Jump to content

Soarindude

Members
  • Posts

    1,733
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Soarindude last won the day on March 30 2014

Soarindude had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

7,046 profile views

Soarindude's Achievements

121

Reputation

  1. Unpopular opinion: I don't have a problem with asymmetrical designs whatsoever, and I believe more teams should give it a shot. Unfortunately, I believe Charlotte executed it poorly.
  2. I think the consensus on these boards is that the Jacksonville helmet you posted above is the best helmet Jacksonville has ever had.
  3. I disagree with your statement about the NFL being diluted. 12 good QBs? Not by a long shot. In fact, I could easily think of 4-5 backup QBs that could easily serve as starting QBs if given the chance. The NFL is the most balanced league based on talent out of the big 4 easily.
  4. A conversation is going on over on failed Expansion teams and one was an NFL team in Portland. I figured I should post in this thread about Portland in the future. ---- 20 years from now we will see Portland in the NFL. But not from relocation , but from expansion. It is highly unlikely that the NFL even considers keeping the amount of teams in the league at 32. Expect to see at least 4 teams added by 2035.
  5. In what world is that color scheme "bland".
  6. I think the Green Bay Packers are excused of the idiocracy. Because for the life of me I cannot think of anything that represents the Green Bay Packers better than the infamous G.
  7. The beauty of the promotion/relegation system is really lost if teams can't be promoted based on the standards set by the league. And this is why a pro/rel system won't be put in place until at least 15 teams under the MLS are in the financial position to succeed in the MLS.
  8. The only thing wrong with both of those uniform concepts is that they incorporate a pointless black uniform. Would've much rather seen a yellow jersey.
  9. I think there was more of a worry that the Jaguars would move the team to England because of his ownership connection with Fulham.
  10. Who would've thought this look would be lightyears better than what they have now. That switch to nike really cost the Seahawks. I'd love to see a remake of these uniforms, and they'd sell like hot-cakes.How is this any different than what Nike always gets criticized for?Neon "volt" color? Check. No real design other than contrasting sleeves? Check. Yet because it's not Nike, it gets a pass? Because this: Looks 10 million times better Than this:
  11. Who would've thought this look would be lightyears better than what they have now. That switch to nike really cost the Seahawks. I'd love to see a remake of these uniforms, and they'd sell like hot-cakes. Did it? Are Seahawks jersey sales at an all-time low? Since when did sales indicate the uniform is aesthetically pleasing? Especially on these forums where the modern, trendy uniforms are criticized he most. So how did the move to Nike "cost" the Seahawks? Appearance wise, it "costed" then. Financially, obviously not. But that also plays along with A. their success in the new uniforms and B. having colorful players like Marshawn Lynch and Russel Wilson. Those Seahawks jerseys wouldn't be selling the same way if Tim Hasselbeck was still tossing the ball around and going 7-9 every season.
  12. Who would've thought this look would be lightyears better than what they have now. That switch to nike really cost the Seahawks. I'd love to see a remake of these uniforms, and they'd sell like hot-cakes. Did it? Are Seahawks jersey sales at an all-time low? Since when did sales indicate the uniform is aesthetically pleasing? Especially on these forums where the modern, trendy uniforms are criticized he most.
  13. Who would've thought this look would be lightyears better than what they have now. That switch to nike really cost the Seahawks. I'd love to see a remake of these uniforms, and they'd sell like hot-cakes.
  14. tampa bay does have a wordmark it's just on the left sleeve instead for some stupid reasonOh yeah... that wordmark. Like I said though, the wordmark should appear right under the collar, and putting it anywhere else (especially on the left sleeve, not even both) is worse than not having it at all. I'm thinking that the Bucs uniforms wouldn't be nearly as bad if they just changed those nasty numbers and put the wordmark (Change Bucs to Buccaneers of course) at the top. It'd still look forced with the unneeded orange striping and the downgraded pewter color, but hey, still not as bad as what they got now.
  15. NFL teams should always have wordmarks right under the collar. Jacksonville's soccer crest and Tampa Bay's complete absence of a wordmark are two major flaws that both of these uniforms suffer from.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.