MJWalker45 Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 While in the US it's normal for a men's and women's team that are owned by the same group to have different logos I was surprised to see a few teams outside of the United States that have this as well: Houston Dynamo/Houston Dash Portland Timbers/Portland Thorns These two also have to deal with different uniform makers due to league contracts. Mexico (Monterrey FC/Rayadas FC) Chivas de Guadalajara/Guadalajara Feminil The ladies are even using a different template from the men this year, as well as a different primary sponsor. London Bees/Barnet FC I'm sure that the Australian A Leagues (Men and Women) may have these contrasting logos as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMU Posted April 30, 2021 Share Posted April 30, 2021 The difference is essentially corporate structure. It's much more common for European teams to just be units of the same club, like Barcelona having soccer, basketball, etc. It's the same principle as the Knicks and Rangers still being different entities despite both being owned by James Dolan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted May 5, 2021 Author Share Posted May 5, 2021 On 4/30/2021 at 11:43 AM, LMU said: The difference is essentially corporate structure. It's much more common for European teams to just be units of the same club, like Barcelona having soccer, basketball, etc. It's the same principle as the Knicks and Rangers still being different entities despite both being owned by James Dolan. Good point. I was thinking specifically soccer where the owner, technically runs both teams but we did see it somewhat when the WNBA started and borrowed the colors of their NBA counterparts but not their logos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.