DCarp1231

On 6/22/2021 at 1:40 PM, Davidellias said:

Baseball road uniforms should be team colored not grey .

 Home should be color

Away should be white

Alt should be grey or color

7 hours ago, MNtwins3 said:

It's not bad. The Rams are bad. This is just boring. There's nothing bad about this set other than it's very basic. It is the Houston Astros of the NFL

It is bad. I don’t know how anyone can look at that and say it’s not. I’m not talking about the set as a whole either. I’m talking about how, for some reason, Lawrence (or whoever told him and Etienne to wear this for the photo shoot), thought the all white below the waist was a good look.

Unless I missed something last season, for as bad as the Rams may look, at least they never wore all bone below the waist in a game.

This... is BAD

5 minutes ago, JayMac said:

So how many helmets will each NFL team have by 2025? We all know they will not stop at 2.

Unless they decide to change this new rule in 3-4 seasons, it’s going to be two. As we saw with the Color Rush program, there’s definitely a high likelihood it gets relaxed to allow mix-and-matching with the regular home and aways. 

26 minutes ago, spartacat_12 said:

Ravens in a purple helmet feels like its encroaching on Vikings territory.

A purple team doing purple things isn’t encroaching on anything. It’s like saying the Patriots can’t ever do a Pat Patriot helmet again because the Bills currently use a white helmet full time.

1 minute ago, lahaye7 said:

love that font, but they did look like the bears. 

If the Bears and Saints had a love child

19 minutes ago, GoCubsGo said:

I’m just pointing out that there is going to be some horrible looking helmets in the next few years.

I highly doubt a team as traditional as the Bears would be dumb enough to pull something like that. A faux leather helmet? Absolutely should be in the cards. A ridiculous orange helmet for the sake of an orange helmet? Not a chance in hell.

16 minutes ago, GoGreenGoWhite said:

 

 

Is this what you're referring to? I thought this was the Bears.

Yes. @Old School Fool even says “Raiders” in the post

2 minutes ago, GoGreenGoWhite said:

Do any photos of this exist?

Look up on this page

16 hours ago, NFLfan10 said:

It's all fun and games until we realize half the teams that utilize another helmet will do it for some  monochromatic, Color Rush style Arena League look rather than a classic Throwback.

Possibly the only team I’m okay with doing this is Baltimore. They’ve only ever had a standard black helmet plus they can’t exactly do their original helmet logo for legal reasons. All purple* would be fine by me.

*- with the inclusion of black socks.

I hope the Vikings do this right and bring back these-

and even though I loathe the purple mask with purple helmet, these would be nice too-

We’ll probably see the faux leather helmets for Washington. Once the rebranding happens, it’s open season on helmets for that team

Two helmets?

On 6/16/2021 at 4:52 PM, Unocal said:

 

Zach Thomas

 

 

I know it’s probably a typo, but that’s definitely Jason Taylor

These,

are better than these,

  
and these,

but all three are better than these,

11 hours ago, RyanMcD29 said:

Excuse me that's the GREATEST. DIVISION. IN SPORTS. to you!

 

(It's true because Fox, NBC, and ESPN make sure to always put them front and center)

The Cowboys? Absolutely

The rest of the division? Not a snowball’s chance in hell

26 minutes ago, spartacat_12 said:

 

A broadcaster starting a game by announcing "tonight the Football Giants take on the Eagles", isn't as much of an issue as hearing them say "tonight the Football Team takes on the Cowboys".

Except for the fact that “Football Team” is the official name so it’s not an issue. There’s a big irrelevancy to “Football Giants” still being used. It may be fun to say, but there’s no point in referring to New York as such.

13 minutes ago, Sec19Row53 said:

Does anyone OTHER than Chris Berman still do this?

@BBTV

I’ve heard it quite often honestly. I’m not entirely sure why anyone still says it. It’s irrelevant to even mention the “Football” part for the Giants.  As is “THE Ohio State”.  At least with Washington there’s currently and legitimately a necessary reason to say the “Football” part.

More of a “grinds my gear” kind of deal, I suppose. To each their own.

3 minutes ago, BBTV said:

 

The Giants have nothing to do with any discussion about whether or not WFT is a good name.  Literally nothing.

FOOTBALL Team

FOOTBALL Giants

I don’t know, math checks out to me.

7 minutes ago, BBTV said:

 

What's that have to do with anything?

At least “Football Team” has relevancy to the current league landscape. Pretty sure there’s no need to keep saying “FOOTBALL Giants” after 63 years of the other Giants being out West.

Can we all agree that the biggest menace is people still referring to the Giants as “The New York FOOTBALL Giants” as if it still has any real meaning anymore.

21 minutes ago, ManillaToad said:

 

Good that's what they get for having a non-name for two years

Seems like a name to me

Was searching for info about the new uniform and these concept photos kept popping up-

I‘ll admit it’s a better horn design than the current one, but I still can’t get past the wonkiness of the horn

1 hour ago, Old School Fool said:

An all white alternate uniform for the Rams sounds like a good idea to me, then they can make it the primary away uniform after a few years.

They aren’t that smart.

Yeah, I take back my “meh” comment.

These look damn good.