kolob

I'm more than okay with the Pacers sticking with the gold jersey.

But, the question is ... what made them hideous? Was it the design or the sleeves? The design itself (besides being BFBS) isn't THAT bad. The sleeves killed it.

I'm in different on which look I like better, but it's just nice to see the Wolves WIN in these jerseys, because they are solid. It blows my mind with the fact that if the T'Wolves win out and win the championship they'll have won more games in these playoffs than the whole 1991-92 season.

I still wish they would have gone with the Las Vegas Stars to go in line with the (Utah) Starzz, (San Antonio) Silver Stars and Stars names along with the former MiLB team Las Vegas Stars.

I like the idea. But, naming a women's team after a dog mascot just sets them up for some unflattering nicknames.

I agree. However, I am okay with the City Jerseys that are in team colors with no stupid HEAT CULTURE-like text. Additionally, I hate road teams wearing white on the road more so in the playoffs. I'm fine color vs. color, but I wish teams would keep things a little bit more traditional.

The Thunder really need to lean more into orange. But, generally speaking, as generic as their logo and jerseys may be ... the team colors are solid.

I prefer Salt Lake as well, but the funding bill for the arena upgrades, etc. require any team to use the "Utah" moniker.

Color me shocked if Yeti doesn't win.

kinda looks like Sam the Eagle.

I'm honestly just expected the current City Jersey being promoted to the Icon and then a similar white and black set made for the Association and Statement jerseys.

I honestly don't hate this. And, I think for a winter sport team they should lean into the local winter/ski culture.

Not to mention, I believe the Nuggets were also the first NBA club to start the trend of simply recoloring the logo instead of designing a new one? Or was it the Pistons? If I remember correctly this was because the NBA began charging something like $500,000 for logo changes? Of course, of the significant changes the Jazz (twice), Hawks, Wizards, Bobcats, Bucks, Raptors, etc. followed suit. That said, the 2003 change for the Nuggets was much better than the original logo from 1993.

Yeah, the laxing of the helmet design rules has me a LITTLE worried about the NFL. Rules are meant to be broken.

Agreed. If this is the name that wins, they should take a page out of the Kraken playbook and not make the Yeti the focal point. Hide him like the Kraken do and make him mysterious.

It's better than the previous flag, but pretty despised locally.

I don't mind the Pacers/Bucks color vs. color match-ups, but yeah ... there needs to be some general playoff rules in the NBA. No City or Throwback Editions during the playoffs. No Association (or white) Edition worn by the road team. Color vs. Color is cool during the first couple of rounds. Conference and NBA Finals should be strictly White at Home and Color on Road.

I'm a little surprised that they didn't give the Jets 2.0 the Jets 1.0 history. Maybe they would in 5 years if the Coyotes don't come back? Yeah, I have many questions here as well.

Not that it helps the case for the name, but seagulls eat trash. Here in Utah you're more likely to see seagulls at the dump rather than the GSL.

Oh man, I am excited! ARENA FOOTBALL IS BACK BABY!

Reason #1 why the Utah Fury is a TERRIBLE decision

I am in this same boat. I am not a fan of the Utah Elk, but the Utah Gulls works on both levels of being the state bird and being the name of a past MiLB team. Just don't know how easy it would be to wrestle from San Diego?

Yeah, that's a different sect of polygamists unrelated to the FLDS. The Kingston Clan is definitely as messed up as the Jeffs/FLDS group.

I won't lie ... I had the same thought. Plus, Salt Lake City MORE so in the mountains than Denver is. Denver is basically Kansas.