damnyoutuesday

The 2017-19 Rams is the worst look in the NFL this century. And it makes zero sense considering the looks they had previously and immediately after that horrendous set

2 hours ago, walkerws said:

Is this Adidas' 1st CFP team?

It is

• Nike/Jordan
  • Alabama
  • Oregon
  • Florida State
  • Ohio State
  • Clemson
  • Michigan State
  • Oklahoma
  • Washington
  • Georgia
  • LSU
  • Michigan
  • TCU
• Under Armour
  • Notre Dame
  • Cincinnati
• Adidas
  • Washington

Washington will be both the first Adidas team, and first team to make the CFP under different suppliers

1 hour ago, timjameskohler said:

I think so. The same way that Miami is WAH almost always. 

Speaking of which, it's almost December and Miami has not worn either of their aqua jerseys yet (they wore their standard aqua jersey for their preseason game vs Atlanta, but not in the regular season)

48 minutes ago, tBBP said:

 

Ok, I need somebody to explain to me what going on here.

 

I can't figure out what's worse: the fact that UK has chrome helmets at all, or the style of #90s helmet. Thing looks like a chromed out Green Ranger helmet...

It's a kind of helmet made for lineman constantly bonking heads with each other. George Kittle and the Bosa brothers wear them in the NFL

7 minutes ago, Phillyspecial2018 said:

This is just a hunch but Tennessee hasn't worn Columbia Blue yet. so maybe this is the week? 

The Titans dropped the Columbia blue jersey for the Oilers throwbacks

I am 100% behind letting color on color matchups happen more. As long as the colors clash, let teams wear what they want

3 hours ago, kaleb_girod said:

I don’t mind the power blue helmet, but I feel like Ole Miss wears the powder blue just a bit too much. It should really be more of a once/maybe twice per season thing. I also only like it with the powder blue jerseys otherwise it’s mismatched with the navy/red.

 

But I agree they should keep it traditional more.

I don't like it when they wear the powder blue helmet and jersey, because it looks odd with the red on the helmet but  no red on the jersey. The powder blue helmet works better with the red jersey because there's balance

2 hours ago, kaleb_girod said:

Ole Miss looked great last night in the Egg Bowl. I’ve always loved the Rebels traditional uniform and I hate that they’ve opted for so many alternate combos throughout the season. It really dilutes their identity imo.

 

The navy helmets and gray pants are just classic Ole Miss and the superior look.

Ole Miss has been getting it right with the powder blue helmet, but they need to keep the jersey to their traditional red at home and the pants to always be the grey

According to GUD, 14 teams are wearing an alternate/throwback this week

Add a single blue stripe on the pants and helmet, and add the current Lions logo to the helmet, and these should be the primaries... Basically be the Raiders but blue

1 hour ago, dont care said:

They would have had to wear them in the offseason, and throughout practice this week to break them in. If they haven’t been seen yet they aren’t wearing them.

The whiteout is on Christmas Eve

4 hours ago, MJWalker45 said:

You wouldn't be able to see EMU half the time if they are showing the All 22 view.  

This was last year's game. At least Buffalo had black pants and helmets or they'd disappear:

 

I always think my TV is broken when EMU is at home

12 minutes ago, the admiral said:

The Seahawks, the most "how to epically own your racist uncle back home with facts and logic" team getting a Thanksgiving game just shows that the nation is healing and the vibe is shifting. The all-green is still a bit much, though.

Sir this is a Wendy's

Eastern Michigan is wearing grey uniforms vs Buffalo in black. Looks horrible

Hello mods.

Odd request, but could we potentially tell Canzman to make his uniform prediction graphics smaller? There's no reason they can't be shrunk to fit into one post, instead of scrolling past two full length posts where half the pants just say "TBD". It wouldn't be bad if it was just one post, but two giant posts every week for something that doesn't necessarily contribute anything if they're gonna say "TBD" and then be edited when they're 6 pages back. Other posters have also shared a similar sentiment.

Thanks.

I am once again asking @canzman to make his graphics smaller

I am once again asking @canzman to make his graphics smaller

3 minutes ago, kaleb_girod said:

Interesting.

 

Makes you wonder why other teams don’t use Nike pants if the Raiders and Cowboys don’t.

I would imagine it's probably easier for teams to order from Nike directly than the way the Raiders and Cowboys do it. And most teams don't care about the slight difference in materials the way we sickos do

10 minutes ago, ruttep said:

 

I can when for two full seasons the ONLY uniforms they wore were all navy and white jersey with navy leggings (Even now, the only games over the last couple of seasons that didn't feature an overload of navy were three silver pants games and three throwback games). Other teams that occasionally wear all navy (Seahawks, Texans, Bears) have other pant and sock combos that they can mix in (and do). I'm still not convinced that the Patriots are going to do the right thing and make their silver pants their primary, especially since Robert Kraft is apparently fond of all navy.

BFBS exists when you have a black uniform in a color scheme without black. It is not NFNS if their primary color is navy, it's just overusing navy. If the Vikings added a navy jersey, that would be NFNS

1 hour ago, buckeye said:

See Ohio State gets it right. Wears their iconic home/road uniforms for basically every game, busts out an alternate for one game a season that still looks like Ohio State, and then wears beloved throwbacks for the postseason

1 minute ago, BBTV said:

That doesn’t mean they’re removed from the style guide and are *technically* an option, and that they’ve removed it from the rotation on their own.  While it might turn out to be accurate, I’m not sure a mothership article can always be taken as gospel. Even in this case, the wording is a little vague.  “Replacing in the rotation” doesn’t mean “mothballed” or “not available”. 

Uni-Watch described them as "mothballed"

https://uni-watch.com/2023/07/24/tennessee-titans-unveil-houston-oilers-throwback-uniform/

3 minutes ago, canzman said:

They added the Oiler throwback but didn't remove the Columbia Blue from the closet

That is false

https://news.sportslogos.net/2023/07/23/tennessee-titans-unveil-houston-oilers-throwback-uniforms/football/

From the mothership: "Interestingly, the Oilers throwback uniforms will now replace the Titans’ light blue alternate jerseys in the rotation, joining the navy blue home and white road jerseys, rather than add a fourth uniform option."

17 minutes ago, kimball said:

Here is Indiana's court with a game in progress. Ummm ... it's definitely different. Kinda seems feels like a FIBA tourney game or something? 

 

 

 

I was actually kind of interested to see how these turned out IRL, but good god this is bad

3 minutes ago, MCM0313 said:

Chiefs or Raiders hopefully. 

Unless the Seahawks fall off a cliff the rest of the season, it will probably be Chargers or Chiefs

Double outlines are definitely a case-by-case uniform element. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't