habsfannova Posted June 18, 2004 Share Posted June 18, 2004 I'd say no. I think the money can be used elsewhere. I'm glad it's not common here (Except for that Argos deal...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 18, 2004 Share Posted June 18, 2004 If the people pay to have it built, the people should own it, and the people should receive the benefits of the proceeds from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintsfan Posted June 18, 2004 Share Posted June 18, 2004 I voted no, but I really am not sure to be honest- I mean if government doesn't pay at least a share then who will, these thinks aren't cheap!! 2011/12 WFL Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winters in buffalo Posted June 19, 2004 Share Posted June 19, 2004 I don't have a problem with the government putting up some of the money, but there should be a number of stipulations:- the government gets a portion of the revenue in return, which should be used to pay for the extra police coverage, traffic control, infrastructure upgrades, etc. that come with a stadium- it has to be part of a larger economic development area. a stadium or arena in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by parking lots and cornfields, is a waste. there should have to be several nearby hotels, restaurants, etc within walking distance, that will benefit from the added traffic it brings.- there has to be a certain number of events there annually- no sense building something that gets used part of the year and sits empty the rest. In the off-season, there should be a minimum number of concerts, trade shows, minor league sports and other events to generate revenue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.