slapshot Posted January 20, 2004 Share Posted January 20, 2004 I'm not surprised the Bruins are in the middle-bottom range. As I stated before, the owner is more concerned about revenues and the money from the fans in the seats than putting a good product on the ice. It's been that way for years and years and the fans have had enough.Those attendance reports should be stacked up against ticket prices too. I think Boston is near the top 5 in ticket prices, which is another reason the fans are staying away. The team does not win much at home and there are a lot of non-names and cheaper has-been players on the team (the result of waiting for a player's market value to drop doesn't exactly leave the cream of the crop for free agents). Why pay on average $60 a ticket to see players you don't know? If I want that I'll go to an AHL game for $10. Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winters in buffalo Posted January 20, 2004 Share Posted January 20, 2004 You might want to double-check Buffalo's capacity again. I'm pretty sure it's only 18.6 for hockey, 19.5 is the concert set-up.And the sick thing about Carolina is, those are the distribution numbers, not in-house attendance. I'm willing to be the actual is closer to 9,000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted January 20, 2004 Author Share Posted January 20, 2004 Good work nitroseed, as mockba stated those teams with 100+% have standing room + all their seats filled... standing room doesn't count in the capacity figure.intheend88, these are for home games only. --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.