Jump to content

sportstar1212

Members
  • Posts

    4,746
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by sportstar1212

  1. I consider myself pretty good- but maybe someone can tell me if I'm wrong. I believe all of these are fake- Some are worse then others, but they all look legit to me too. I'm pissed at the speed Nike let this happen.

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Nike-NY-Jets-Tim-Tebow-Youth-Jersey-New-W-Tags-XL-Green-/400313371911?pt=US_Football_Fan_Shop&hash=item5d34894d07

    This one if it wasn't attributed I'd believe is a authentic blank.

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-York-Jets-Nike-John-Conner-Jersey-GREEN-Size-40-M-/180967200505?pt=US_Football_Fan_Shop&hash=item2a227c56f9

    This one I just can't tell

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/COLTS-ANDREW-LUCK-JERSEY-48-NIKE-XL-STITCHED-NWT-/200815668885?pt=US_Football_Fan_Shop&hash=item2ec18bee95

    or this one

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/SEATTLE-SEAHAWKS-NFL-JERSEY-RICE-STITCHED-SCREENED-NIKE-ADULT-SIZE-48-XL-52-/130758568894?pt=US_Football_Fan_Shop&hash=item1e71d16bbe

    Or this one:

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/CHICAGO-BEARS-NIKE-ELITE-AUTHENTIC-JAY-CUTLER-FOOTBALL-JERSEY-NAVY-SIZE-48-/261094344739?pt=US_Football_Fan_Shop&hash=item3cca6f8823

    Usually when a seller has multiples of the same jersey in the same size, they are fake. But- I don't know, once again. Reebok was so much easier.

    Here's my opinion on them (in order)

    1. I believe it's a replica. Fakes never come in regular sizes (S,M,L, etc.), they come in authentic sizes (48,52,56, etc.) It also doesn't have the flywire.

    2. The price screams fake to me. It looks like it is.

    3. It think it's fake, but it's a pretty good one.

    4. Most definitely a fake.

    5. Again, the price has me thinking it's fake.

    Hope this helps.

  2. it looks cool .

    Apparently the kids have changed the definition of cool from "good" to "terrible".

    Loooooooooooooooooogodud has a very :censored:ed up mind, so his opinions on things differ greatly from ours.

    Also, I noticed that whenever you search any team's jerseys Google images, the majority of the results are fake jerseys. Something that really bugs the hell out of me.

  3. Anyone know a site I can at least get at least half decent if not better knock off nfl jerseys just to use as a training jersey

    to sum up

    there are so many sites . such as

    tarajersey

    weiketrade

    kennyjersey

    yuki

    toonjersey

    jersey101

    of course there are more ...you can just check them

    Loogoduded3.png

    EDIT: I just realized that 12 of looooooooooooooooooooooooooogodud 2.0's 14 posts are in this thread supporting the Chinese counterfeiters and IP theft.

  4. For those that are debating buying a $30-$40 knock off or the $100 replica jersey I will put it to you like this.

    The quality of the material on the knock offs are just as good if not better than the replica. Nike makes all of their products in third world countries just like the bootleggers but unlike the bootleggers they have a high overhead to cover with licensing, advertising, and endorsement deals. Also, while you can tell a knock off from an authentic upon close inspection you can spot the "cheap" replica a mile away.

    I LOL'd

    If I'm not mistaken I'm thinking this guy is on here just to promote that site that he is likely employed by, or runs himself. If they are of higher quality than the licensed ones then why on earth not charge more? It is better product after all no? I'm also pretty sure you don't need close inspection to see that the colour of a jersey is incorrect, or that the logo is 10 times to big.

    first, i'm discussing about the topic here with everybody .second, i didnt refer that the knockoffs are of higher quality than the licened ones , i mean they are nearly the same if you check my message carefully .

    Then you have zero knowledge about quality or IP theft.

    I'm really starting to believe that this guy is Loooooooooooooooooooooooooogodude.

  5. Oh, I have no problem with teams using brown. When it's used right, it looks good and teams should use it more. The only problem is that options are so limited. I would love it if the Bruins wore their yellow/brown uniforms againand I know there are a lot of Padres fans who wish they'd bring back the brown/yellow uniforms.

    Ditto... if were talking about the Winter Classic ones that is. The shade of brown on that is dark enough to work.

    Yes, I meant the Winter Classic uniforms.

    The Bruins WC unis are a perfect example of how to do brown right.

  6. The ball-in-glove is a fantastic logo, but the current Brewers identity is much more fitting for the name.

    too bad they cant combine the eras together..... wait a minute! they can and should.

    No, they can't. The BiG would look completely out of place with the current set.

    (And the BiG is not that great of a logo)

    You could always recolor the ball in glove to Navy and Gold, maybe tilt it a little too. and alter the M logo to take a little detail from the barley? out and dull the M a little. Same with the actual word mark. You'd tilt the glove a little to add the same effect the wordmark seems to have. Or straighten out the wordmark.

    I love both Brewers identities, but I agree with Nash here, the current identity is much more fitting for the name.

    I'm good with them wearing the BiG uniforms on Retro Sundays.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.