Jump to content

ridenlow71

Members
  • Posts

    516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ridenlow71

  1. Those NBA Championship rings are terrible. After 1983, they lose not only the consistency, but also some of the designs just don't make any sense when including the franchise's history. The only team that seemed to stay grounded was the Spurs, but theirs isn't great either.

    See I disagree, I think all the ones before 83 were boring. It is nice to see that the teams started designing their own. But thats just me.

  2. Pretty much what I expected... clever use of the Lombardis in the corners, but I would've preferred to see the 9 pre-Super Bowl championships represented somehow. Hopefully someone tweets pics of the sides soon.

    There is 13 diamonds in the "G" that repersent all the championships

    http://www.packers.com/news-and-events/article_spofford/article-1/Ring-tells-story-of-10-and-time/15b2ff17-30a6-4b9c-a708-e561891ba9ec

  3. Almost forgot, is this the ring we're talking about? What year is it from?

    osu_rings_20110516114539_640_480.jpg

    No I had the 2009 Big ten/rose bowl ring. Thats the new big ten ring. I never owned it. Picture below.

    Also why would someone make a knock-off 2001 Iowa independce bowl ring? Really come on. Here are the manufactors markings for each ring. You dont want to believe so be it. I know what I have B)

    DSCN0269.jpg

    006.jpg

    DSCN0290.jpg

    DSCN0293.jpg

  4. Yes what you see is a replica in that link..but no the quality is :censored:! Alot of times they will use a picture of a real ring so it looks like a million dollars. Then you get it and it looks like :censored:. Mine are all real, i don't buy fakes or replicas.

    If your looking for an Ohio ring, I can tell you where my old one is. I believe he still has it. All depends what you are willing to spend.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.