Jump to content

kolob

Members
  • Posts

    2,719
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by kolob

  1. 13 hours ago, Sykotyk said:

    One, Las Vegas Ballpark is a top of the line, beautiful AAA level park. It's honestly to MLB standards in quality it's just small and lacks the numbers of things people want in an MLB stadium. Fewer seats, fewer boxes/clubs/etc. But quality wise it works.

     

    Got to see a game there back in 2019.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    It's not unreal. Arizona Coyotes are playing in a 4500 seat venue. Chargers played a year at whatever they called the StubHub Center that year.

     

    The other thing is that the Aviators are the A's affiliate. They could 'swap'... Put the A's in Las Vegas Ballpark and send their AAA team to Oakland until they vacate the LV Ballpark for this new venue. You could even still call them the Oakland A's. Then bring them back or leave them depending how well they do. LV Ballpark could be a A or AA venue (quite large) but to avoid going up against the MLB team now in town.

     

    But staying in Oakland will not work. Attendance cratered already with the chance they'd find a new home in Oakland. This isn't the regionalized Raiders fan base that tolerated it somewhat. Plus NFL has ridiculously high standards for their home venues now. They were not playing at Sam Boyd or anywhere else.

     

     

     

    The only thing I could see being an issue would be duel use of Las Vegas Ballpark by the A's and Aviators and it's not like they can do doubleheaders with day games because of the heat. I wonder if the Aviators move back to Cashman Field for a couple years or move to Fresno, Tucson or similar underserved market temporarily until the A's move out?

     

    Additionally, the LV Ballpark has a 10,000 capacity. I feel like you'd need add at least 5,000-10,000 for temporary use, but I'm not sure if that's possible with the park's footprint? 

     

    48286612167_10defa75f3_k.jpg

     

    But, maybe all that speculation is a moot point with this quote ...

     

    Quote

    “We have an agreement with the Aviators with Don [Logan] and Howard Hughes [Corporation] to play at their stadium temporarily,” he said. “We’re really deferring to Major League Baseball to kind of help us make that decision.” (source)

     

    10,000 seats might be enough? I mean it definitely is for the team at the moment.

     

  2. On 4/15/2023 at 6:20 AM, Walk-Off said:

     

    While I am not personally aware of anything that the Latter-day Saints Church has done to help "build" Las Vegas as we know that place today, I did live for a while in a region where, at the time, the LDS Church-owned Bonneville International Corporation owned and operated two commercial FM radio stations -- one specializing in classic secular rock music and the other devoted to alternative secular rock.  Thus, my impression is that the LDS Church has been most willing to own and/or run businesses that at least seem to contradict well-known church doctrines if and when the church can keep an extremely low profile about such enterprises.

     

    Yes, the LDS Church's highest-ranking leaders have apparently spent decades tolerating Sunday home games played by the current Salt Lake Bees club, previous professional baseball teams in Salt Lake City, and pro baseball teams elsewhere in Utah (e.g. the Pioneer League's Ogden Raptors) and in heavily Mormon communities outside Utah (e.g. the Pioneer League's Idaho Falls Chukars).  Even so, I would not put it past the LDS organization's grand poobahs to be brazen enough to exploit Major League Baseball's far higher profile and level of wealth by trying to hold an MLB franchise in the church's mother city to an unreasonably much higher standard regarding compliance with LDS doctrines on matters such as the home game schedule.  Should that happen, I hope rather strongly that the team's ownership and/or the MLB commissioner's office will use the LDS Church's history of "sinful" business ventures to push back hard against any such demand.

     

    As a member of the prominent religion here in Utah the "concern" of Sunday home games isn't so much a matter of LDS leadership demands, in fact I'd say there hasn't been much of a demand from leadership since (if ever) the early 20th century. However, over the past 20-25 years it's more so a matter of population demand. While a good segment of LDS fans probably wouldn't attend a Sunday home game, SLC and the surrounding areas have enough of a population where it's a moot point.

     

     

    • Like 1
  3. On 4/15/2023 at 10:57 AM, Discogod said:

    Must have been a temporary thing - the Jazz had standard NoBs but it looks like Joe C's surname was too long.

