DCarp1231

Holding my breath for the pants and socks reveal

I still think Tennessee could revert to the Oilers uniforms but keep the Titans name.

A month or so ago, there was a competition ran to design the Overstock scheme for SHR. We’ve now gone through 2 race with SHR running the intended scheme. Fans are starting to get upset at not seeing their work make it onto the cars

I still think about this.

6 minutes ago, CaliforniaGlowin said:

If only this were true for red and blue teams

All it takes is for one of those teams to commit to being a red-first team and set themselves apart.

I don’t get the whole “x team can’t do this because y team does it and they might look too much like z team”.

Especially when we have three teams in one division being blue heavy and two of those teams are having a dick measuring competition to see who deserves to own the rights to use a different shade of blue.

It’s all fun and games until someone says the Falcons should swap white for cream/tan

Reviving college football teams from this thread

There’s a happy medium somewhere in these

1 minute ago, HOOVER said:

And it sounds like it’s the league that would make them wait that long, which is a shame.  There should be an expedited process for new ownership situations.

I think you may have quoted the wrong reply

3 hours ago, VikWings said:

 

Can add Detroit to the backtracked list as well.

 

FWIW though the Falcons, Chargers, Rams, Patriots, Cardinals and Commies are all too soon to backtrack. 2024 will be year 5 for ATL, NE, and the LA teams, year 3 for Wash and year 2 for ARZ.

 

(Titans have also kept theirs)

Even if Washington wanted to change considering new ownership wipes out the 5 year requirement, it still takes (allegedly) 18-24 months to complete the process. We’d be looking at changing after year 4 if we’re fortunate enough to even think Josh Harris & Co. made it a top priority in year 1.

2 hours ago, HOOVER said:

And just to add on to this silly concept, all Atlanta would have to do for their NikeSpeak presentation is to show these photos:

I can hear the narrator in the unveiling video now…
 

*pictures and clips of Deion* “The gold standard, woven deep into the fabric of ATL culture… worn with pride.” *flashes gold accents on the uniform* *player model shows off grills and it’s Kirk Cousins*

I like the idea of adding gold into the Falcons set, but I also like the idea of silver/grey pants. Is there room for both?

8 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said:

Why should you hate it?

The black being used so prominently. It oddly looks good here and reminds me a little bit of Iowa State mixed with Minnesota.

(It’s well done, apologies for not saying that at first)

2 hours ago, oldschoolvikings said:

I should hate this, but I don’t?

Never forget where we came from

Utah Angels of Salt Lake City

They’ll never be you 

2 minutes ago, monkeypower said:

Not to make this thread even hotter with nothing new, what's everyone's thoughts on this logo that came with the new Jets set of logos?

 

 

I want to like it and I think it's clever but it might just be too minimalist?

No, it’s perfect and makes sense as a secondary logo. In fact, the jet by itself would be a good logo to put on the helmet.

The gold-to-black gradient helmet made no sense for Jacksonville. If they insisted on the effect, why not teal-to-black to mimick the Jaguar coming out of tall grass? And why so much gradient anyway?

10 minutes ago, MCM0313 said:

Bring back 1997-2002 set but with current helmet and logo. Make pant stripes narrower. Add red alt jersey in the same style. Bartkowski-era red-helmet, red-jersey throwback. Only ever wear silver-grey pants with all combos. Done. 

It’s foolish to ever think a team will only ever wear one set of pants. Raiders are the only holdout.

So, Atlanta is definitely getting a redesign after this season, right? RIGHT?

It wouldn’t surprise me if the blue pants have a solid white stripe

The only acceptable way to put a WCF patch on the new set is above the player nameplate.

Also, give us blue facemasks.