Jump to content

DCarp1231

Members
  • Posts

    9,327
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    136

Posts posted by DCarp1231

  1. 13 minutes ago, MCM0313 said:

    Right. This is not soccer. This is not Europe. This is American football, and  NFL teams have plural names. They need to stop with this nonsense and pick an *actual* name.  

    spacer.png

    • Like 11
    • LOL 1
  2. 6 minutes ago, ptaylor said:

     

    I do get the appeal (feels classic and old school) and if the on-field product continues to improve then it could work.

     

    But man, any time someone calls them 'The Football Team' I want to vomit. Will always feel like a placeholder name to me. 

    IIRC, when the team announced the temporary identity, they did it in a way as to not get fans too attached to it...

     

    spacer.png

    • Like 9
  3. On 3/19/2021 at 12:25 PM, ManillaToad said:

     

    Definitely true though there are a fair amount of people here who prefer the new helmet for whatever reason

    For me, it’s the simple fact that the old helmet horns had an incredibly wonky shape compared to the newer ones. I don’t mind the break in the horn either.

    spacer.png

    spacer.png

     

    • Like 3
  4. 3 minutes ago, Old School Fool said:

    I think that Browns jersey is almost a confirmation that the one helmet rule has been changed. The rumors of the Browns having a white helmet have persisted forever and there's no reason to wear this jersey unless you have the proper helmet or else it's just the regular away uniform with drop shadow.

    I mean these teams wear their respective throwbacks without the proper helmet and still look fine...

    spacer.png

    spacer.png

     

    Obviously the correct helmet is necessary to have a true throwback, but it’s also not completely necessary. The Browns can still use their orange helmet and be fine.

     

    Like @Cujo said, give us true Tampa Bay and New England throwbacks (plus other notable ones like Seattle), then we’ll talk.

    • Like 8
  5. 45 minutes ago, TheOatsMustFlow said:

     

     

    He is right that the 9's used in the Cardinals' Tweet are a different font than what is used on the Cardinals uniforms. 

     

    But, the Cardinals social media team has been using the incorrect font for these types of posts for the last couple of years, so it's no evidence of new uniforms.

    Interestingly enough, they did not give JJ a jersey to hold up at the press conference yesterday, so maybe that is evidence of new unis coming! But probably the real reason for that was him finding out earlier that day that he would get to use #99 which was previously retired by the Cardinals. 

    More or less the same deal with what the Ravens have been doing with lettering in social media for a few years now-

    spacer.png

    • Like 2
  6. I can’t see how anyone thinks the 1995-2012 Jaguars logo is better than the current. It got a much needed and ideal facelift. However, since its inception, it has been constantly overshadowed by the poor uniform choices.

    • Like 11
  7. 7 minutes ago, Sport said:

    - The Steelers need something there so when you're looking at the player from the left there's at least one logo present. Why not just put a logo on the blank side of the helmet? Sure, if I could time travel to Pittsburgh in the 1960's and slap stickers on the left side of their helmets to calm my OCD I would, but at this point you can't mess with the helmet. 

    Weird.

    spacer.png

    • Like 5
    • Huh? 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.