're very technically skilled and most of their work is enjoyable, but this one is a bit much for my taste.
  9. I'd say the top right is certainly the strongest one. Having the animal in white on a red background doesn't work due to the contrast/colour balance, so I'd stick to the red on white. I think the red outlines of the stag could be just a bit thicker as well. I'd stick to the shield as opposed to the roundel, as the overall shape of the stag head leaves a lot of negative space when placed in the circle. The shield offers a nicer balance. I'm also not sure you gain anything by having the shield be dual-toned, and I'd try keeping the top of the shield flat instead of arched. Hopefully some of that is a bit helpful, nice work.
  10. Quick Blue Jay mark I whipped up watching the Opening Day game today! Inspired by Toronto but not really designed with them in mind, more so just a generic jay mark. Trying to get back into coming up with more sport's content, so any feedback would be rad. Cheers!
  11. I think the first iteration is stronger. Your second mark is a bit too detailed, especially the black shape. Having the 4 points, like the first, helps keep everything balanced.
  12. Have to echo everyone on the SC. I get being really attached to a unique idea you come up with, and I tend to agree that not every detail needs to be immediately recognized, but it's such a focal point of the logo and really draws the eye to it. Only other thing I'd mention is maybe bump up the bridge slightly so the Nashville type doesn't have to be so elongated. Beyond those two points, it's really a beautiful mark, both in concept and in execution. Very jealous you were taught by Joe, that must have been an awesome day.
  13. The primary is very strong, well done. I think the S you've chosen integrates well with the whitetail's head, but it seems to be throwing the secondary off balance a bit. Did you play around with shrinking the size of the S and using it as a centerpiece to the circle?
  14. That is a good point yeah it may cause some readability issues. Sure thing.
  15. I'm usually partial to thicker lines, but the circle seems a bit too thick to me. Honestly I'd have to see both and compare side by side to really tell. Here's a very hasty and bad example of what I had in mind with rounding the corners. This is, again, mostly just a preference thing.
  16. I think either way it's clear enough that you've got an A and a mountain. They're complimentary enough that neither option is clearly better than the other in terms of readability, at least in my opinion. I would go with 2 because the shape fills in the circle a bit more symmetrically. I'd change the stroke widths of the circle and the A so that they match. Probably better off going with the slightly thinner weight of the A. I also quite like the rounded corners of the snow, and would be interested to see how it would look if you rounded the other corners as well. Hopefully that helps a little bit!
  17. I'm not a massive fan but I applaud them for trying something original and not just using a B version of the main clubs logo.
  18. Sounds good, I'll revert back to the previous version for the jerseys, which I'm working on right now. Can't get them to where I want them. In the meantime, I've got the next team's logo ready to go. Here's the Kings. It's an edit of an old Lion logo. I'm not sure how the containing shape will be received, obviously it isn't the typical Lion's hair outline. I thought it might be interesting to combine the Lion with a shield, and I'm happy enough with it to stick to it, unless there is any major backlash. Would love to hear thoughts!
  19. Are any updates here a significant improvement over the last version? I've been fiddling with it a lot, but I think maybe I got a bit too cute with making the curves line up. If nothing stands out as being better, or if anything stands out as being worse, I think I'll just go back to the last version for the jerseys.
  20. Interesting. My biggest worry before posting it was that it had too much of a beaver/muskrat vibe. So when someone mentioned it I figured that's how most would see it. I'm glad that isn't everyone's first thought though, and that it's being well received. Thanks all for commenting!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.