Dynasty

Please tell me that's fake.

The problem I have with the Canadiens' uniforms is that they don't match. Either go with the waist stripe on both uniforms or don't even bother using it at all. The 'Canes look isn't bad, but it could be so much better. Too many teams use the colors' red and black and their alternate logo, in my opinion, is better.

As much as I like the Orioles' cartoon bird, I don't like it as a cap logo. I much prefer the ornithologically correct bird (or even the O's logo) as a cap logo.

I hardly doubt that's unpopular. I'm glad they went with normal-sized numbers later on, though.

They should really bring that back.

The Miami Marlins have only been to the playoffs twice in their existence, in 1997 and 2003, and won their two World Series titles in those respected seasons.

Yes, I also think they need black, but only as a trim color. They don't need to be a red and black team because we already have enough of those in hockey. Agreed. I would love to see some teams like Tampa Bay or San Jose go with something different. I love their jerseys but hate the logo. They could have easily just recolored what they had, despite what the owner or whoever was said when they were unveiled. I think they should've went with an entirely different identity when they left Minneapolis. I get the nod to the North Stars, but I've just never been a fan of what they later became (adding black for the most of it). I also think it looks incredibly weird that a Dallas-based team isn't using blue, but that's more of a personal perspective of mine. I still think their current look is the best they've ever looked as the "Dallas Stars". Also, I would've prefer if they went with "Texas" instead of "Dallas" because they're the only NHL team in their state. I'm excited to see Michigan Red Wings and the Massachusetts Bruins start up next season. Some teams can use their state name; Michigan and Massachusetts aren't one of them.

Damn, I thought their rebrand was pretty successful. I hope their next rebrand is even better.

Fantastic.

I love their jerseys but hate the logo. They could have easily just recolored what they had, despite what the owner or whoever was said when they were unveiled. I think they should've went with an entirely different identity when they left Minneapolis. I get the nod to the North Stars, but I've just never been a fan of what they later became (adding black for the most of it). I also think it looks incredibly weird that a Dallas-based team isn't using blue, but that's more of a personal perspective of mine. I still think their current look is the best they've ever looked as the "Dallas Stars". Also, I would've prefer if they went with "Texas" instead of "Dallas" because they're the only NHL team in their state.

I would prefer the blue caps with the green bills to have a green button on the top, but I do like the team's connections to the city. I still need to see the uniforms first before I give it a final grade.

These are my reasons.

This... ...is better than this...

(Found it on Google... sure enough it was from CCSLC and a similar thread: http://boards.sportslogos.net/topic/84264-jerseys-you-didnt-think-were-used-at-the-same-time/?p=1695713) This is unrelated to the thread, but going from red helmets to black helmets was a mistake by the Falcons.

I wonder how that would look with a white outline instead of a navy outline.

I still don't think the 76ers new uniforms are that much of an improvement over their previous ones.

The thing I liked about Reebok were the shiny uniforms for teams that had metallic colors (silver, gold, etc.).

I love the Brewers current identity. I've said this before, their ball-in-glove set just didn't scream "Brewers" to me and I personally think ANY team with the initials, M and B, could use that set. Not to mention that the set was fairly outdated to me. What they have now is clean, modern, and represents their name quite well. It has it's flaws, but they're too minor for me to consider the entire identity a "mess". IF the Brewers were to go into a new direction with their identity, I'd rather them start from scratch than bringing back the old ball-in-glove set.

The Atlanta Hawks' winged logo is a great logo, even if it doesn't fit with their set.

I honestly don't think those are that bad. It's just that their current set is far superior, in my opinion.

In regards to the Lightning, all they need to do is use Dark Blue and Silver and then they're good. (Is that an unpopular opinion, too?)

I like the Browns using only a helmet as a logo.

The Ducks have never really had a great look IMO. I couldn't stand the wacky and cheesy "Mighty Duck" scheme at all and I think what they have now is significantly better. That being said, it still lacks in appeal and I do think they should blow the whole thing up and start over.

It took me a while to get use to Miami's new logo as I grew up watching them with their old logo and it was hard for me to move on from it. The new uniforms are definitely an upgrade, I will say that.

I think they're good, so long as they're not too generic.