RayFinkle

The big logos..... awesome!!

The shield........ looking good.

Rams end zone......meh. Not much that could be done with it to make it pop. Yellow would have been coooool.

Bengals end zone......needs more orange. Why the the white wordmark? Why couldn't it be their home field end zones designs??!!

Meh on the end zones. Wanted more orange.

The Logos look great though, love the size of them.

The trend to remove the Conference Logos and not have the endzone wordmark outlined continues to piss me off.

For christsake, the SB is the AFC vs. the NFC!! 

Hideous kit for the USMNT tonight. 

Sorry for the thread bump.

C'mon Bengals!! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE WIN!!!!!!!

5 hours ago, RamosLynn said:

More of a minimalistic approach here. Thought it was perhaps something original in the endzones, combining it with my favourite on-field template ever. Dueling helmets with SB logo in the middle (Super Bowls XXXI-XXXVII).

 

 

WOW. Crazy cool, fun, and unique. Therefore, the NFL would NEVER even consider it.

On 1/19/2022 at 10:17 AM, flyersfan said:

Anything played on grass will feel much better than anything on turf.

 

This Page (GUD) has all the uniforms and field designs for all the Super Bowls

 Agreed. Grass, outside, can make up for an ok uni matchup. I wish every SB was played outside on grass in CA, FL, etc...

Awesome website there! I wonder what went into the decision/thinking for SB's XL & XLI, where the Conference Logos were highlighted in the end zones.....did it twice then never went back to it.

The gold end zone for the Saints in XLIV -- I loved that.  I thought for sure it would be black, so that was a nice surprise.

Dolphins have great end zones.

Oh man that powder blue end zone is sexy! Looks great. Hopefully if the Titans make it, that would be the end zone.

I just can't understand why the NFL switched up their SB end zone template to these. Why oh why.

Who in their right mind thinks the 'off-centered' logo and work mark actually looks good?!?!? Put some space between the two! What you have is the corners of the end zone with TOO much empty space. Just paint is there. Ugh!

Best thread ever!!!!!!

Since my Eagles have a miniscule chance of making the SB, give me a Packers/Bengals one.

Meh. 

It's just ridiculously crazy how posters on this board can design a better SB field than the NFL. And by far!!

Awesome fields, amkirby10. The Pewter endzone is sweet. Gosh how I miss the Conference logos.

The real Bucs SB endzone is just too dark for me. Darkish red with darkish gray wordmark = no pop. Chiefs endzone is spectacular, the red, the white the yellow, three colors make it happen.

Booooooooooo Bucs! Booooooo! 

Wanted to see red/pewter.

Chiefs yellow endzone is perfect.

23 minutes ago, RamosLynn said:

 

 

Rose Bowl is my favourite, too. And yeah, unfortunately though that is on the Bucs colours. That happened in Super Bowl XXXVII as well, to a degree. Only way to make it actually "pop" is with a White endzone or something, which is not possible.

For the Bucs, how about a white wordmark outlined in pewter? Or outlined in black? Keep the red endzone but just swap the color for the wordmark maybe?

17 hours ago, RamosLynn said:

I will never ever pretend to be anywhere near as talented as Pitt or anyone that actually knows how to do this. I just got images and pasted them on top of other images just to make a concept for fun... This would be close to my "ideal" design for a Super Bowl field... Too much stuff? Maybe the logos of the Bucs and Chiefs are a bit too big, but I feel like concept is understood here. To be honest, I may have different designs in the endzone as far as it does not need to be plain color.

 

This is friggin brilliant! And beautiful. Love that the field actually looks like grass! LOL

Logos are a bit to big. I soooooo miss the Conference Logos in the endzones.

Agree about the SB's in Cali, just perfect. Outside, grass, starts in the day, ends at night. Might be why the Rose Bowl is my favorite College Bowl game.

The Bucs endzone, I don't know, it just reads too dark for me. No pop at all. Darkish red with a dark wordmark. I can barely read the wordmark.

^^^^^^

I wonder why the SF logo is on both 25 yard lines. I guess they are the home team, but you would have thought the Broncos logo would be on their side of the 50 yard line.

Really hope it's not a Red/Red endzone.

I am glad though that there have been two straight non-Blue teams in the SB.

Pitt,  why do you think that a red Chiefs endzone for this years SB would have a yellow wordmark instead of a white one? 

10 hours ago, cdh72469 said:

I would just love to know who at the NFL offices decided to make Super Bowl fields' end zones asymmetrical or unbalanced by removing the conference logos and the fields BLAH with just plain white numbers.

A group of morons in the Creative Marketing Department. Pure stupidity and utter laziness!!

Some good endzone matchups. Glad the Bills are the final blue team, as at least their wordmark might/should be outlined in red. Seahawks and Colts would be so boring with just the all white wordmark. 

Two blue teams could be eliminated today! Wooooo Hooo! Maybe another SB with no blue endzones!! Two years in row, could it happen?!?!?! 

Although I wouldn't mind seeing a light blue one. The Titans would probably go dark blue though.

It highly irks me that the NFL puts the logo so damn close to the wordmark!! My Eagles endzone looked STUPID in the SB versus the Pats a couple of years back. WHY, NFL, WHY???

Why the boring, plain, uninspired designs over the past X years. Makes me...

8 hours ago, MJWalker45 said:

LSU's colors would have looked horrible on that, even if they went yellow with purple or white outlines. 

I guess we agree to disagree.   As I think the yellow from LSU would have been nice looking within the black end zones. 

But then we agree on the fact that the Superdome seems to HATE painted end zones. They seem to never have them painted in. Laziness, I guess.

Ahhhhh I love the black endzones!! Was pissed that last year they were not painted.