DCarp1231

2024 will be the 5th season of Atlanta’s current set. Here’s to hoping we get some droplets about the team working on a new set

Surf by a wide margin

That new logo is a real stinker

Fair. Part of me wonders if they try to pass them off as “fauxbacks”

Now with new ownership terminating the 5 year rule, I wish we had news on a Commanders uniform change. Unfortunately, I don’t see anything happening until 2025. Even then, that would reach the end of the original duration. So not exactly a win people would think it is.

Per rules, the Lions absolutely cannot have a black alternate to pair with their current set. The color has to be within the official palette.

The Rams blue sure does look incredible when it’s not hindered by a roof

There’s a Vikings player wearing yellow cleats, sleeves, and gloves and it looks great

I kind of want the Defenders to get the Cardinals treatment (minus the black alt)

Watching the Ravens/Steelers game has me thinking… How common (or uncommon) are matchups where both starting QBs wear the same number? In this instance, Rudolph and Huntley both wear 2.

UFL teams would be in a good spot to have teams opt out of white away jerseys in favor of light grey or cream. I thought the old New York Guardians set was the best of the XFL revival for this reason-

Judging by those hats, I wouldn’t be surprised if one of the jerseys is just blue and white

The UFL’s smallest stadium is DC’s Audi Field at 20,000 and it regularly sold out for Defenders XFL games if I’m not mistaken.

Here we go again

Nah, that thing is not AR. It’s a D with a line through it. Throw it into the sun.

The cog should be on the helmet. Man, that thing is nice. Also sad to have seen the Renegade “cowboy” reduced to a secondary logo.

The absolute best ones. Screw the “bUt ThEy sUcKeD iN tHeSe” crowd. They rock. A darker shade would be fantastic as well.

If the UFL is smart, they’d put the Roughnecks in recolored Gamblers uniforms minus the side panels.

Isn’t the stadium situation still getting figured out? Games were played at U of H, but now it seems like Rice is a leading contender.

I’ll be honest, I didn’t read all that. Anyway, I guess I understand why they didn’t go that route. It’s not like they could’ve done regional conference names either. 7 out of 9 teams are all clumped together. Michigan and DC being the only not midwest or southern teams. Three teams within Texas doesn’t help matters either. Choosing to keep the Gamblers roster and coaching staff, keeping them in the USFL Conference, but slapping the Roughnecks identity on them is a pretty dumb and confusing move too.

Still doesn’t answer the question.

They had every chance to name the conferences USFC and XFC, but just had to keep “League” in there. For what purpose?

Too much white and too many drop shadows.

Wow, that iteration of the UFL was a fever dream.