DCarp1231

There’s literally zero correlation between the Giants new pants and a player choosing to wear a number because of reasons, yet somehow that latter statement constantly gets brought up out of context and without being provoked.

I’ve never liked the Giants uniforms from the Manning-era and the few years prior. They looked their best in the LT-era. The red stripe pants put this set up a few pegs IMO

Love the new look for the Giants

Edmonton’s new home uniform-

Seems like they just chose a placeholder font compared to their previous uniform-

5 hours ago, GoHawks said:

 

Josh Allen wearing the color rush jersey with white pants and it looks spectacular

Just came here to post this. As you said, looks spectacular 

9 minutes ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said:

I’d say our quarterback is a nice, humble guy. He gets drowned out by Jerrah and the fan base, but Dak is definitely someone you can get behind.

I do like Dak to a point, but that point is being the QB of WFT’s rival. Oh, and he’s grotesquely overpaid 

I found more joy in watching Hamilton-Winnipeg (CFL) than I did Pittsburgh-Dallas. Both games were on at the same time.

I suppose it’s because both Pittsburgh and Dallas have arguably the two most annoying fan bases AND teams in the league and I have zero attachments to the CFL.

What does it for me is I always try to find a player on each NFL team I can root for. The Steelers and Cowboys don’t have any of my concern.

I’m hoping that the Frederick Keys, now without team affiliation, will rebrand with a new color set and logo set.

This reeks of late 90s/early 2000s in all the wrong ways 

This will forever be my favorite Lions helmet. Worn in 2016 for the preseason only

35 minutes ago, VDizzle12 said:

 

Seems like everything they've done from 2020 on has been perfect. Field design and graphics for this season are improvements too. Just hope they figure out how to have a real logo one day...

Maybe one day an updated version of this will grace the 50 yard line

Yeah, the Browns uniforms gradually keep getting better

So, tell me again why San Francisco can’t do 3 sleeve stripes and sock stripes?

The thing is, with every Nike rebrand, the team will 100% want its own custom font to differentiate from everyone else.

IMO, the only number font that should have never seen the light of day was Tampa Bay 1.0. They fixed that mistake this time around. The Rams number font is completely fine because at least it’s legible.

The more I look at these, the more I think the blue on the sleeves look like something that belongs on a Bengals jersey

We’re talking about an NFL owner who started out a press conference for the team’s new head coach on the day after New Year’s Day by saying “Happy Thanksgiving”

My vote is still for 32s/Thirty-Twos with a dark horse candidate being (Capitol) Hilltoppers, but chances are we’ll just end up with a refined Football Team/Club identity 

33 minutes ago, Bill0813 said:

They were pushed into doing it, but the fact remains they did it (while the KC Chiefs lay low without any outcry).    Again, it goes back to how they rebrand it.   They could use a different symbol altogether.     The Pentagon is full of warriors, it's not unique to Natives.   Dozens of examples here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrior

 

If Warrior has the historical context you claim, then GS should not be allowed to use it, voluntary rebranding or not.

 

Whatever.   Don't give me Red Wolves which no one associates with DC.   

 

 

They need to stay away from Native American imagery as much as “America! F Yeah!” imagery.

The team could utilize “Warriors” with whatever connotation they want, but everyone would know it’s just “old name+”

14 hours ago, BBTV said:

 

In the last photo here (of Eagles Miles Sanders) even the TV announcers commented that he wouldn't have stumbled up if not for the undershirt.  I think these photos are indisputable evidence that there's some hinderance.  Maybe not for an offensive lineman, but for these guys.  As for why the coaches don't say anything?  I don't know - maybe football coaches aren't as smart as people make them out to be.  They spend too much time trying to draw up plays to exploit mismatches when all they have to do is tell their players to dress like professionals.

 

EDIT: that's actually not the photo of Miles Sanders getting tackled by his shirt, but same point.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Do you have some kind of alert set up where you get notified every time I post so that you can follow it up with some dumb meme or some other thing?  Seriously - you don't need to react to every post I make - especially those that don't concern you.

I mean when you keep regurgitating the same ol “these ‘jabronis’ don’t know how to dress” nonsense, it gets tiresome after a while. Who cares. They get paid millions to do what they love. Look, we all get it. Aesthetically, it looks like crap, but if they want to dress like that to feel comfortable or to (unfortunately) risk injury (which for some reason you’ve been known to wish upon a player), it shouldn’t be your concern.

Want to truly stop the undershirt problem? Maybe these defenders should learn how to tackle properly because obviously holding onto a shirt for dear life isn’t the answer.

19 minutes ago, sleuthpanther said:

I realize that this is the “hindrance” you’re talking about. What I’m saying is that it if it was this huge, game changing  problem, the players OBVIOUSLY wouldn’t do it with so much money on the line. The coaches would OBVIOUSLY say something, and it just wouldn’t happen. But it seems like getting dragged down by their jerseys isn’t a big concern it terms of performance/dosent happen that much, so oh well Again, I get your aesthetic problem with it. But pretending you know more about “the distinct performance difference between an untucked jersey and a tucked jersey”, than actual NFL players Jabronis, is silly. 

FIFY 

Rams get an A+ on this jersey, IMO.

Sleeves look 10x better on retail jerseys 

Warriors and anything “Red-“ is unequivocally a cop out and back door into the team not really dropping the old name.

26 minutes ago, Bill0813 said:

Golden State Warriors have never used any native iconography.   For Washington to assume warriors must equate only to a reference to Native Americans is more insulting.  Don't believe me?  Ask these guys

Even though we knew this a while ago, Washington has formally announced that its new name with not include Native American imagery