Jump to content

Lights Out

Members
  • Posts

    15,366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Posts posted by Lights Out

  1. 20 hours ago, anythinglogos said:

    The knicks used white outlines inside the numbers in the 2010 media day, due to the Rev30 switch. In the end they kept the normal blue outline with an additional outline that was the same  color of the jerseydanilo-gallinari-of-the-new-york-knicks-

    It's possible that the equipment manager just used the numbers that were supposed to go on the road blue jerseys by accident for this photoshoot.

    • Like 3
  2. 4 hours ago, Typhoon said:

    Not sure if it's the number font or the placement of the bolts on the shoulders but I prefer this look for the Chargers 

     

    IMG_4811.JPG

    IMG_4812.JPG

    That's the popular opinion on this board. Personally, though, I've always hated that look. It's just boring. The Chargers should never wear navy or any shade of blue other than powder. The only reason why they ever wore navy to begin with is because it's the Spanos family's favorite color - which should be reason enough to consign it to the dustbin of history.

     

    Now, had the Chargers gone with something like the powder-blue mockup shown on the right in this picture, that era would have been a little more tolerable even in spite of navy:

     

    xhSj6kv.jpg

     

    The road look would have still been bland without any powder blue, but it still would have been an improvement overall.

  3. On 12/21/2016 at 2:21 AM, Dolphins Dynasty said:

    It's not exactly on par with most of the logos in the MLS, but I still think this is a pretty solid logo.

     

    qtfoxrlfgs3gjvif4ao608tia.gif

    In a league full of boring wannabe-European roundels, crests and names, the Revs' identity looks a lot better by comparison than it otherwise would.

    • Like 1
  4. I still think that's the Vikings' best look - when it was worn properly, of course. The monochrome combos they couldn't stop wearing messed up the pants design, which was supposed to flow into the jersey striping. But when worn purple-over-white and white-over-purple, it was sheer perfection. I really liked the horn-insipired contours of the shoulder stripes.

     

    GPWYeNo.jpg

    • Like 2
  5. Another Sixers prototype, presumably from the mid-late 2000s:

     

    NxWnd9V.jpg

     

    xeKe53e.jpg

     

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Adidas-NBA-sample-authentic-Philadelphia-76er-jersey-blank-pro-cut-Size-XL-/232159239398?hash=item360dc4dce6

     

    This is not the same as the Sixers prototype I posted in September 2014 - the piping/panels are slightly different and the collar design is what the Hawks ended up using when they changed their uniforms in 2007.

  6. On 11/16/2016 at 4:20 PM, Dolphins Dynasty said:

    Image result for 1981 cincinnati bengals

     

    These uniforms suck. The jerseys are too generic and the striping looks like orange duct tape with tiger stripes. It's an overall outdated set that should stay in the past.

    This set was greatly improved when the stripes were tweaked in the '90s.

     

    T6zVvcH.jpg

     

    It even looked nice in monochrome!

     

    2fliwV9.jpg

    • Like 9
  7. On 8/23/2016 at 0:41 PM, insert name said:

    Can we agree that of all the teams that added black, the Royals were the worst? 

    royals-2003-590x450.jpg

    royals-2002-590x323.jpg

    No, because that home vest uniform is still the best look they've ever worn. (It would have looked even nicer with gold drop shadows instead of black, though.)

     

    The worst uses of black are still the 2000s A's and the 2003-2011 Marlins (I know black was one of their colors, but they still sucked at using it).

     

    IJMlPIn.jpg

     

    QMqaDyl.jpg

     

    KxSXYY4.jpg

     

    HGs0YsH.jpg

     

    thFUERX.jpg

     

    A dishonorable mention goes to the early-2000s Rangers, who often wore an alternate version of their regular cap with a black brim for no reason other than to sell merchandise. They didn't even bother to make the squatchee match the brim.

     

    hp1dO7r.jpg

  8. On 6/19/2016 at 7:25 AM, miltonANDlumbergh said:

    This is better than their current set which I've grown tired of:

    roy_zpscxmyb997.png

    I still think the Graphite Jays era was the closest they ever came to a perfect look. The shade of blue they used back then looked stunning in person. They just never quite figured out how to use that color scheme effectively. If they unveiled something like this back in 2004, they might still be wearing them now:

     

    spWNmy7.png

     

    stUShIp.png

    • Like 2
  9. A couple more unused finds:

     

    Apparently, when Adidas was designing the Sacramento Kings' previous uniform set, they were originally going to put the wordmarks in their proper places: the city name on the road and (presumably) the team name at home. This prompts the question of how they managed to screw it up on the final product.

     

    ZkVun0G.jpg

     

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-AUTHENTIC-2008-SACRAMENTO-KINGS-NBA-ADIDAS-SAMPLE-JERSEY-48-0-SEWN-NWT-/291746084639?hash=item43ed6bf71f%3Ag%3AIEsAAOSwa-dWpykz&nma=true&si=OS9Q%252FJRktLie%252FzipTLqzf7tef%252BU%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

     

    Here's a prototype of the Bucks' prior uniform set. Not much different than the ones they actually wore, but the collar here is tri-color instead of two-tone.

     

    v34VFXl.jpg

     

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/VERY-UNUSUAL-SALESMAN-SAMPLE-MILWAUKEE-BUCKS-NBA-BASKETBALL-JERSEY-50-SEWN-ON-/182040744390?hash=item2a627951c6%3Ag%3AP84AAOSwKtVW1g8D&nma=true&si=OS9Q%252FJRktLie%252FzipTLqzf7tef%252BU%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.