     

    It fits ok in this picture, although the number is a little low as a result:

    spacer.png

    Yeah, I saw that one too. I'd love to know the exact dates of the two pictures because they're two different numbers, but in Landover against the Bullets. I wonder if it was the same game? It'd be fun to dig a little.

    • Like 1
  4. 20 hours ago, fortunat1 said:

    Sounds like they're also shelving the city jersey for the playoffs as well

     

    City Jerseys (and most throwbacks) should be shelved for the playoffs. I don't mind Statement jerseys, but stick to the basics as much as possible.

     

    I hate that this moment is attached to nothing that says the team name. 

     

    MAC54_COVER01-810x608-1560491477.jpg

    • Like 5
    • Love 1
    • Applause 1
    • Dislike 1
  5. 1 hour ago, JTernup said:

    The Suns' uniforms have become such a forgettable mess. None of their sets since moving on from the Nash era uniforms have been particularly good. They've muddled their primary color scheme with grey and black, they can's seem to stick with a style (sun burst, upside down/backwords word mark, bevels, gradients etc.). It's actually shocking that they've only had two overhauls in the last 10 years. I literally forget what their uniforms look like every time I see them because they are so forgettable and bland. At least when other teams destroy their visual identities there is a look that feels "right", I don't know what the Suns should be wearing at this point.

     

    Let's be honest, the Nash-era jerseys weren't that good either.

    • Like 8
  6. On 4/7/2023 at 9:54 PM, FinsUp1214 said:


    I’m guessing/assuming what the Jazz unveiled for 2023-24 during this past summer would fall into both the updated statement and new classic edition categories (new purple mountain alt and the Pistol Pete throwbacks)? 

     

    Yeah, they were already announced last summer by the Jazz. Since it's the Jazz's 50th anniversary they're wearing their 1974 road jersey as a throwback and I think the purple mountain is their city jersey since there is no Jordan logo.

    FVeOizEUUAA92Ln.jpg

     

    • Like 4
  7. 5 hours ago, Foxxtrot44 said:

    I like how this image has been posted twice now (on a forum for logos, no less) by people so obviously tickled by the "SL,UT" moniker that they completely failed to notice Jerry West capping the Salt Lake temple.

     

    I actually really kind of love that. I'd love that on a t-shirt. (the Jerry West logo, the SL,UT moniker is way overplayed).

  8. IMO this is how Color vs. Color should work and should be the norm. Keep the white jerseys at home games only. And, stop with the City vs. Throwback matchups. I wish the NBA took a MLB approach to throwback jerseys and games by dressing both teams up in era appropriate jerseys.

    • Like 6
  9. On 12/1/2022 at 8:00 AM, eastfirst107 said:

    Veterans' Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix was another smaller, older venue used through the early 90s.

     

    The American flag tacked onto the wall horizontally above the scoreboard, rather than hanging vertically from a beam as is customary today, is interesting.

     

    Portland Trail Blazers v Phoenix Suns

     

    Well and one thing that goes unnoticed is that the tiles are curved! Which makes sense because of the exterior design. It's just hard to notice it in pictures.

     

    img569-M.jpg Arizona-Veterans-Memorial-Coliseum-1024x

    • Like 3
    • Love 1
  10. 1 hour ago, eastfirst107 said:

    Like a lot of NBA arenas that lasted well into the 1990s, the Salt Palace was such a charmingly...modest-looking place.

    utah-jazz-vs-milwaukee-bucks.webp?s=1024x1024&w=gi&k=20&c=WO2hMet4sZA9Ux8RaLlv1HrljvOPevCYmuJBPb9KDP0=

     

    Los Angeles Lakers v Utah Jazz

     

    I agree. I was way too young to remember my first Jazz game at the Salt Palace. But, before they tore it down I was able to attend a couple of Golden Eagles games, a few circuses, Disney on Ice shows and a few NBA All-Star Weekend events back in 1993. It definitely showed it's age, but there really was a charm to it that you don't see in any of the modern arenas.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.