Jump to content

mcrosby

Members
  • Posts

    2,704
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

Posts posted by mcrosby

  1. I've heard rumors from those within league offices that Bismarck will be the Larks, making them the third bird nickname in the league. 

     

    As far as Fond du Lac goes: I'm a fan of Lake Flies and that's about it. Shantymen is the only other name that feels localized to Fond du Lac, and it's just not that good of a name. 

     

    Something like this with a bit more minor league pizzazz would work great for an alternative to the classic wordmark tail. 

    mayfly-logo300.jpg

  2. Most Definitely mcrosby! Glad you decided to add your vintage logo updates on here, which are great by the way. Good stuff from you as always.

    Thanks a bunch, if you come across any logos you think are in my wheelhouse feel free to message me. This thread is glorious.

    • Like 1
  3. monopolizing the industry.

    Quoted for truth.

    The monopoly on rights is exactly why the prices are so high. When true competition is allowed prices go down and quality goes up. A monopoly means that the major sports leagues can put as high of a price as they want on the jerseys so long as people still buy them. They take such issue with 'counterfeits' because they really put a stitch in the side of their monopoly. Sure they can say, make similar products with the same colors, people will buy them, but the fact of the matter is authentic jerseys are what the consumer wants. Nobody wants a k-mart shiny t-shirt in place of an authentic jersey. They do not hold a monopoly on team apparel, they hold a monopoly on authentic jerseys, and they're making a killing.

  4. I just had an extended discussion about this with one of my good friends, and the biggest college football fan I know (we're both students at Wisconsin). Neither of us can see the Big T1E1N expanding to the Big T1E2N anytime soon, but we still ran a what would we do scenario.

    So here we go...

    Big Ten-add Mizzou, they're geographically sensible and apparently haven't been on the Big 12's good side recently. Set up North-South divisions, as East-West makes one division (east) a powerhouse compared to the other. This won't clear up the possibility of Ohio State-Michigan playing twice a year, but it's the best we could come up with.

    North

    Minnesota

    Wisconsin

    Iowa

    Michigan State

    Michigan

    Northwestern

    South

    Mizzou

    Illinois

    Purdue

    Indiana

    Penn State

    Ohio State

    That leaves the Big 12 a team short. TCU is not a possibility, for reasons to be explained later, so we're thinking of Houston, they're a bit small, but are competitive in both basketball and football.

    North

    Colorado

    Iowa State

    Kansas

    Kansas State

    Nebraska

    Oklahoma State

    South

    Texas

    Texas A&M

    Texas Tech

    Houston

    Oklahoma

    Baylor

    By not adding TCU to the Big 12 they remain in the Mountain West, which could be made a legitimate conference with the addition of Boise State. We decided that Wyoming or SDSU would be most dropable, with Wyoming at the top. So add Boise State and make Mountain West a BCS conference and we have

    Boise State

    TCU

    UNLV

    SDSU

    Air Force

    BYU

    Colorado State

    Utah

    New Mexico

    A few other ideas we had were for the Big Ten to drop a team and have a Pac-10 like schedule, which is near perfection in our opinion. We don't see this happening any time soon. Another option was to keep things the way they are and have a Big Ten-Big East championship, each team already guaranteed its bowl game. This would just be a moneymaker, but would it make money? Probably not.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.