-
Posts
2,723 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Posts posted by _DietDrPepper_
-
-
Some really good updates! I really like Denver and Jacksonville, however, I have a some nitpicking; Seattle imo should be cut down to 2 shades of green, and maybe throw in yellow, I think a deep forest green and kelly could work well together, pair that with an athletic gold in place of the current dark green. If you wanted to stick with 3 shades, I’d separate them a bit more still. The logo also gets a bit lost in the helmet. Minnesota, I think the white m on the helmet stands out really poorly considering there’s no white anywhere else in the identity. I’m also concerned with how a cream colored helmet would look in practice. Jacksonville could try some black pants as an option maybe. Finally for Denver I’d simplify the helmet logo, the logo looks really good, but shrunken down on a navy helmet, some details get lost, I’d try a simplified shield with just the pickaxes maybe?
-
On 2/9/2020 at 12:47 AM, BringBackTheVet said:
Why the underscores?
My guess is as good as yours
-
5 minutes ago, gosioux76 said:
I agree. They've also done some really cool promo stuff using old-school two-bar helmets.
Didn’t the AAF do the exact same thing, they even went all the way and added fauxback designs and logos on the helmets
- 2
-
I feel like you can separate the league into 3 groups. The good, the bad and the ugly.
1.New York
2.Seattle
2.St. Louis
2.DC
5.Houston
6.Dallas
10.LA
100.Tampa Bay
- 1
-
Isn’t St. Louis’ road uniform supposed to have blue pants? Yet here they are with grey ones?
- 1
-
1 hour ago, daniel75 said:
I’m not sure there’s any really bad uni’s in the entire league.
LA and Tampa Bay, maybe the two best names, but their uniforms are god awful tbh. Tampa should drop that disgusting shade of bright green, and LA should drop black.
Outside of those, DC disappointed me a bit, I would hope the all red look would maybe look better in light, it didn’t. It’s still a nice kit, just either get a white helmet or white shorts. Seattle on the other hand looked much better than I would’ve imagined, they look great! Houston exceeded my expectations as well. Los Angeles however, well I already said, they look pretty rough.
-
33 minutes ago, infrared41 said:
So who were you before this?
BellaSpurs
-
Decided to try it again and it worked. Don’t know what changed
-
I tried changing my name, but I kept getting “that value is not aloud” any ideas why?
-
My relationship with UK’s checkers are split, I liked the idea of tying into the race horse patterns and jockey patterns but, and I mean this more towards our basketball uniforms, why can’t we just have a classic look, I think, even on the football uniforms, the checkers look too young for such a established program. And not to mention, it’s the pattern of our conference rivals. I would love to see the football uniforms return to something simpler. At least drop the chrome please. And for the basketball team to return to something like we had during the Rupp era. Duke and North Carolina haven’t touched their primaries or have gone back to their classic uniforms while we have this bad take at a modern uniform. I mean it’s not as bad as 2015, but we could look so much better.
- 3
-
On other sites I usually pick names including Dr.Pepper, I’m not stepping on anybody else’s toes with that name here am I?
-
The helmet for the browns logo looks fine
- 5
-
36 minutes ago, neo_prankster said:
What's wrong with thinking outside the box?
That’s not thinking outside the box, those names are just childish and dumb
- 6
-
2 hours ago, GDAWG said:
Every other XFL helmet
- 4
-
-
Big fan of the ‘Rocks! They look really classy!
-
The brand is great! Narwhals would've been much better than Sea Unicorns though
- 3
-
1. D.C.
2. N.Y.C.
3. St. Louis
4.
5.
.
.
9.
10. Tampa Bay
11. Seattle
12. Los Angeles
13. Dallas
14. Houston
Theres such a noticeable gap between the quality of the first three and the rest it’s crazy. Some look like they were designed today, some looked like the belong in 2005.
- 2
-
Just now, GDAWG said:
My issue is the use of the letters "LA" that is used by the Lakers, Kings, Clippers, Dodgers, Galaxy and LAFC. They could have used a different symbol, one that stands out, that makes them different.
But the wildcats have one of the better logos in the xfl because it’s just a LA...
Its classic Los Angeles, and for such a futuristic and poorly designed league, it feel like the only thing that’s grounded in reason
- 1
-
LA could’ve brought back the Bucs orange and red color scheme since Tampa seems so scared to do it, but they pull this crap out. Too much black, bad side paneling, just Awful. The only good ones are NYC and DC, the rest can go in the chute.
- 2
-
11 minutes ago, Dolphins Dynasty said:
Outside of D.C. and New York, I'm not too big on the rest of these. The templates suck; I though we grew out of the piping/panel era?
Someone who knew football designed New York and DC, their child made the rest of them
- 5
-
I would darken each shade a touch but I like this much more than the Shockwaves!
- 2
-
Seattle is, interesting. Just like Tampa it’s so close but so far, the helmet is okay, a unique concept (which seems to be a pattern in this league) and the navy uniforms are definitely better than the white. The white just lacks any color balance that the navy sorta has. The side striping is what kills this. Just like with Tampa, it doesn’t match. The pants would be okay on their own if you got rid of the side stripes.
The white set would be so much more improved if there was any navy at all.
- 1
-
The thing that ruins it for the vipers is the helmet color, helmet logo and side panels. I think it’s a couple tweaks away from being decent.
Hopefully LA and Seattle are more like NYC and DC rather than Dallas, Houston, and Tampa.
XFL 2023 Logos, Names and Uniforms
in Sports Logo News
Posted
St. Louis is the team that surprised me the most, I wasn’t completely sold on their look till I saw how gorgeous their blue was in game, the grey pants, even though they aren’t what their supposed to wear, look great as well.