nuordr

The helmet and the pants with stripes make this a beautiful uniform. In other news, the Troy Trojans are bring back black helmets in 2022:

Illinois has a new turf design for the upcoming season

I'd much rather that striping pattern the pants instead of plain gold pants. But I would rather have stripes that match the helmet stripe.

If that were the case, the college football teams in hot states wouldn't wear dark jerseys at home. I don't believe heat has anything to do with it, especially with the fabric these uniforms are made out of these days. Besides that, why would Tampa even wear the pewter pants at home with the white jersey? Seriously, if the dark jersey is an issue, than why not white pants at home all the time as well.

I feel the same way on why they don't wear a red facemask.

Houston Gamblers: https://fb.watch/beaHufIMCG/

Houston Gamblers: I posted that as well as the video on the last page.

Tampa Bay Bandits:

I wish they went with the original gray pants as the facemask would've tied to the overall look.

Pittsburgh Maulers:

Birmingham Stallions:

I'll take the numbers on the shoulders and the stripes on the sleeves. If the Packers can do it, so can the Cardinals

Yeah, I was just referring the Football Team as I didn't want to offend anyone going back before that time. IndianapolisCubs2009

According to Trucolor.net, The Burgundy (#651C32), Gold (#FFB81C) and White(#FFFFFF) are the same as before. The black is completely new #010101. @TruColor Isn't that correct?

Over on my Sports Aesthetics page, I was asked to build a survey to grade each part of the Washington Commanders rebrand from the team name, logos, and uniform parts. If you would like to participate, here is the link to the survey.

I just found another issue with the rebrand. Apparently, the team put the wrong years in their secondary logo for years they won the Super Bowl. 1983 should be 1982 1998 should be 1987 1992 should be 1991

Here is my review of the name, logo, and uniforms I just posted to our Sports Aesthetics blog. Team Name Grade: B - I believe the new name could be better, but anything was better than Football Team and trust me, the name could have been much worse. Logos: Main Logo: B - Once again, not the best logo, but it is simple, and you will identify the team immediately. Typeface: C - I wish they would have put the line above Commanders above Washington. Team Crest: C - I like that this logo shows the date the team was founded, the three stars either represents the DC flag or the number of Super Bowls the team has won. Update: It was brought to my attention that the team added the wrong years to this logo for when they won a Super Bowl: 1983 should be 1982 1988 should be 1987 1992 should be 1991 Logo Overall Grade: B Helmets: Burgundy Helmet: D - I like the new satin finish, the stripe, the logo. I hate the facemask as it should be gold like previous helmets. Black Helmet: F - I hate the black. I hate the numbers on the side of the helmet, the W on the front of the helmet, and no stripe. Helmets Overall Grade: D Jerseys: Burgundy Jersey: D - By far the best jersey of all 3 released, but still far from stellar. I like the stripes on the sleeves and the number font is not bad, I dislike the Commanders name on the chest as it is too big, no TV Numbers is a big no-no for me. White Jersey: F - Awful design and no consistency with the burgundy jerseys as the numbers, sleeve stripe pattern is different. The gradient numbers are a disaster (did management not now about the hate the Rams received from their gradient numbers?) The Washington typeface across the chest is small compared to the burgundy jersey and makes it hard to read. Black Jersey: F - Another different and awful design from the team. No sleeve stripes, a different number font, a stupid Commander patch on the front chest, secondary logo on one arm, the DC flag on the other arm. Jerseys Overall Grade: F - No consistency, no tv numbers, just a bad overall design. Pants: Pants Overall Grade: F - All the pants are the same color as the jerseys. The pants are all plain, with no stripes and awful. Socks: Socks Overall Grade: F All the socks are a solid and color as the jerseys and pants. Overall Grade: F Failure and they need to hit the reset button immediately. It is so bad, that they didn't even have a name last season, but their uniforms were still a Top 15 look. This new uniform will go immediately to the near bottom, second worst look in the league behind the Jaguars, maybe even in last place. Issues: No stripes on the pants No consistency in the design between the Home, Road, and Alternative uniforms No gold pants No gold facemask No TV numbers No striping pattern on the burgundy helmet to match the sleeve stripes of the burgundy jersey (the best part of the entire uniform set) Adding BFBS, Black for Black Sake to a uniform color palette that DID NOT need black. Typeface different on all jerseys Did I mention no stripes on the pants Black helmet Stupid W on black helmet Players numbers on black helmet Military style font on 2 of the 4 jerseys Gradient numbers on the white jersey

In the back of my mind, I kind of feel like this is Dan Synder giving everyone the middle finger and laughing because he knows deep down that this bad and he was against the name change from day 1.

I am friends with the President of the largest Washington team fan club and he said they are not going over well with his group at all.

I mean this is better, but without stripes on the pants, I will never love this rebrand. Right now I would give it a F.

No stripes on the pants...this is awful:

Nothing can be worse than the plain Jaguars, but these may be right behind. That says a lot from me considering I loathe the Titans uniforms, but at least thier uniforms have consistency where these potential jerseys do not.

Worst post of the year so far. Gray facemasks never look good without gray on other parts of the uniform.

That is almost as bad as the Rams bone.

That would make their whole set a Top 3 look.