jkrdevil Posted October 2, 2005 Share Posted October 2, 2005 What confusing about it.2 Points for a win1 point for an OT loss0 Points for a regulation loss. If they're gonna award 1 point for an OT loss, then I'd like to see it look like this:Regulation win: 3 ptsOvertime win : 2 ptsOvertime loss: 1 ptRegulation loss: 0 pts Yea, I like that. Winning in regulation should be more than winning what could be a gimmick (Shootout). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted October 2, 2005 Share Posted October 2, 2005 I agree with some of what you've said, but Montreal will not miss the playoffs. Losing Brisebois wasnt that big of a loss. Teams to watch out for this year (they won't necessarily make the playoffs but they'll be close) are:Eastern Conference: Florida, Pittsburgh, AtlantaWestern Conference: Chicago, Columbus and Nashville (I love the Predators lineup!)Toronto will not make the playoffs but the remaining 5 Canadian teams will! GO SENS GO! "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted October 2, 2005 Author Share Posted October 2, 2005 The Rangers will not win 20 games this year they are going to bad as bad as the expansion Sharks were they are awful they are horrendous and in goal is the worst goalie in the NHL Kevin Weekes. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted October 2, 2005 Share Posted October 2, 2005 What confusing about it.2 Points for a win1 point for an OT loss0 Points for a regulation loss. If they're gonna award 1 point for an OT loss, then I'd like to see it look like this:Regulation win: 3 ptsOvertime win : 2 ptsOvertime loss: 1 ptRegulation loss: 0 pts I agree. I think every game should award the same number of points. Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse." BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD POTD (Shared) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafs13 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 No way are the Leafs finishing with just 76 points! I guarentee it! (But if they were some how that bad, I sure hope Pat Quinn is fired!)My opinion:Teams with too many points in the preview:LightningBruinsThrashersIslandersCanucks***Los Angeles Super Cool Eggplant Colored Ducks of the State of California in Anaheim**PredatorsFlames**-more than 10 off***-more than 15 offTeams with not enough points in the preview:CanadiensPenguinsLeafs***RangersRed WingsWild**Avalanche**Stars**-more than 10 off***-more than 15 offAgain, just my crazy thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwtrailtrekker Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 I hope you predictions about the Canucks are right, except for the losing in the Stanley Cup Finals part.....Good job overall, I liked how you made some make some riskier predictions (Nashville first in division) than others because most magazines end up predicting the same 16 teams making it to the playoffs, just in a different order.WELL DONE i agree with you on that! its the 2005-2006 season, which is also the year of the dog in 2006 and look at what the Canucks have done during the year of the dog-1970-Canucks are born1982-1st Stanley Cup Final Appearance1994-2nd Stanley Cup Final Appearance2006-3rd Stanley Cup Final Appearance, 1st Stanley Cup?we'll just have to wait and see how it'll be played out. 3rd time is the charm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yankee Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 I think those are some interesting picks. Very interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief. Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Miss the playoffs? My Avalanche? NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigga Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 There's no way anyone can predict the hockey season...there's nothing to go on from last year and like 1/3 of the players changed teams or something. Good effort though. Go Devils! On January 16, 2013 at 3:49 PM, NJTank said: Btw this is old hat for Notre Dame. Knits Rockne made up George Tip's death bed speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HatCityEnforcer Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 The Rangers will not win 20 games this year they are going to bad as bad as the expansion Sharks were they are awful they are horrendous and in goal is the worst goalie in the NHL Kevin Weekes. less than 20 wins for the Blueshirts?Put down the crack pipe, please...They're not gonna contend, but they're not Washington bad....at least there's a tiny bit of talent there. FANTASY TEAMSHousatonic U. Dragons (NCFA Basketball): 16-6 (8-4 Conf.)--National Runner-UpJersey State U. (NCFA Football): Inaugural Year - 2006Motor City Silverhawks (WArFL): 9-4 (3rd--National Conf.)Lehigh Valley Ironmen (WAmFL): Inaugural Season--2006New England Marauders RFC (RLI): 6-0-7 (6th place)Detroit Spirit (AA): 3-6 (T-4th--Patriot League)Brooklyn Atlantics (IBF): 10-5 (1st--Appalachian Conf.)Boston Mariners RFU (WRU): Coming Soon!New York Americans (SHL): Inaugural Season - 2006-07 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.