RayFinkle

Yeah, it does look good, pitt.  And the green >>> black.  Just wished they put the shield in a corner.  

I wonder why the Eagles changed their end zone this season.  As an Iggle fan, I like it, it's nice to see the green end zone, as they usually only painted them black in the past.

Could just be me, but it seems that the endzones and SB logos always get washed out, but the NFL shield always looks good. Am I crazy or does anyone see that too?

I really like the contrasting colors of the sideline boxes.

I hate to say it, but for that..................good job NFL.

^^^^

I agree with the paint on the 50.  But, would the paint on the 20's be to close to the paint/SB logos at the 25??  Meaning, the paint on the outside of the 20 would be butted right up against the SB logo.

Hooray!! The Falcons endzone is Red!! HOOORRAAAYYY!!  And.............whew!

On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, I'd give this field a 6.5.

The NFL shield better go from 45 to 45.  NO small arsed shield, like the puny one for Broncos/Seahawks.  At least the Pats logo isn't under their wordmark.  Eee gad that would look awful.

Get your head outta your butts, NFL!!

Saw a post with a pic of the field over in the Sports Logos section with some paint down on the sideline box for the Falcons.  And its painted.................................BLACK.  NOT RED.  

God help me if the endzones are blue and black, just like last year, with no outlining of the teams wordmarks.  SMFH.

No Conference logos again!?!?!!?!!!!!!!!!!!  Ugghhhh............stupid NFL.  And I'm sure the Pats workmark won't be outlined in red, and the Falcons won't be outlined in black. Which would only make both look pretty darn good!

I'm good with the Falcons going with red endzones.  Didn't want to see a repeat of last years endzones, with the AFC in blue and NFC in black.

pitt!!!!!!!!!!

Are you going to hook us up with some Super Bowl matchup fields? 

New NFL Rule: All home teams must paint their endzones for the playoffs. LOL

Love the Dolphins blue endzones.  

Browns brown endzone, I liked too.  But on game day it always seemed - at least on my TV - that the brown paint was so washed out.  

18 hours ago, GridironUniform said:

 

I don't know if there is room to submit a hypothetical field in this thread without causing any confusion (maybe this could be a new thread in itself) -- but how about a hypothetical AFC Championship field at Gillette Stadium, circa 2002 or so.  I realize now that the two Steelers-Patriots title games were in Pittsburgh, and the game logo I used was from 2005, so this never happened on a couple levels, but none-the-less here it is with color end zones (and opponent's end zone) in all their glory.  I think I may start a whole thread with what Conference Championship fields could (or should) have looked like....

 

AWESOME!!  Good lord that Pats end zone is a million times better than their past two SB ones.  A shame that the NFL is so just, just, well, I don't even have the word for how terrible the NFL is when it comes to this kind of stuff. 

Put the AFCCG logos at the 25 and you just blew my mind, sir.

On 2/25/2016 at 7:39 PM, pitt6pack said:

Patriots 2006 early season grass

 

I'm having some hard times finding a good image of Foxboro stadium in '01, but if I had to guess it would be like this field except with just the wordmark in the endzones and no Gillette Stadium logos. I found an image for this field though and it looked so nice I had to make it.

I've already posted and said this field looks great.  If there was some red paint in those end zones, WOW, what a field.  An incredible regular season field.  But I know painted end zones on a grass field in the North East climate would most likely not work out, LOL.

That Pats field looks pretty good.

Just a memory, I could be wrong, but does anyone remember a Titans playoff game at Tenn in which the endzones were painted red?

On 2/3/2016 at 8:53 PM, CATLogo1 said:

Am I the only one posting on this thread who thinks the NFL and the Levi's Stadium grounds crew screwed up by not painting the AFC/NFC conference logos in the teams' end zones? Or was this just part of the end zone design? I really hate the paint job on the Super Bowl 50 field. At least the team logos/wordmarks are aligned properly, but IMO, this is an incomplete field w/o the conference logos.

Quite a few people think it's messed up that the Conference logos are not in the end zones.  

Not sure if you've seen this thread: http://boards.sportslogos.net/topic/106590-super-bowl-50-aesthetics/

The Broncos end zone is kinda growing on me. I like it much better than the Pats.

Looks good, pitt.

NFC end zones, I like. And like others have said, yaaaayyy to a non blue/blue end zone matchup.

Cool old one here, for a great contrasting end zone. Can't see the field though, LOL. Sorry.

I just love the yellow vs. black contrast.

Would the Chiefs word mark in the endzone be white maybe?

I guess there wouldn't be any Bengal stripes in their endzone?

Thanks pitt.

Love your fields and end zones.

Personally, I'm praying for a non blue end zone, LOL. Redskins/Bengals would be a great end zone matchup.

I'm digging the gold too, for the logos. Looks real nice. As long as the NFL ensures that they are BIG come game day, that is.

That Titans/Rams field is just simply gorgeous. Would love to see that field/game replayed outside, on grass, with the sun shining on the field!

Colts/Seahawks, two teams I don't want to ever see in the SB again.

Am I the only one who like the old AFC and NFC logos (shown above) a lot, like A LOT more than the new ones (below)?

Especially the AFC logo. That just looks miserable now.

I'm with you. The old AFC looks just too good.

Yep, the natural grass made the field/logos look pretty good. Hate the SB fields with that field turf crap, the paint looks so washed out so quickly (Seahawks/Broncos, Ravens/49ers). What a novel concept....playing football outside on natural grass!!

Loved the big shield, and the SB logos look good too.

Loved the natural sunlight coming into the stadium too. Only issue for me was the endzones.

Hmmmm, interesting question above about why GB went from yellow to green endzones.

I am starting to lose all faith in the NFL. Really? Why is the Seahawk endzone the same as last year? And with regards to the Patriots endzone: what is this? college football? Who is in charge of the field design? and why do they think this is a good idea? It's probably the same goon who thinks it's a good idea to have a standardized logo every year for the Super Bowl. I mean for God's sake, at the very least, go back to outlining the 50 in red and blue and the 20s in the team colors. There are not enough words to describe my dislike for this field and the fields of the past 4-7 years.

Agree with all of this.

I was rooting for GB so damn hard, just because I wanted to see some color in the endzones, LOL. Yes, I'm at that point in my NFL viewing. If my Eagles can't get to the SB, then I'll root for the best colors, haha.