Jump to content

mcj882000

Members
  • Posts

    906
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

mcj882000 last won the day on December 19 2016

mcj882000 had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Calgary... (dramatic pause) Alberta, Canada

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

mcj882000's Achievements

1.1k

Reputation

  1. Funny, speaking as one of the "overzealous social justice wokescolds" some of y'all are talking about, I really like it. Sure I would have preferred Spiders, and sure the winged-G logo is a little bit goofy, but I really like the pinched-in block C cap logo, and I have a friend of mine who pitched me this name for a video game hockey team years ago, so I already know about its pretty-cool backstory. Besides, pro sports could use a little bit of goofiness, in my humble opinion. As one buddy of mine on Discord put it: out with the "IN", in with the "GUAR". 8/10
  2. Reviving this thread because last week I watched... Damn Yankees! (1958) - A disgruntled, middle-aged Washington Senators fan sells his soul to the devil so he can become their star slugger. (Incidentally I really liked this sweater design before I knew it was also what they wore in this film.)
  3. Bergevin's basically hoping that Price's $10M contract is too steep for Seattle to take on. He's had years of bad personnel decisions he's made somehow working out for him, but I think he's really pushing his luck this time.
  4. If it was for the Home Run Derby I wouldn't even give these terrible jerseys a second thought, but they want them worn during the game for the first time ever... Woof. I know it's a small problem in the grand scheme of things, but it really is emblematic at how utterly out-of-touch MLB is with its own fanbase, and how bad their people's decision-making skills are in general. EDIT: but on the flipside I guess it makes MLB The Show more realistic; matter of fact the only baseball video games I've ever seen get the "ASG players wear their own jerseys" thing right was MLB Power Pros.
  5. If you actually believed the "helmet ads are only for one year" stuff, you're now officially a sucker.
  6. Which is how many teams, out of curiosity? (Also to be clear, it reminded me of the Dodgers because it was specifically a dark-coloured cursive script (that I actually did briefly mistake for navy blue in at least one shot due to the lighting) with red numbers.)
  7. The last expansion team to pick 1st overall in their first draft was Atlanta in 1999, and that was only because Vancouver traded them Tampa Bay's 1st-overall pick for Atlanta's 2nd. The last expansion team to be given the 1st pick without needing to trade for it is, AFAIK, Tampa Bay in 1992. (Though the Panthers & Ducks were given the 1st & 2nd picks in 1994, their 2nd draft, even though they finished 6th & 11th-worst in the previous season, and the draft lottery wasn't implemented until the next year.)
  8. According to the mothership, the New York Yankees wore multicoloured pinstripes of blue, red and green for one season in 1915: (Y'all don't know how badly I want this silly old jersey in MLB The Show.)
  9. The new rules don't really bother me, but then again I'm Canadian - we already have wide receivers in single-digit numbers and other such madness, lol Also just from a practical standpoint I think it's a good move; with the restrictions they had the NFL seemed to be the first sport in line to run into the problem of "if you retire too many numbers you will eventually run out of numbers", hence why teams like the Bears had to announce they'd no longer retire numbers at all. This'll probably kick that can down the road a bit, at least.
  10. So if I have this whole mess right, it's a bunch of spoiled rich teams wanting to make their own league so they don't ever have to worry about potential relgation, and to make even more obscene amounts of money, vs. two of the most corrupt institutions in all of sports? ...Is there any way we can have both sides lose?
  11. The fact that said economic systems aren't presently in widespread use is irrelevant to the point that, yes, professional sports can indeed exist outside of capitalism.
  12. I know we've passed this argument already and I don't intend to drag us back to it, I've already made my thoughts clear on it the first time we went through it; but I just wanted to comment on one reply before moving on: Yeah, professional sports never existed in other economic systems, right? oh wait, right, oops
  13. Yes, this is the appeal of them, at least for me - they look stupid and I love them for it
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.